基于唯物史观的福山“历史终结论”致思与批驳
Deliberation and Refutation of Fukuyama’s “End of History Thesis” Based on Historical Materialism
摘要: 弗朗西斯·福山提出的“历史终结论”以哲学思辨的形式阐述了人类社会历史将“终结”于资本主义自由民主制度的基本观点。在唯物史观视角下,“历史终结论”对历史规律的论证不具有合理性,以抽象人性论颠倒历史发展基本原则,以线性史观简化文明发展路径,并将西方自由民主制度虚构成普世性历史终点,从而构成了“历史动力”“历史进程”“历史目的”三个层面的内在缺陷。
Abstract: Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History Thesis” expounds the core viewpoint that the historical development of human society will “end” in the capitalist system of liberal democracy by virtue of philosophical speculation. From the perspective of historical materialism, the thesis’s demonstration of historical laws is untenable. It reverses the fundamental principles of historical development with the theory of abstract human nature, oversimplifies the development path of civilization with a linear view of history, and fabricates the Western liberal democratic system as a universal historical end. Consequently, the thesis has inherent flaws in three dimensions: the driving force of history, the process of history and the purpose of history.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陶富源. 福山“历史终结论”的历史观剖析[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2020(9): 128-135.
|
|
[2]
|
(美)弗朗西斯∙福山, 著. 历史的终结与最后的人[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2014.
|
|
[3]
|
张左余. 仍待回答的“老问题”——对“历史终结论”的再思考[J]. 北京社会科学, 2019(11): 119-128.
|
|
[4]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集: 第一卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009.
|
|
[5]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集: 第二卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009.
|
|
[6]
|
贾高建. 关于社会历史规律问题的再探讨[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2023(1): 1-7, 203.
|
|
[7]
|
梅岚. “普世价值”的内在困境——以福山“历史终结论”为例[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2017(6): 87-92.
|