宿舍社会排斥对大学生亲社会行为的影响——一个有调节的中介模型
The Impact of Dormitory Social Exclusion on College Students’ Prosocial Behavior—A Moderated Mediation Model
摘要: 大学宿舍作为大学生社会化过程中的关键微系统,其内部的人际互动质量对个体的心理适应与发展具有重要影响。本研究基于社会排斥的“需求威胁模型”与Rahim的“冲突应对理论”,构建一个有调节的中介模型,旨在检验宿舍情境中社会排斥影响大学生亲社会行为过程中,冲突应对方式的中介作用与共情的调节作用。采用问卷法对410名在校住宿大学生进行调查。结果发现:(1) 在控制人口学变量后,社会排斥能直接负向预测亲社会行为;(2) 冲突应对方式在社会排斥与亲社会行为之间起多重并行中介作用。合作应对与竞争应对承担显著的负向中介作用,而顺从应对则呈现独特的正向中介效应,回避应对的中介作用不显著;(3) 共情调节了社会排斥通过合作应对影响亲社会行为的间接路径。简单斜率分析表明,社会排斥对合作应对的负向预测作用仅在共情水平较高的个体中显著,而在共情水平较低的个体中不显著。本研究揭示了宿舍社会排斥影响亲社会行为的复杂路径,并明确了共情在其中的调节角色,为理解宿舍人际互动及开展针对性干预提供了依据。
Abstract: As a critical microsystem within the socialization process of university students, the quality of interpersonal interactions within dormitories significantly influences individuals’ psychological adjustment and development. Grounded in the “Need-Threat Model” of social exclusion and Rahim’s “Conflict Management Theory,” this study constructs a moderated mediation model to examine the mediating role of conflict management styles and the moderating role of empathy in the relationship between social exclusion in dormitory settings and prosocial behavior among university students. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 410 on-campus residential university students. The results indicate that: (1) After controlling for demographic variables, social exclusion directly and negatively predicts prosocial behavior; (2) Conflict management styles play multiple parallel mediating roles in the relationship between social exclusion and prosocial behavior. Cooperative and competitive approaches serve as significant negative mediators, whereas accommodating style exhibits a unique positive mediating effect. The mediating effect of avoiding style is not significant; (3) Empathy moderates the indirect pathway through which social exclusion influences prosocial behavior via cooperative conflict management. Simple slope analysis reveals that the negative predictive effect of social exclusion on cooperative conflict management is significant only among individuals with higher levels of empathy and non-significant among those with lower empathy levels. This study elucidates the complex pathways through which social exclusion in dormitories affects prosocial behavior and clarifies the moderating role of empathy, providing insights for understanding interpersonal dynamics in dormitories and developing targeted interventions.
文章引用:陈慧容, 蒲少华 (2026). 宿舍社会排斥对大学生亲社会行为的影响——一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学进展, 16(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.162077

参考文献

[1] 程苏, 刘璐, 郑涌(2011). 社会排斥的研究范式与理论模型. 心理科学进展, 19(6), 905-915.
[2] 杜建政, 夏冰丽(2008). 心理学视野中的社会排斥. 心理科学进展, 16(6), 981-986.
[3] 付春新(2012). 大学生宿舍人际冲突及其解决策略研究. 阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版), (6), 132-136.
[4] 耿炎(2019). 大学生宿舍人际冲突的现状调查——基于人口学变量. 太原城市职业技术学院学报, (6), 46-48.
[5] 古若雷, 何越, 崔芳(2025). 共情与亲社会行为的关系再思考. 科学通报, 70(8), 982-990.
[6] 郝雨, 朱媛媛(2016). 冲突与协商: 私人空间兼公共空间的大学生宿舍. 南通大学学报·社会科学版, 32(5), 98-103.
[7] 胡月萱(2024). 早期逆境对初中生亲社会行为的影响: 共情的中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 成都: 四川师范大学.
[8] 贾晓宾(2009). 大学生宿舍人际冲突处理方式问卷的编制及应用. 硕士学位论文, 西安: 陕西师范大学.
[9] 金佩琳(2025). 青少年友谊嫉妒对亲社会行为的影响及作用机制. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 上海师范大学.
