多源融合驱动的光伏电站功率日前预测
Multi-Source Fusion Driven Day-Ahead PV Power Forecasting for PV Power Plants
摘要: 针对光伏发电间歇性与波动性导致的日前预测精度不足问题,本文提出“基准构建–融合优化–空间适配”三阶段光伏电站功率日前预测体系。该体系以某6600 kW级光伏电站实测数据与数值天气预报(NWP)数据为基础:首先构建单变量长短期记忆网络(LSTM)基准模型,精准捕捉功率时序依赖;随后通过CLARANS聚类算法划分强、中、弱辐射场景,结合Bi-LSTM融合多源气象数据,增强复杂气象适应性;最后采用Co-Kriging插值法实现NWP数据空间降尺度,解决空间尺度不匹配问题。研究表明,该三阶段协同体系预测性能显著优于单一模型,均方根误差(
RMSE)降至0.0007,决定系数(
R2)提升至0.958,较基准模型精度累计提升30%,复杂地形区域预测误差降低20%以上。本研究通过时序–空间跨维度优化策略,有效提升了光伏功率日前预测的精准度与稳定性,验证了“分阶优化、时空协同”技术路线的可行性,为电网新能源消纳与电力系统高质量发展提供了重要技术支撑。
Abstract: To address the issue of insufficient day-ahead forecasting accuracy caused by the intermittency and variability of photovoltaic power generation, this paper proposes a three-stage day-ahead power forecasting system for photovoltaic power plants: “Benchmark Construction-Fusion Optimisation-Spatial Adaptation”. This framework utilises measured data from a 6600 kW photovoltaic power station alongside Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) data: first, a univariate Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) benchmark model is constructed to precisely capture temporal dependencies in power output; subsequently, the CLARANS clustering algorithm classifies scenarios into strong, moderate, and weak irradiance conditions, while Bi-LSTM integrates multi-source meteorological data to enhance adaptation to complex weather patterns; finally, Co-Kriging interpolation is employed to spatially downscale NWP data, resolving spatial scale mismatch issues. Research demonstrates that this three-stage collaborative system significantly outperforms single models in prediction performance: root mean square error (RMSE) is reduced to 0.0007, coefficient of determination (R2) increases to 0.958, cumulative accuracy improves by 30% over the baseline model, and prediction errors in complex terrain areas decrease by over 20%. Through this spatiotemporal cross-dimensional optimisation strategy, the study effectively enhanced the accuracy and stability of photovoltaic power forecasting. It validated the feasibility of the “multi-stage optimisation and spatiotemporal coordination” technical approach, providing crucial technical support for grid integration of renewable energy and the high-quality development of power systems.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024) World Energy Outlook 2024. International Energy Agency, 45-48.
|
|
[2]
|
鲍玉莹. 风/光发电功率特性分析及模拟算法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2016: 12-13.
|
|
[3]
|
常泽煜, 田亮. 基于Bi-LSTM和Kalman的光伏发电功率超短期预测[J]. 中国测试, 2025, 51(5): 141-147.
|
|
[4]
|
陈嘉铭. 基于深度学习和强化学习的光伏发电功率预测研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2022: 26-40.
|
|
[5]
|
孙娴, 姜创业, 程路, 等. 一个改进的理想大气太阳辐射计算模型[J]. 气象, 2012, 38(9): 1053-1059.
|
|
[6]
|
张玮睿, 胡琦, 和骅芸, 潘学标, 董智强, 李楠. 不同时间尺度中国大陆区域辐射资源时空变化特征分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2024, 45(10): 97-108.
|
|
[7]
|
邓艳君, 邱新法, 曾燕, 等. 几种水平面太阳总辐射量计算模型的对比分析[J]. 气象科学, 2013, 33(4): 371-377.
|
|
[8]
|
王舒雨, 李豪, 马刚, 等. 基于TCN和DLinear的光伏发电功率多步预测模型[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(4): 173-184.
|
|
[9]
|
薛羽馨, 曾威, 任涛, 等. 基于Kriging插值水下连接器密封性能预测模型[J]. 机电工程技术, 2022(2): 51.
|
|
[10]
|
王德文, 焦天媛. 基于二次分解的不同太阳辐射下光伏功率预测[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024(9): 360-368.
|
|
[11]
|
张芸芸, 陈家乐, 李铮伟, 等. 基于Inception-CNN-LSTM的光伏发电输出功率预测模型研究[J]. 太阳能, 2025(4): 69-75.
|
|
[12]
|
王玉强, 牛乾, 金一明, 等. 太阳能光伏发电站发电效率提升策略研究[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(文摘版)工程技术, 2021(10): 2.
|