骨缺损修复生物材料的研究进展与应用前景
Research Progress and Application Prospects of Biomaterials for Bone Defect Repair
DOI: 10.12677/jcpm.2026.51078, PDF,   
作者: 袁浩翔*:成都中医药大学临床医学院,四川 成都;袁小波:内江市中医医院,骨关节与运动医学科,四川 内江;陈生文#:内江市第一人民医院,骨关节与运动医学科,四川 内江
关键词: 骨缺损骨再生无机材料天然生物材料支架生物相容性Biomaterial Bone Regeneration Inorganic Material Natural Biomaterial Scaffold Biocompatibility
摘要: 骨骼作为具有高刚度和活跃新陈代谢的活体结构,其小缺损可通过自身修复机制愈合,但创伤、手术切除及骨相关疾病引发的超临界骨缺损(通常指长度大于1~2 cm或骨周损失超50%)需借助生物材料辅助修复。生物材料凭借良好的生物相容性、机械性能及功能调控潜力,成为骨缺损修复领域的核心研究方向,其通过模拟细胞外基质、调节细胞行为及构建适宜微环境,为骨再生提供关键支撑。本文系统综述了骨缺损修复相关生物材料的研究现状,重点分类阐述了无机材料(金属材料、生物陶瓷等)和天然生物材料(生物聚合物、水凝胶、自体衍生材料等)的成分特性、改性技术、作用机制及临床应用研究成果,分析了材料表面结构、孔隙率、离子释放等关键因素对骨整合与再生的影响。同时,展望了纳米复合材料、聚乙烯醇(PVA)基材料及基因工程靶向生物材料等新型材料的发展趋势,提出未来研究应聚焦于模拟骨再生自然过程(如血管生成与骨生成耦合),优化支架材料选择、几何结构设计及生物分子控释系统。本文为骨缺损修复生物材料的研发与临床转化提供参考,以期推动骨外科治疗中骨替代材料的创新与应用。
Abstract: Bone, as a living structure with high stiffness and active metabolism, can heal small defects through its intrinsic repair mechanism. However, critical-sized bone defects (typically defined as defects longer than 1~2 cm or with more than 50% periosteal loss) caused by trauma, surgical resection, and bone-related diseases require assistance from biomaterials for effective repair. Biomaterials have emerged as a core research direction in bone defect repair due to their excellent biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and functional regulatory potential. By simulating the extracellular matrix, regulating cellular behaviors, and constructing a favorable microenvironment, biomaterials provide crucial support for bone regeneration. This article systematically reviews the current research status of biomaterials related to bone defect repair, focusing on the classification, compositional characteristics, modification technologies, mechanisms of action, and clinical application research results of inorganic materials (metallic materials, bioceramics, etc.) and natural biomaterials (biopolymers, hydrogels, autologous-derived materials, etc.). It analyzes the effects of key factors such as material surface structure, porosity, and ion release on osseointegration and regeneration. Meanwhile, the development trends of novel materials, such as nanocomposites composed of biodegradable polymers, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-based materials, and gene-engineered targeted biomaterials for bone regeneration, are prospected. Future research should aim to better simulate the natural process of bone regeneration, such as the coupling between angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Although imitating nature is challenging, recent scientific and technological advancements indicate the possibility of fabricating bone scaffolds that support local and systemic biological functions. The rational selection of scaffold materials, their geometric structure design, pore size, and the ability to release biomolecules at an optimal rate will play a pivotal role in the development of bone scaffolds in the future. This article provides a reference for the research and development as well as clinical translation of biomaterials for bone defect repair, with the intention of promoting the innovation and application of bone substitute materials in orthopedic therapy.
