“双高计划”建设单位动态对比分析:成效、挑战与发展路径
Dynamic Comparative Analysis of the “Double High Plan” Construction Units: Achievements, Challenges, and Development Pathways
摘要: 探索“双高计划”的发展轨迹和演变特征,对客观评估“双高计划”的实施成效,发现问题,优化发展路径具有重要的现实意义。基于首批和第二期建设单位名单,从总体规模、地域分布、学校类型、专业群设置、变动特征等多个维度系统分析,研究显示,“双高计划”规模适度扩大,覆盖更加全面;结构不断优化,布局更加合理,通过动态调整机制,建设质量得到提升。然而计划实施仍面临地域发展不均衡、专业群同质化现象突出、与产业发展的整体契合度及服务国家战略与区域经济的精准度不足等挑战。建议建立专业群设置预警机制,强化特色发展,避免同质竞争;建立产业需求预测机制,定期发布区域产业人才需求指数,保证专业群服务国家战略和地方经济的精准性与前瞻性。
Abstract: Tracking the development trajectory and evolutionary characteristics of the “Double High Plan” (DHP) holds significant practical importance for objectively evaluating its implementation effectiveness, identifying existing problems, and optimizing its development path. Based on the lists of the first and second batches of DHP construction units, this study conducts a systematic analysis across multiple dimensions, including overall scale, geographical distribution, types of institutions, program cluster offerings, and changing features. The findings indicate that the DHP has achieved a moderate expansion in scale and more comprehensive coverage. Its structure has been continuously optimized, leading to a more rational layout, and the construction quality has been enhanced through a dynamic adjustment mechanism. However, challenges persist, such as regional development imbalances, significant homogenization in program clusters, insufficient overall alignment with industrial development, and a lack of precision in serving national strategies and regional economies. It is recommended to establish an early warning mechanism for program cluster offerings to strengthen distinctive development and avoid homogeneous competition. Furthermore, an industrial demand forecasting mechanism should be created, with regular releases of regional talent demand indices, to ensure the precision and foresight of program clusters in serving national strategies and local economic development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
教育部, 财政部. 关于《实施中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设计划的意见》的通知(教职成[2019]5号) [EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A07/moe_737/s3876_qt/201904/t20190402_376471.html?_appinstall=0, 2019-04-01.
|
|
[2]
|
张宇, 徐国庆. “双高计划”高职院校建设思路和实施路径的分析与探讨[J]. 现代教育管理, 2020(2): 110-116.
|
|
[3]
|
刘晓, 钱鉴楠. “双高计划”中期建设绩效与评价的若干思考[J]. 中国高教研究, 2023(3): 84-90.
|
|
[4]
|
王亚南, 成军. 高职院校高水平专业群建构: 内涵意蕴、逻辑及技术路径[J]. 大学教育科学, 2020(6): 118-124
|
|
[5]
|
教育部, 财政部. 关于公布《中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设计划建设单位名单》的通知(教职成函[2019]14号) [EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A07/moe_737/s3876_qt/201912/t20191213_411947.html, 2019-12-13.
|
|
[6]
|
人民网. 江苏公布第二轮国家“双高计划”拟推荐名单[EB/OL]. http://js.people.com.cn/n2/2025/0226/c360307-41146549.html, 2025-10-14.
|
|
[7]
|
中国教育在线. 部分地区公示! “中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设计划(2025-2029年)”拟推荐建设单位名单[EB/OL]. https://zhijiao.eol.cn/detail/2025/02/21/1740102435_24818.html, 2025-10-14.
|
|
[8]
|
职教筑梦. 独家: 129所第二期“双高计划”建设单位分析[EB/OL]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/tRp9wmgi--QLQ7UclcACbw, 2025-10-14.
|
|
[9]
|
华向教科. 第二轮国家“双高计划”名单公示[EB/OL]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/1KgMtEzRbHC1jSLb7v4oIQ, 2025-10-14.
|
|
[10]
|
《关于实施中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设计划(2025-2029年)的通知》(教职成[2025]1号) [EB/OL]. https://www.eol.cn/zhengce/wenjian/202502/t20250219_2655130.shtml, 2025-02-19.
|