城市地下管网非开挖修复技术的力学适应性与工程应用
Mechanical Adaptability and Engineering Applications of Trenchless Rehabilitation Technologies for Urban Underground Pipeline Networks
摘要: 针对城市地下管网老化、泄漏等问题,传统开挖修复技术存在施工周期长、对环境扰动大等弊端,非开挖修复技术因其微创优势得到广泛应用。为揭示不同非开挖修复技术的力学适应性规律,指导工程选型与施工优化,本文系统梳理主流非开挖修复技术(CIPP内衬、折叠内衬、喷涂修复、机械制管法)的技术原理,通过室内试验与数值模拟分析其力学性能(抗压强度、抗裂性、界面粘结强度)及在复杂工况(不同管径、土壤压力、地下水作用)下的适应性;结合3个典型工程案例,验证技术应用效果,并提出力学性能优化路径。研究表明:CIPP 内衬技术在DN400-DN1200管径管道中力学适应性最优,修复后管道环刚度可达12 kN/m2以上;喷涂修复技术对不规则断面管道适配性强,但抗冲击性能较弱(冲击强度仅1.2 kJ/m2);机械制管法在高地下水压力工况下(水压>0.8 MPa)稳定性优于其他技术。本文成果可为城市地下管网非开挖修复工程的技术选型、力学性能设计及施工质量控制提供理论支撑与工程参考。
Abstract: Aiming at the problems of aging and leakage of urban underground pipe networks, traditional excavation repair technology has drawbacks such as long construction period and great environmental disturbance. Trenchless rehabilitation technology has been widely used due to its minimally invasive advantages. To reveal the mechanical adaptability laws of different trenchless rehabilitation technologies and guide engineering selection and construction optimization, this paper systematically sorts out the technical principles of mainstream trenchless rehabilitation technologies (CIPP lining, fold-and-form lining, spray-on lining, mechanical pipe bursting). Through laboratory tests and numerical simulation, their mechanical properties (compressive strength, crack resistance, interface bonding strength) and adaptability under complex working conditions (different pipe diameters, soil pressure, groundwater action) are analyzed. Combined with 3 typical engineering cases, the technical application effect is verified, and the optimization path of mechanical performance is proposed. The results show that the CIPP lining technology has the best mechanical adaptability in pipes with diameters of DN400-DN1200, and the ring stiffness of the repaired pipe can reach more than 12 kN/m2; the spray-on lining technology has strong adaptability to pipes with irregular cross-sections, but its impact resistance is weak (impact strength is only 1.2 kJ/m2); the mechanical pipe bursting technology has better stability than other technologies under high groundwater pressure conditions (water pressure > 0.8 MPa). The results of this paper can provide theoretical support and engineering reference for the technical selection, mechanical performance design and construction quality control of urban underground pipe network trenchless rehabilitation projects.
文章引用:王飞. 城市地下管网非开挖修复技术的力学适应性与工程应用[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(2): 51-59. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.152024

参考文献

[1] 李存权, 王鹏. 城市地下管网非开挖修复技术现状与发展趋势[J]. 给水排水, 2020, 56(7): 1-7.
[2] 张辰, 周军. 非开挖修复技术在市政管道工程中的应用[J]. 施工技术, 2019, 48(12): 102-105.
[3] ASTM F1216-2017 (2017) Standard Practice for Installation of Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) Lining for Rehabilitation of Existing Pipelines.
[4] 王云江, 刘刚. 喷涂修复技术在腐蚀管道中的力学性能研究[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(5): 189-196.
[5] Müller, H. and Schmidt, R. (2018) Long-Term Mechanical Performance of CIPP Liners in Sewer Pipelines. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 9, Article ID: 04018007.
[6] Tanaka, Y. and Suzuki, T. (2019) Development of Fold-And-Form Lining Technology for Large-Diameter Pipelines. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 86, 213-221.
[7] 李海生, 赵伟. 基于ANSYS的CIPP内衬修复管道力学性能模拟[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(3): 876-882.
[8] 吴刚, 侯士通, 张建, 等. 城市生命线工程安全多层次监测体系与预警技术研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2023, 56(11): 1-15.
[9] 孙思男, 郭恩栋, 吴厚礼, 等. 城市地下管网地震灾害情景可视化方法研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2021, 30(4): 102-109.
[10] 郁片红, 崔昱. 《排水检查井非开挖修复工程技术规程》关键技术解读[J]. 给水排水, 2024, 60(S1): 818-821.
[11] 杨毅. 全新的《规范》更高的标准——参与编修《给水排水管道工程施工及验收规范》之体会[J]. 城镇供水, 2010(3): 9-14.
[12] 刘静, 薛腾飞. 城镇排水管道非开挖修复技术研究[J]. 建材发展导向, 2024, 22(10): 107-110.
[13] 陈卫平, 李静. 非开挖修复技术在老旧管网改造中的应用与优化[J]. 中国市政工程, 2022, 40(2): 45-49.
[14] 曹子行, 王飞, 杨琪, 等. 基于Blender和Python的三维地下管网建模技术应用[J]. 中国给水排水, 2025, 41(24): 70-76.
[15] 王凯, 刘鹏飞. 城市级地下管网BIM建设及应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2022(11): 132-134.
[16] 郝技. 非开挖修复技术在市政供水管网改造中的应用[J]. 中国给水排水, 2025, 41(14): 101-106.
[17] 旷小军, 陈国卿. 浅谈城镇排水管道非开挖修复技术[J]. 人民黄河, 2021, 43(S2): 255-256, 258.