文章引用:袁浩翔, 袁小波, 陈生文. 骨缺损修复生物材料的研究进展与应用前景[J]. 临床个性化医学, 2026, 5(1): 569-575. https://doi.org/10.12677/jcpm.2026.51078

参考文献

[1] Zhang, Y., Sun, N., Zhu, M., Qiu, Q., Zhao, P., Zheng, C., et al. (2022) The Contribution of Pore Size and Porosity of 3D Printed Porous Titanium Scaffolds to Osteogenesis. Biomaterials Advances, 133, Article 112651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Jiao, J., Hong, Q., Zhang, D., Wang, M., Tang, H., Yang, J., et al. (2023) In-fluence of Porosity on Osteogenesis, Bone Growth and Osteointegration in Trabecular Tantalum Scaffolds Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, Article ID: 1117954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Zhuang, Y., Zhao, Z., Cheng, M., Li, M., Si, J., Lin, K., et al. (2022) HIF-1α Regulates Osteogenesis of Periosteum-Derived Stem Cells under Hypoxia Conditions via Modulating POSTN Expression. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 10, Article ID: 836285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Chen, L., Zhu, J., Ge, N., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Liu, G., et al. (2025) A Biodegradable Magnesium Alloy Promotes Subperiosteal Osteogenesis via Interleu-kin-10-Dependent Macrophage Immunomodulation. Biomaterials, 318, Article 122992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Gupta, S., Teotia, A.K., Qayoom, I., Shiekh, P.A., Andrabi, S.M. and Kumar, A. (2021) Periosteum-Mimicking Tissue-Engineered Composite for Treating Periosteum Damage in Critical-Sized Bone De-fects. Biomacromolecules, 22, 3237-3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Nicolas, J., Magli, S., Rabbachin, L., Sampaolesi, S., Nicotra, F. and Russo, L. (2020) 3D Extracellular Matrix Mimics: Fundamental Concepts and Role of Materials Chem-istry to Influence Stem Cell Fate. Biomacromolecules, 21, 1968-1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Kim, Y., Zharkinbekov, Z., Raziyeva, K., Tabyldiyeva, L., Berikova, K., Zhumagul, D., et al. (2023) Chitosan-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration. Pharmaceutics, 15, Article 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Eltit, F., Wang, Q. and Wang, R. (2019) Mechanisms of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions to Hip Implants. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, Article ID: 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Fan, L., Chen, S., Yang, M., Liu, Y. and Liu, J. (2023) Metallic Materials for Bone Repair. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 13, Article 2302132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Han, H., Jun, I., Seok, H., Lee, K., Lee, K., Witte, F., et al. (2020) Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys Promote Angio‐osteogenesis to Enhance Bone Repair. Advanced Science, 7, Article 2000800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Wang, Z., Mei, L., Liu, X. and Zhou, Q. (2021) Hierarchically Hybrid Biocoatings on Ti Implants for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity and Osteogenesis. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 204, Article 111802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Sarraf, M., Rezvani Ghomi, E., Alipour, S., Ramakrishna, S. and Liana Su-kiman, N. (2021) A State-of-the-Art Review of the Fabrication and Characteristics of Titanium and Its Alloys for Biomedical Applica-tions. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 5, 371-395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 赵冰净, 胡敏: 用于3D打印的医用金属研究现状[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2015, 16(1): 53-56.
[14] 王庆, 翁益平, 刘宏伟, 张文, 施勤, 张润泽, 蒋俊锋, 王彩梅. 3D打印不同孔径钛合金支架修复兔股骨缺损: 600μm孔径更有利于骨整合[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25(28): 4441-4446.
[15] Drevet, R., Fauré, J. and Benhayoune, H. (2023) Bioactive Calcium Phosphate Coatings for Bone Implant Applica-tions: A Review. Coatings, 13, Article 1091.
[16] 卢燕勤, 易芳, 鞠巍, 李文杰, 雷蕾. Ca-P涂层镁合金支架负载缓释微球修复股骨缺损[J]. 中国组织工程研究 2019, 23(2): 232-238.
[17] 宋美玲, 李征宇, 艾子政, 李京娜, 曾庆丰, 韩倩倩, 董谢平. 不同比例羟基磷灰石/β-磷酸三钙涂层支架修复骨缺损[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2023, 27(30): 4809-4816.
[18] 刘兵, 马翔宇, 杨超, 解冰, 周大鹏. 抗生素骨水泥涂层髓内钉结合Masquelet技术治疗胫骨干感染性骨缺损[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2020, 29(10): 791-795.
[19] 何进文, 等. 载HRZ乙酰乙酸涂层的自体髂骨修复兔脊柱结核骨缺损的病理学观察[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2018, 28(6): 552-561.
