沟通隐私管理理论视角下APP用户隐私边界感知的情景实验研究
A Scenario-Based Experimental Study on the Perception of Privacy Boundaries among APP Users: From the Perspective of CPM Theory
摘要: [研究背景]我国移动APP用户规模庞大,APP种类繁杂,隐私授权页面的设置存在着政策模糊、提示不明显、表述复杂等问题,不利于用户隐私更好地得到保护与尊重。[方法/过程]本研究从沟通隐私管理视角出发,基于边界协调的三个组分设计情景实验,从边界渗透、边界链接和边界所有权三方面,测量APP用户对隐私政策中不同表达在边界感知上的差异,以期为APP平台的隐私政策设计提供启示和指导。[结果/结论]研究发现,用户对隐私政策的边界感知显著受到隐私政策表达的影响,这些发现为优化隐私政策设计,使其在合规之外更能赢得用户信任与配合,提供了具体的改进方向。
Abstract: [Background] China has a vast user base for mobile applications (APPs), with a wide variety of APP types. However, the design of privacy authorization pages often suffers from issues such as vague policies, inconspicuous notifications, and complex phrasing, which are not conducive to better protection and respect for user privacy. [Method/Process] From the perspective of Communication Privacy Management (CPM) theory, this study designed a scenario-based experiment based on the three components of boundary coordination. It measured differences in APP users’ perception of privacy boundaries across various expressions in different privacy policy designs, focusing on the aspects of boundary permeability, boundary linkage, and boundary ownership. The aim is to provide insights and guidance for the design of APP platform privacy policies. [Result/Conclusion] The study found that users’ perception of privacy boundaries is significantly influenced by the expression of the privacy policies. These findings offer specific directions for improving the design of privacy policies, enabling them not only to comply with regulations but also to better earn user trust and cooperation.
文章引用:谢珍珍, 陈梅梅. 沟通隐私管理理论视角下APP用户隐私边界感知的情景实验研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2026, 16(1): 55-64. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2026.161006

参考文献

[1] 朱红灿, 彭芊芊. 隐私不确定性视角下移动APP用户隐私风险自留行为研究[J/OL]. 情报资料工作, 1-19.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1448.G3.20251023.1627.002, 2025-11-29.
[2] 李畅畅. APP个人信息保护政策困境与应对路径[J]. 信息安全研究, 2024, 10(2): 177-183.
[3] 中国互联网络信息中心. 第56次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL]. 2025-07-21.
https://cnnic.cn/n4/2025/0721/c88-11328.html, 2025-11-19.
[4] 金松. 移动APP隐私政策的实践检视与规范路径[J]. 天津法学, 2024, 40(3): 77-85.
[5] 李昕孺. APP隐私政策的缺陷及完善[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 20(3): 98-101.
[6] Warren, S.D. and Brandeis, L.D. (1890) The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193-220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Alwahaishi, S., Al-Ahmadi, M.S., Ali, Z. and Al-Jabri, I. (2024) Self-Disclosure on Social Media: Do Personality Traits Matter? Sage Open, 14, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Stone, E.F. and Stone, D.L. (1990) Privacy in Organizations: Theoretical Issues, Research Findings, and Protection Mechanisms. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 8, 349-411.
[9] 顾理平, 王芊蕴. 作为财产的隐私: 数字化社会中隐私商品化的双向机制与风险审视[J]. 国际新闻界, 2024, 46(3): 76-94.
[10] 余成峰. 平台媒介的兴起: 隐私保护的范式与悖论[J]. 东方法学, 2024(5): 74-87.
[11] 朱光, 李凤景, 沈雨萌. 社交媒体隐私政策的阅读意愿研究——基于TAM模型与自我效能理论视角[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(1): 150-166.
[12] 陈美, 穆尼热·吐拉甫, 黄容霞. 政府开放数据网站用户隐私政策阅读意愿研究——基于SEM-fsQCA的混合研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2025(4): 133-144.
[13] 王晓宁. 移动社交APP隐私政策的合规性研究——基于20例隐私政策文本的内容分析[J]. 网络安全技术与应用, 2022(1): 143-146.
[14] 李为, 沈黎, 吴檠, 等. 移动医疗APP隐私政策可读性及内容分析研究[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2022, 43(9): 25-29.
[15] 张玥, 王坚, 余姝, 等. 信息表征对移动医疗APP隐私政策阅读效果的影响研究——基于认知负荷理论[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(11): 3-13.
[16] Petronio, S. (1991) Communication Boundary Management: A Theoretical Model of Managing Disclosure of Private Information between Marital Couples. Communication Theory, 1, 311-335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Meng, X. (2024) From Interpersonal Privacy to Humantechnological Privacy: Communication Privacy Management Theory Revisited. Technical Communication, 71, 72-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 耿瑞利, 王一凡. 社交媒体用户隐私管理策略的选择与影响: 一项准实验研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(3): 94-104.
[19] 刘百灵, 孙文静. 隐私管理技术特征对移动用户信息披露意愿的影响[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(6): 1113-1123.
[20] Chang, Y., Wong, S.F. and Lee, H. (2015) Understanding Perceived Privacy: A Privacy Boundary Management Model. In: PACIS 2015 Proceedings, Association for Information Systems, 1-17.
[21] Milne, G.R. and Culnan, M.J. (2004) Strategies for Reducing Online Privacy Risks: Why Consumers Read (or Don’t Read) Online Privacy Notices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 15-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] James, T.L., Warkentin, M. and Collignon, S.E. (2015) A Dual Privacy Decision Model for Online Social Networks. Information & Management, 52, 893-908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P. and Pearo, L.K. (2004) A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network-and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 241-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Xu, H., Teo, H., Tan, B.C.Y. and Agarwal, R. (2012) Effects of Individual Self-Protection, Industry Self-Regulation, and Government Regulation on Privacy Concerns: A Study of Location-Based Services. Information Systems Research, 23, 1342-1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef