轻量化YOLO模型在非标准体表肿瘤图像检测中的性能研究
Performance Study of Lightweight YOLO Model for Non-Standard Superficial Tumor Image Detection
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.161342, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 魏 鑫, 蔡 霞, 冷向锋*:青岛大学附属医院美容整形外科,山东 青岛;张超群:中国民航大学计算机科学与技术学院,天津
关键词: 体表肿瘤YOLO模型非标准图像深度学习Superficial Tumor YOLO Model Non-Standard Images Deep Learning
摘要: 体表肿瘤作为整形外科学和皮肤病学的重要研究对象,其早期检测对改善患者预后至关重要。本研究提出了一种基于非标准化体表肿瘤图像的智能诊断框架,结合YOLO系列目标检测模型(v7至v10),针对十类常见体表肿瘤实现高效筛查。数据集来源于青岛大学附属医院整形外科的非标准临床图像,涵盖多样化的光照、设备和背景条件,模拟真实场景。实验结果表明,YOLOv10n在检测性能上表现最佳(F1分数0.912,mAP@0.5 0.912,总推理时间4.3 ms),YOLOv8n以0.952的卓越精度超越Faster R-CNN和EfficientDet等传统模型。尽管数据分布不均和图像变异性对稀有类别(如蓝痣)检测构成挑战,YOLO框架仍展现出较强的鲁棒性与实时性。本研究为非标准化场景下的体表肿瘤自动检测提供了技术支持,其轻量化设计适配智能手机等低成本设备,有望推动远程筛查应用,改善体表肿瘤早期诊断效率与患者预后。
Abstract: The early detection of superficial tumors is an important research object in plastic surgery and dermatology, which is crucial for improving patient prognosis. In this study, we propose an intelligent diagnostic framework based on non-standardized superficial tumor images by YOLO series of target detection models (v7 to v10) for ten types of common superficial tumors. The dataset was derived from non-standard clinical images from the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, covering diverse lighting, equipment, and background conditions to simulate real-life scenarios. Experimental results indicated that YOLOv10n performs the best detection (F1-score 0.912, mAP@0.5 0.912, total inference time 4.3 ms). Additionally, YOLOv8n surpasses conventional models, including Faster R-CNN and EfficientDet, with exceptional accuracy (0.952). Despite the uneven distribution of the data and the image variability, which present challenges for rare category (blue mole) detection, the hybrid YOLO framework demonstrates robustness and real-time performance. This study provides technical support for automated superficial tumor detection in non-standardized scenarios. Its lightweight design is suitable for low-cost devices, including smartphones, which can promote remote screening applications and improve the efficiency of early diagnosis of superficial tumors and patient prognosis.
文章引用:魏鑫, 张超群, 蔡霞, 冷向锋. 轻量化YOLO模型在非标准体表肿瘤图像检测中的性能研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(1): 2812-2823. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.161342

参考文献

[1] Chen, A., Albertini, J.G., Bordeaux, J.S., Chen, M.W., Cook, J.L., Davidson, C., et al. (2021) Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: Reconstruction after Skin Cancer Resection. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 85, 423-441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Wagle, N.S. and Jemal, A. (2023) Cancer Statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 73, 17-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2024) Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74, 229-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Fuchs, H.E. and Jemal, A. (2022) Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 72, 7-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Arnold, M., Singh, D., Laversanne, M., Vignat, J., Vaccarella, S., Meheus, F., et al. (2022) Global Burden of Cutaneous Melanoma in 2020 and Projections to 2040. JAMA Dermatology, 158, Article 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Tschandl, P., Codella, N., Akay, B.N., Argenziano, G., Braun, R.P., Cabo, H., et al. (2019) Comparison of the Accuracy of Human Readers versus Machine-Learning Algorithms for Pigmented Skin Lesion Classification: An Open, Web-Based, International, Diagnostic Study. The Lancet Oncology, 20, 938-947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Yeh, I. and Bastian, B.C. (2021) Melanoma Pathology: New Approaches and Classification. British Journal of Dermatology, 185, 282-293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Gershenwald, J.E., Scolyer, R.A., Hess, K.R., Sondak, V.K., Long, G.V., Ross, M.I., et al. (2017) Melanoma Staging: Evidence‐Based Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 67, 472-492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Hosny, A., Parmar, C., Quackenbush, J., Schwartz, L.H. and Aerts, H.J.W.L. (2018) Artificial Intelligence in Radiology. Nature Reviews Cancer, 18, 500-510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Fujisawa, Y., Otomo, Y., Ogata, Y., Nakamura, Y., Fujita, R., Ishitsuka, Y., et al. (2019) Deep‐Learning‐Based, Computer‐Aided Classifier Developed with a Small Dataset of Clinical Images Surpasses Board‐Certified Dermatologists in Skin Tumour Diagnosis. British Journal of Dermatology, 180, 373-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Zhou, Z., Rahman Siddiquee, M.M., Tajbakhsh, N. and Liang, J. (2018) UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation. In: Stoyanov, D., Ed., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, 3-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Eli, A.A. and Ali, A. (2024) Deep Learning Applications in Medical Image Analysis: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions. arXiv:2410.14131
[13] Brinker, T.J. (2019) Deep Learning Outperformed 136 of 157 Dermatologists in a Head-to-Head Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification Task. European Journal of Cancer, 113, 47-54.
[14] Wang, C., Bochkovskiy, A. and Liao, H.M. (2023) YOLOV7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors. 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, 17-24 June 2023, 7464-7475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Saha, U., Ahamed, I.U., Imran, M.A., Ahamed, I.U., Hossain, A. and Gupta, U.D. (2024) YOLOV8-Based Deep Learning Approach for Real-Time Skin Lesion Classification Using the HAM10000 Dataset. 2024 IEEE International Conference on E-Health Networking, Application & Services (HealthCom), Nara, 18-20 November 2024, 1-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Han, S.S., Kim, M.S., Lim, W., Park, G.H., Park, I. and Chang, S.E. (2018) Classification of the Clinical Images for Benign and Malignant Cutaneous Tumors Using a Deep Learning Algorithm. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 138, 1529-1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Varghese, R. and M., S. (2024) YOLOV8: A Novel Object Detection Algorithm with Enhanced Performance and Robustness. 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS), Chennai, 18-19 April 2024, 1-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Wang, C., Yeh, I. and Mark Liao, H. (2024) YOLOV9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information. In: Leonardis, A., Ricci, E., Roth, S., Russakovsky, O., Sattler, T. and Varol, G., Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer 1-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Wang, A. (2024) YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection. arXiv:2405.14458
[20] Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R. and Sun, J. (2017) Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39, 1137-1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Tan, M., Pang, R. and Le, Q.V. (2020) EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, 13-19 June 2020, 10778-10787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C., et al. (2016) SSD: Single Shot Multibox Detector. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N. and Welling, M., Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, 21-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K. and Dollár, P. (2018) Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. arXiv:1708.02002.