[20] Kołodziejska, B., Stępień, N. and Kolmas, J. (2021) The Influence of Strontium on Bone Tissue Metabo-lism and Its Application in Osteoporosis Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22, Article 6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Shan, Z., Xie, X., Wu, X., Zhuang, S. and Zhang, C. (2022) Development of De-gradable Magnesium-Based Metal Implants and Their Function in Promoting Bone Metabolism (A Review). Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 36, 184-193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Makkar, P., Kang, H.J., Padalhin, A.R., Faruq, O. and Lee, B. (2020) In-Vitro and In-Vivo Evaluation of Strontium Doped Calcium Phosphate Coatings on Biodegradable Magnesium Alloy for Bone Applications. Applied Surface Science, 510, Article 145333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Balogh, E., Tóth, A., Csiki, D.M. and Jeney, V. (2024) Zinc Ameliorates High Pi and Ca-Mediated Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Nutrients, 16, Article 4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Liu, Y., Wang, L., Dou, X., Du, M., Min, S., Zhu, B., et al. (2024) Osteogenesis or Apoptosis—Twofold Effects of Zn2+ on Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An in Vitro and in Vivo Study. ACS Omega, 9, 10945-10957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Satchanska, G., Davidova, S. and Petrov, P.D. (2024) Natural and Synthetic Polymers for Biomedical and Environmental Applications. Polymers, 16, Article 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Jabeen, N. and Atif, M. (2023) Polysaccharides Based Biopolymers for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 35, e6203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Zhao, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Liang, H., Chen, X. and Tan, H. (2023) Natural Polymer-Based Hydrogels: From Polymer to Biomedical Applications. Pharmaceutics, 15, Article 2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Muir, V.G. and Burdick, J.A. (2020) Chemically Modified Biopolymers for the Formation of Biomedical Hydrogels. Chemical Reviews, 121, 10908-10949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Kim, Y., Kim, S., Byeon, J., Lee, H., Um, I., Lim, S., et al. (2010) Develop-ment of a Novel Bone Grafting Material Using Autogenous Teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 109, 496-503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Lujerdean, C., Baci, G., Cucu, A. and Dezmirean, D.S. (2022) The Contribution of Silk Fibroin in Biomedical Engineering. Insects, 13, Article 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Chen, Y., Chen, M., Gao, Y., Zhang, F., Jin, M., Lu, S., et al. (2022) Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration. ACS Omega, 7, 19979-19987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Gobi, R., Ravichandiran, P., Babu, R.S. and Yoo, D.J. (2021) Biopolymer and Synthetic Polymer-Based Nanocomposites in Wound Dressing Applications: A Review. Polymers, 13, Article 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Samir, A., Ashour, F.H., Hakim, A.A.A. and Bassyouni, M. (2022) Recent Ad-vances in Biodegradable Polymers for Sustainable Applications. npj Materials Degradation, 6, Article No. 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Cimatti, B., Santos, M.A.d., Brassesco, M.S., Okano, L.T., Barboza, W.M., Nogueira‐Barbosa, M.H., et al. (2018) Safety, Osseointegration, and Bone Ingrowth Analysis of PMMA‐Based Porous Cement on Animal Metaphyseal Bone Defect Model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 106, 649-658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Robo, C., Hulsart-Billström, G., Nilsson, M. and Persson, C. (2018) In Vivo Response to a Low-Modulus PMMA Bone Cement in an Ovine Model. Acta Biomaterialia, 72, 362-370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Bharadwaz, A. and Jayasuriya, A.C. (2020) Recent Trends in the Application of Widely Used Natural and Synthetic Polymer Nanocomposites in Bone Tissue Regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 110, Article 110698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Sagadevan, S., Schirhagl, R., Rahman, M.Z., Bin Ismail, M.F., Lett, J.A., Fati-mah, I., et al. (2023) Recent Advancements in Polymer Matrix Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 82, Article 104313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] Rahman Khan, M.M. and Rumon, M.M.H. (2025) Synthesis of PVA-Based Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Recent Trends and Advances. Gels, 11, Article 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] Zhong, Y., Lin, Q., Yu, H., Shao, L., Cui, X., Pang, Q., et al. (2024) Construction Methods and Biomedical Applications of PVA-Based Hydrogels. Frontiers in Chemistry, 12, Article ID: 1376799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] Chu, X., Xiong, Y., Lu, L., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Zeng, R., et al. (2024) Re-search Progress of Gene Therapy Combined with Tissue Engineering to Promote Bone Regeneration. APL Bioengineering, 8, Article 031502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef