应急志愿服务绩效结果的异质性研究——基于“协同–专业”框架的多案例比较
A Study on the Heterogeneity of Performance Outcomes in Emergency Volunteer Services—A Multi-Case Comparison Based on the “Collaboration-Specialization” Framework
摘要: 面对频发的灾害事件,应急志愿服务作为政府救援力量的补充,在迅速响应、调配资源、心理疏导、灾后重建等方面展现出独特价值与不可或缺的作用,但此类行动参与救灾的有效性仍待厘清。本文使用类型学研究方法,从“协同性”和“专业化”两个维度来解释现实中应急志愿服务行动的多种绩效结果,并就出现的绩效结果占优、绩效结果显现、绩效结果偏离、绩效结果失效四种情况进行案例分析。通过对我国抗洪救灾场景下4家志愿服务组织参与救灾的过程、面临问题及绩效结果的分析,初步解释和验证了协同性与专业化塑造的多种绩效结果,并预测不同组织类型在应急网络中的可能角色与行动路径。
Abstract: In response to frequent disaster events, emergency volunteer services, as a supplement to government rescue efforts, demonstrate unique value and indispensable roles in rapid response, resource allocation, psychological support, and post-disaster reconstruction. However, the effectiveness of such actions in disaster relief remains to be clarified. This paper adopts a typological research approach to explain the diverse performance outcomes of emergency volunteer services in practice, based on the two dimensions of “collaboration” and “specialization”. It further conducts case analyses of four performance scenarios: superior performance, emergent performance, deviated performance, and ineffective performance. Through an examination of the processes, challenges, and performance outcomes of four volunteer service organizations involved in flood rescue operations in China, this study preliminarily explains and verifies the multiple performance outcomes shaped by collaboration and specialization, and predicts the possible roles and action paths of different organization types in the emergency network.
文章引用:袁文霞. 应急志愿服务绩效结果的异质性研究——基于“协同–专业”框架的多案例比较[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(2): 88-95. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.152109

参考文献

[1] 汪伟全. 社区应急志愿者参与公共安全治理的影响因素分析——基于新冠肺炎疫情背景的Nvivo质性研究[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2021(4): 46-55.
[2] 任慧颖. 应急志愿服务的多主体-全过程联动研究——基于公共危机协同治理理论的视角[J]. 理论学刊, 2022(1): 152-160.
[3] 王法硕. 我国应急志愿服务协同治理的实践与对策[J]. 学习与实践, 2014(11): 66-74.
[4] Huxham, C. (2003) Theorizing Collaboration Practice. Public Management Review, 5, 401-423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Vangen, S. (2016) Developing Practice‐Oriented Theory on Collaboration: A Paradox Lens. Public Administration Review, 77, 263-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Sullivan, H., Williams, P. and Jeffares, S. (2012) Leadership for Collaboration. Situated Agency in Practice. Public Management Review, 14, 41-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 张勤, 艾小燕. 志愿服务在重大突发事件中的应急联动新探索[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(10): 147-152.
[8] 程慧, 贾广宇. 志愿服务参与应急管理的联动机制探析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 36(1): 113-120.
[9] 邢占军, 曹玉梅, 王晓武. 志愿服务组织有效性的维度及影响机制研究[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 72(3): 139-153.
[10] 陆亚娜. 我国第三部门参与应对突发事件的“阿基里斯之踵”及其消解路径[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2015(6): 116-122.
[11] 王薇, 罗淑译, 吴晓蕾. 应急志愿组织可持续发展研究[J]. 科学社会主义, 2020(2): 130-137.
[12] 张强, 张元. 中国应急志愿服务发展现状与前瞻——基于新冠肺炎疫情应对的观察[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 42(4): 99-103.
[13] 高艳蓉. 国外应急志愿服务的特点及经验借鉴[J]. 中国青年研究, 2015(8): 117-119.
[14] 美琴, 马超峰. 社会组织的独立性: 合法与有效间的策略选择[J]. 学习与实践, 2014(12): 25-45.
[15] 孙莉莉, 钟杨. 社会组织参与社会治理的绩效评估: 理论框架和评估模型[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2018(5): 117-121.
[16] Robertson, P.J. and Choi, T. (2012) Deliberation, Consensus, and Stakeholder Satisfaction: A Simulation of Collaborative Governance. Public Management Review, 14, 83-103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Boin, A., Kuipers, S. and Overdijk, W. (2013) Leadership in Times of Crisis: A Framework for Assessment. International Review of Public Administration, 18, 79-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, 12.
[19] Krogh, A.H. and Lo, C. (2023) Managing Spontaneous Volunteers during Emergency Response: The Role of Trust. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 97, Article ID: 104010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Bianchi, C., Nasi, G. and Rivenbark, W.C. (2021) Implementing Collaborative Governance: Models, Experiences, and Challenges. Public Management Review, 23, 1581-1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef