注视线索效应的认知机制
Cognitive Mechanisms of the Gaze-Cueing Effect
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.162065, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈秋同:湖南师范大学教育科学学院心理学系,湖南 长沙
关键词: 注视线索效应反射性注意定向社会语境调节证据累积模型Gaze Cueing Effect Reflexive Attentional Orienting Social-Context Modulation Evidence Accumulation Models
摘要: 近年来社会性注意研究快速发展,注视线索效应作为核心范式受到持续关注。现有证据表明,该效应并非单一过程的产物,而由反射性空间定向、社会语境与个体差异的顶层调节,以及决策加工成分共同决定。本文整合行为成分化测量与证据累积建模结果,概括三类机制的关键证据与边界条件,并提出通过SOA、线索预测性与社会学习的正交操纵,结合多模态指标与参数化检验,以提升机制判别力与生态效度。
Abstract: In recent years, research on social attention has advanced rapidly, with the gaze cueing effect receiving sustained interest as a core experimental paradigm. Accumulating evidence indicates that this effect does not arise from a single process; rather, it reflects the joint contributions of reflexive spatial orienting, top-down modulation by social context and individual differences, and decision-related processing components. This article synthesizes findings from component-based behavioral measures and evidence accumulation modeling, summarizes the key evidence and boundary conditions for these three mechanisms, and proposes that orthogonal manipulations of stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA), cue predictiveness, and social learning—combined with multimodal indices and parameter-based tests—can further improve mechanistic discriminability and ecological validity.
文章引用:陈秋同 (2026). 注视线索效应的认知机制. 心理学进展, 16(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.162065

参考文献

[1] Alister, M., McKay, K. T., Sewell, D. K., & Evans, N. J. (2023). Uncovering the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying the Gaze Cueing Effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 803-827.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Atkinson, A. L., Berry, E. D. J., Waterman, A. H., Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2018). Are There Multiple Ways to Direct Attention in Working Memory? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424, 115-126.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Boehm, U., Annis, J., Frank, M. J., Hawkins, G. E., Heathcote, A., Kellen, D. et al. (2018). Estimating Across-Trial Variability Parameters of the Diffusion Decision Model: Expert Advice and Recommendations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 87, 46-75.[CrossRef
[4] Casteau, S., & Smith, D. T. (2020). Covert Attention Beyond the Range of Eye-Movements: Evidence for a Dissociation between Exogenous and Endogenous Orienting. Cortex, 122, 170-186.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Chacón-Candia, J. A., Román-Caballero, R., Aranda-Martín, B., Casagrande, M., Lupiáñez, J., & Marotta, A. (2023). Are There Quantitative Differences between Eye-Gaze and Arrow Cues? A Meta-Analytic Answer to the Debate and a Call for Qualitative Differences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 144, Article 104993.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Chen, A., Wang, M., & Dong, B. (2024). No Effect of Autistic Traits on Social Attention: Evidence Based on Single-Cue and Conflicting-Cues Scenarios. BMC Psychology, 12, Article No. 295.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Chen, H., & Wyble, B. (2018). The Neglected Contribution of Memory Encoding in Spatial Cueing: A New Theory of Costs and Benefits. Psychological Review, 125, 936-968.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Dalmaso, M., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G. (2020). Social Modulators of Gaze-Mediated Orienting of Attention: A Review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 833-855.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Ding, X., Gan, J., Xu, L., Zhou, X., Gao, D., & Sun, Y. (2024). Not to Follow Because of Distrust: Perceived Trust Modulates the Gaze Cueing Effect. Psychological Research, 88, 2195-2210.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Evans, N. J., Trueblood, J. S., & Holmes, W. R. (2020). A Parameter Recovery Assessment of Time-Variant Models of Decision-making. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 193-206.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Feltgen, Q., & Daunizeau, J. (2021). An Overcomplete Approach to Fitting Drift-Diffusion Decision Models to Trial-By-Trial Data. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article ID: 531316.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kompatsiari, K., Ciardo, F., & Wykowska, A. (2022). To Follow or Not to Follow Your Gaze: The Interplay between Strategic Control and the Eye Contact Effect on Gaze-Induced Attention Orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151, 121-136.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Kvam, P. D. (2025). The Tweedledum and Tweedledee of Dynamic Decisions: Discriminating between Diffusion Decision and Accumulator Models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 32, 588-613.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Li, J., Song, H., Huang, X., Fu, Y., Guan, C., Chen, L. et al. (2025). Testing the Memory Encoding Cost Theory Using the Multiple Cues Paradigm. Vision Research, 228, Article 108552.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Liesefeld, H. R., & Janczyk, M. (2019). Combining Speed and Accuracy to Control for Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs(?). Behavior Research Methods, 51, 40-60.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Liu, B., Alexopoulou, Z., & van Ede, F. (2024). Attentional Shifts Bias Microsaccade Direction but Do Not Cause New Microsaccades. Communications Psychology, 2, Article No. 97.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Marchesi, S., De Tommaso, D., Kompatsiari, K., Wu, Y., & Wykowska, A. (2024). Tools and Methods to Study and Replicate Experiments Addressing Human Social Cognition in Interactive Scenarios. Behavior Research Methods, 56, 7543-7560.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] McKay, K. T., Grainger, S. A., Coundouris, S. P., Skorich, D. P., Phillips, L. H., & Henry, J. D. (2021). Visual Attentional Orienting by Eye Gaze: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Gaze-Cueing Effect. Psychological Bulletin, 147, 1269-1289.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Morgan, E. J., Ball, K., & Smith, D. T. (2014). The Role of the Oculomotor System in Covert Social Attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1265-1270.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Myers, C. E., Interian, A., & Moustafa, A. A. (2022). A Practical Introduction to Using the Drift Diffusion Model of Decision-Making in Cognitive Psychology, Neuroscience, and Health Sciences. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 1039172.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Nummenmaa, L., & Calder, A. J. (2009). Neural Mechanisms of Social Attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 135-143.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Parker, S., & Ramsey, R. (2023). What Can Evidence Accumulation Modelling Tell Us about Human Social Cognition? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 639-655.
[24] Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873-922.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., & McKoon, G. (2015). Modeling Regularities in Response Time and Accuracy Data with the Diffusion Model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 458-470.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 260-281.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Schmitz, I., Strauss, H., Reinel, L., & Einhäuser, W. (2024). Attentional Cueing: Gaze Is Harder to Override than Arrows. PLOS ONE, 19, e0301136.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Shin, W., Park, H., Kim, S., & Sul, S. (2023). Individual Differences in Gaze-Cuing Effect Are Associated with Facial Emotion Recognition and Social Conformity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article ID: 1219488.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Uono, S., Egashira, Y., Hayashi, S., Takada, M., Ukezono, M., & Okada, T. (2023). Reduced Gaze-Cueing Effect with Neutral and Emotional Faces in Adults with Attention Deficit/hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 168, 310-317.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Vandierendonck, A. (2021). On the Utility of Integrated Speed-Accuracy Measures When Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off Is Present. Journal of Cognition, 4, Article No. 22.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Woo, J., Shidara, K., Achard, C., Tanaka, H., Nakamura, S., & Pelachaud, C. (2024). Adaptive Virtual Agent: Design and Evaluation for Real-Time Human-Agent Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 190, Article 103321.[CrossRef
[32] Yang, J., Zhou, L., & Hu, Z. (2024). Social Excluder’s Face Reduces Gaze-Triggered Attention Orienting. Psychological Research, 88, 1352-1361.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Yu, G., Herman, J. P., Katz, L. N., & Krauzlis, R. J. (2022). Microsaccades as a Marker Not a Cause for Attention-Related Modulation. eLife, 11, e74168.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Zeiträg, C., Jensen, T. R., & Osvath, M. (2022). Gaze Following: A Socio-Cognitive Skill Rooted in Deep Time. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 950935.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Zhang, S., Zhan, B., Wang, L., & Jiang, Y. (2025). Dyadic Learning Shapes Gaze-Mediated Social Attentional Orienting. Cognition, 265, Article 106280.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Zhao, W., Yang, J., & Hu, Z. (2023). Guilt-Inducing Interaction with Others Modulates Subsequent Attentional Orienting via Their Gaze. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 5348.[CrossRef] [PubMed]