基于系统动力学的大学“水课”产生原因及解决策略分析
Analysis of the Causes and Solutions of “Water Courses” in Universities Based on System Dynamics
摘要: 大学“水课”是高等教育质量提升面临的重大挑战,它稀释了本科教育的含金量,与人才培养目标相悖。本研究将“水课”现象视为一个复杂的、多主体反馈的系统,运用系统动力学方法构建了大学课程质量系统的因果回路图,对影响因素的相互作用机制进行了深入分析。研究发现,“水课”的产生主要由两个核心强化回路驱动:一是“劣币驱逐良币”的市场强化回路(R1),即学生策略性选课与教师考核“放水”之间的恶性循环;二是“重科研轻教学”的制度强化回路(R2),即大学声誉竞争对教师教学投入的系统性挤压。系统分析结果表明,R2机制导致的制度和激励错位,是削弱金课供给、催生水课需求的最根本原因。基于此,本文提出需采取系统性策略,包括重构教师激励机制、深化教学评价改革以及加强过程质量监管,才能从根本上消除水课、构建高质量的“金课”生态体系。
Abstract: The proliferation of “water courses” in universities is a major challenge to the improvement of higher education quality. It dilutes the value of undergraduate education and is contrary to the goal of talent cultivation. This study regards the “water course” phenomenon as a complex, multi-agent feedback system. By applying the system dynamics method, a causal loop diagram of the university course quality system is constructed, and an in-depth analysis of the interaction mechanism of influencing factors is conducted. Research has found that the emergence of “watered-down courses” is mainly driven by two core reinforcement loops: one is the market reinforcement loop (R1) where “bad money drives out good”, that is, the vicious cycle between students’ strategic course selection and teachers’ “watered-down” assessment. The second is the institutional reinforcement loop (R2) of “emphasizing research over teaching”, that is, the systematic squeeze on teachers’ teaching investment caused by the competition for university reputation. The results of the system analysis show that the mismatch of systems and incentives caused by the R2 mechanism is the most fundamental reason for weakening the supply of high-quality courses and stimulating the demand for low-quality courses. Based on this, this paper proposes that a systematic strategy should be adopted, including reconstructing the teacher incentive mechanism, deepening the reform of teaching evaluation, and strengthening the supervision of process quality, in order to fundamentally eliminate water courses and build a high-quality “golden course” ecosystem.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中华人民共和国教育部. 深入实施科教兴国战略, 提升国家创新体系整体效能[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/2025/2025_zt03/baogao/sulan/202503/t20250306_1181545.html, 2025-03-06.
|
|
[2]
|
中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于一流本科课程建设的实施意见[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201910/t20191031_406269.html, 2019-10-30.
|
|
[3]
|
郝龙飞, 汪雅霜. 拨开迷雾: 高校“水课”形成的深层影响机制探究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2021, 39(12): 7-13.
|
|
[4]
|
刘斯文, 程晋宽. 大学“金课”的建构逻辑: 起点、过程与走向[J]. 高校教育管理, 2020, 14(6): 117-124.
|
|
[5]
|
吴岩. 建设中国“金课” [J]. 中国大学教学, 2018(12): 4-9.
|
|
[6]
|
刘进, 林松月. 什么是大学“水课”: 概念范畴、关键特征与治理方向[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2019(9): 7-14.
|
|
[7]
|
李志义. “水课”与“金课”之我见[J]. 中国大学教学, 2018(12): 24-29.
|
|
[8]
|
Hussein, S. (2010) Education Quality Control Based on System Dynamics and Evolutionary Computation. In: Modeling Simulation and Optimization—Focus on Applications, InTech. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
AnyLogic. 系统动力学——AnyLogic仿真软件[EB/OL]. https://www.anylogic.cn/use-of-simulation/system-dynamics/, 2025-11-17.
|
|
[10]
|
Zheng, K., Sun, S. and Yu, H. (2016) College Teaching Quality Evaluation Based on System Dynamics Model. MATEC Web of Conferences, 61, Article No. 04027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
文双春. 大学教学质量为何难以提升[N]. 中国科学报, 2019-05-27(008).
|
|
[12]
|
郝龙飞, 操太圣. 高校“水课”问题产生的制度归因——基于社会学制度主义的视角[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 10(2): 103-114.
|
|
[13]
|
罗萍, 李化树. 场域理论视角下的高校“水课”: “水”从何来与去向何处[J]. 高教探索, 2025(3): 73-80.
|
|
[14]
|
程帆. 高校“水课”的特征、成因和提升路径的实证分析[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2024, 42(18): 14-17.
|
|
[15]
|
陆国栋. 治理“水课”打造“金课” [J]. 中国大学教学, 2018(9): 23-25.
|