设计思维下高职Python课程教学模式探索与实践
Exploration and Practice of Teaching Mode for Python Courses in Higher Vocational Education Based on Design Thinking
摘要: 针对高职Python课程中存在的知识碎片化、产学脱节与创新能力培养不足等问题,本研究基于设计思维理论,构建了“双项目进阶、五阶段迭代”教学模式。以“猜数字游戏”与“我爱记单词”两项目为载体,系统融入共情、定义、构思、原型、测试五阶段。教学实践表明,该模式显著提升了学生的知识整合与创新能力,实验组综合得分率比对照组提高13.98%,尤其在综合应用与创新设计题型上表现突出(p < 0.05)。质性分析显示,课堂氛围和学生的创新自信、团队协作与学习动机都有显著增强。本研究为高职信息技术课程从“技能传授”向“思维与能力并重”转型提供了可行路径。
Abstract: Addressing the issues of knowledge fragmentation, disconnection between production and learning, and insufficient cultivation of innovation ability in Python courses in higher vocational education, this study constructs a “dual-project progression, five-stage iteration” teaching model based on design thinking theory. Using the “Guess the Number Game” and “I Love Memorizing Words” projects as carriers, the model systematically integrates the five stages of empathy, definition, ideation, prototyping, and testing. Teaching practice shows that this model significantly enhances students’ knowledge integration and innovation ability. The experimental group achieved a 13.98% higher comprehensive score rate compared to the control group, particularly excelling in comprehensive application and innovative design questions (p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis reveals that classroom atmosphere, students’ confidence in innovation, team collaboration, and learning motivation have all been significantly enhanced. This study provides a feasible path for the transformation of information technology courses in higher vocational education from “skills impartation” to “emphasizing thinking and ability”.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
周钢, 李永杰, 郭晖, 等. 以Python推动计算思维培养落地的大学计算机基础课程教学[J]. 计算机教育, 2022(2): 79-82.
|
|
[2]
|
仲冰. 结合实例开展C语言程序设计教学[J]. 科技视界, 2021(35): 44-45.
|
|
[3]
|
Henriksen, D., Gretter, S. and Richardson, C. (2018) Design Thinking and the Practicing Teacher: Addressing Problems of Practice in Teacher Education. Teaching Education, 31, 209-229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
刘海鹏. 大语言模型全链赋能的“Python程序设计”课程教学新范式研究[J]. 无线互联科技, 2025, 22(18): 125-128.
|
|
[5]
|
周丽蓉, 全华凤, 李宜汀, 等. 财经高校Python程序设计课程改革实践路径[J]. 计算机教育, 2025(9): 202-207.
|
|
[6]
|
王昕天, 胡畔. 启发式教学在工具类课程中的应用效果与经验启示——以Python数据分析课程为例[J]. 高教学刊, 2025, 11(22): 119-124.
|
|
[7]
|
Retna, K.S. (2015) Thinking about “Design Thinking”: A Study of Teacher Experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36, 5-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
田劲松, 刘新, 李军利, 等. STEM教育视域下跨学科整合设计思维的教学模式构建与实践研究[J]. 高等理科教育, 2025(5): 96-104.
|
|
[9]
|
朱龙. 设计思维: 一种面向21世纪教育创新的实践框架[J]. 数字教育, 2020(1): 32-35.
|
|
[10]
|
韩少文, 田原, 韩鸿远. “超学科”视野下的创意“泛化”: 设计思维课程教学新探索[J]. 设计, 2024, 37(13): 87-90.
|
|
[11]
|
Kolodner, J.L. (1993) Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
|
|
[12]
|
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
Razzouk, R. and Shute, V. (2012) What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82, 330-348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|