[10] 寇彧, 洪慧芳, 谭晨, 李磊(2007). 青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订. 心理发展与教育, (1), 112-117.
[11] 梁洁(2016). 大学生宿舍人际冲突的现状调查——基于人口学变量. 硕士学位论文, 太原: 山西大学.
[12] 林培钿(2023). 社会排斥对亲社会行为的影响及其作用机制. 硕士学位论文, 桂林: 广西师范大学.
[13] 田一迪(2024). 大学生被动攻击行为量表修订及初步应用. 硕士学位论文, 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学.
[14] 王婷, 赵冬梅(2023). 大学生抑郁情绪与宿舍人际冲突处理方式关系的随访研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 37(8), 710-716.
[15] 吴惠君, 张姝玥, 曾宇倩(2013). 大学生社会排斥问卷的编制与信效度检验. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(12), 1829-1831.
[16] 杨露(2022). 云南师范大学女大学生宿舍人际冲突现状调查与改进路径研究. 硕士学位论文, 昆明: 云南师范大学.
[17] 杨荣(2005). 大学生宿舍人际关系诊断量表的编制. 中国学校卫生, 26(6), 473-475.
[18] 杨晓莉, 魏丽(2017). 社会排斥总是消极的吗?——影响排斥不同行为反应的因素. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(6), 1179-1183.
[19] 袁博, 刘怡畅, 库婷婷(2024). 感知社会善念对青少年亲社会行为的影响. 心理科学, 47(5), 1153-1162.
[20] 张凤凤, 董毅, 汪凯, 詹志禹, 谢伦芳(2010). 中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 155-157.
[21] 周春芬, 高猛, 史晓婷(2020). 大学生宿舍人际关系对自杀风险的影响: 孤独感的中介作用. 临床精神医学杂志, 30(3), 201-204.
[22] 祝婷, 李凌智, 温芳芳, 佐斌, 鞠一琰, 龙佳慧(2024). 共同内群体认同的心理效应及其影响因素. 理科学, 47(2), 440-449.
[23] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
[24] Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44.[CrossRef
[25] de Wied, M., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Empathy and Conflict Resolution in Friendship Relations among Adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 48-55.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2012). Putting Together Phylogenetic and Ontogenetic Perspectives on Empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 1-24.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] DeWall, C. N., Twenge, J. M., Bushman, B., Im, C., & Williams, K. (2009). A Little Acceptance Goes a Long Way: Applying Social Impact Theory to the Rejection-Aggression Link. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 168-174.[CrossRef
[28] Kahn, W. J., & Lawhorne, C. V. (2003). Empathy: The Critical Factor in Conflict-Resolution and a Culture of Civility. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81, 31-39.
[29] Kordnoghabi, R., Moradi, S., & Beiranvand, A. D. (2017). The Role of Empathy, Communication Skills and Conflict Resolution in Reducing Adolescents’ Aggressive Behavior: Violence at Schools. Biannual Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 12, 172-185.[CrossRef
[30] Lin, S., Su, W., Wang, Y., & Bai, L. (2025). Can We Return Good for Evil? A Meta‐Analysis of Social Exclusion and Prosocial Behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 64, e12879.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does Social Exclusion Motivate Interpersonal Reconnection? Resolving the “Porcupine Problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42-55.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Oliveira, R. M. d., & Beuren, I. M. (2024). Cooperative or Competitive Style of Conflict Management? Effects on Information Sharing and Agricultural Cooperatives’ Performance. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 22, e2023-0129.[CrossRef
[33] Rahim, M. A. (1983). A Measure of Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368-376.[CrossRef
[34] Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social Exclusion Decreases Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56-66.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Vallette d’Osia, A., & Meier, L. L. (2024). Empathy in the Workplace: Disentangling Affective from Cognitive Empathy. Occupational Health Science, 8, 883-904.[CrossRef
[36] Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The Power of Silence. Guilford Press.
[37] Yang, X., Bao, Y., & Wang, D. (2024). Empirical Study of the Effect of Dormitory Conflict on Dormitory Exclusion—The Mediation Role of Competition. Psychology, 15, 1728-1741.[CrossRef