当“形似真人”适得其反:虚拟主播拟真度与期望违背效应
When “Looking Human” Backfires: Virtual Streamer Realism and Expectation Violations
摘要: 人工智能技术正在重塑传统的电商直播,虚拟主播为直播营销注入新活力。然而,现有研究关于虚拟主播形态和行为拟真度如何营销消费者购买意愿,缺乏系统的理论框架和实证支持。本研究基于期望违背理论,提出形态锚定期望,行为提供证据的认知评价模型。通过2 × 2的情境模拟实验,考察不同拟真度组合对购买意愿的影响。研究发现,形态和行为拟真度存在交互效应,在高形态拟真度下,低行为表现违背了由高形态设定的高期望基准,引发负向能力期望违背,导致购买意愿降低;反之,在低形态拟真度下,高行为表现因超预期的互动能力触发正向违背,提升购买意愿。中介效应检验证实,能力期望违背是连接拟真度特征和购买决策的核心心理机制。本研究揭示了拟真度效应的非单调性,为企业提出重行为表现的策略,以规避盲目追求超写实外观引发的高期望陷阱。
Abstract: Artificial intelligence technology is reshaping traditional e-commerce live streaming, with virtual streamers becoming the new norm in marketing. However, existing research lacks systematic theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence on how the form realism and behavioral realism of virtual streamers influence consumers’ purchase intentions. Based on expectancy violation theory, this study proposes a cognitive evaluation model in which form anchors expectations while behavior provides evidence. Through a 2 × 2 scenario-based experiment, the study examines the impact of different realism combinations on purchase intentions. The findings indicate a significant interaction between form and behavioral realism. Under high form realism, low behavioral performance violates the high expectations set by the form, triggering negative ability expectancy violations and reducing purchase intentions. Conversely, under low form realism, high behavioral performance exceeds expectations, leading to positive violations and increased purchase intentions. Mediation analysis confirms that ability expectancy violation is the core psychological mechanism linking realism features to purchase decisions. This study reveals the non-monotonic nature of the realism effect and advises firms to prioritize behavioral performance to avoid the high-expectation trap caused by blindly pursuing hyper-realistic appearances.
文章引用:李亚昕. 当“形似真人”适得其反:虚拟主播拟真度与期望违背效应[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(2): 101-111. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.152135

参考文献

[1] 孟陆, 刘凤军, 段珅, 赵怡君. 信息源特性视角下网红直播对受众虚拟礼物消费意愿的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(5): 319-330.
[2] Gao, W., Jiang, N. and Guo, Q. (2023) How Do Virtual Streamers Affect Purchase Intention in the Live Streaming Context? A Presence Perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, Article 103356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Liu, H., Zhang, P., Cheng, H., Hasan, N. and Chiong, R. (2025) Impact of AI-Generated Virtual Streamer Interaction on Consumer Purchase Intention: A Focus on Social Presence and Perceived Value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 85, Article 104290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Dang-Van, T., Vo-Thanh, T., Vu, T.T., Wang, J. and Nguyen, N. (2023) Do Consumers Stick with Good-Looking Broadcasters? The Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms of Motivation and Emotion. Journal of Business Research, 156, Article 113483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Chen, Y. and Li, X. (2024) Expectancy Violations and Discontinuance Behavior in Live-Streaming Commerce: Exploring Human Interactions with Virtual Streamers. Behavioral Sciences, 14, Article 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Dabiran, E., Farivar, S., Wang, F. and Grant, G. (2024) Virtually Human: Anthropomorphism in Virtual Influencer Marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, Article 103797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Go, E. and Sundar, S.S. (2019) Humanizing Chatbots: The Effects of Visual, Identity and Conversational Cues on Humanness Perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 304-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 黄敏学, 叶钰芊, 王薇. 不同类型产品下直播主播类型对消费者购买意愿和行为的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(2): 188-198.
[9] 刘洋, 李琪, 殷猛. 网络直播购物特征对消费者购买行为影响研究[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(6): 108-114.
[10] 马丽丽. 虚拟电商直播平台人机交互质量对消费者购买意愿的影响[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(6): 84-87.
[11] 肖勇波, 王旭红, 喻静, 等. 直播电商: 管理挑战与潜在研究方向[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 251-264.
[12] Miao, F., Kozlenkova, I.V., Wang, H., Xie, T. and Palmatier, R.W. (2021) An Emerging Theory of Avatar Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 86, 67-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Vaitonytė, J., Blomsma, P.A., Alimardani, M. and Louwerse, M.M. (2021) Realism of the Face Lies in Skin and Eyes: Evidence from Virtual and Human Agents. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, Article 100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Jiang, K., Zheng, J. and Luo, S. (2024) Green Power of Virtual Influencer: The Role of Virtual Influencer Image, Emotional Appeal, and Product Involvement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, Article 103660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Schuetzler, R.M., Giboney, J.S., Grimes, G.M. and Nunamaker, J.F. (2018) The Influence of Conversational Agent Embodiment and Conversational Relevance on Socially Desirable Responding. Decision Support Systems, 114, 94-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Brandtzaeg, P.B. and Følstad, A. (2018) Chatbots: Changing User Needs and Motivations. Interactions, 25, 38-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Seymour, M., Yuan, L., Dennis, A.R. and Riemer, K. (2021) Have We Crossed the Uncanny Valley? Understanding Affinity, Trustworthiness, and Preference for Realistic Digital Humans in Immersive Environments. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 591-617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Song, S.W. and Shin, M. (2022) Uncanny Valley Effects on Chatbot Trust, Purchase Intention, and Adoption Intention in the Context of E-Commerce: The Moderating Role of Avatar Familiarity. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40, 441-456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Garvey, A.M., Kim, T. and Duhachek, A. (2022) Bad News? Send an AI. Good News? Send a Human. Journal of Marketing, 87, 10-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Xiao, L. and Kumar, V. (2019) Robotics for Customer Service: A Useful Complement or an Ultimate Substitute? Journal of Service Research, 24, 9-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Burgoon, J.K. (1993) Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Na, R., Hu, A., Zeng, Q., Ge, R. and Hao, R. (2025) Unveiling the Relationship between Virtual Streamer Characteristics and Consumer Purchase Intention in Live Streaming Commerce: Insights from Source Credibility Perspective. Electronic Markets, 35, Article No. 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] McLean, G., Osei-Frimpong, K., Wilson, A. and Pitardi, V. (2020) How Live Chat Assistants Drive Travel Consumers’ Attitudes, Trust and Purchase Intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32, 1795-1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Pelau, C., Dabija, D. and Ene, I. (2021) What Makes an AI Device Human-Like? The Role of Interaction Quality, Empathy and Perceived Psychological Anthropomorphic Characteristics in the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in the Service Industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, Article 106855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Calahorra-Candao, G. and Martín-de Hoyos, M.J. (2024) The Effect of Anthropomorphism of Virtual Voice Assistants on Perceived Safety as an Antecedent to Voice Shopping. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, Article 108124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Chen, J., Li, M. and Ham, J. (2024) Different Dimensions of Anthropomorphic Design Cues: How Visual Appearance and Conversational Style Influence Users’ Information Disclosure Tendency Towards Chatbots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 190, Article 103320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Chang, Y., Zhang, C., Li, T. and Li, Y. (2023) Social Cognition of Humanoid Robots on Customer Tolerance of Service Failure. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36, 2347-2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Evangelidis, I. and Van Osselaer, S.M.J. (2018) Points of (dis)parity: Expectation Disconfirmation from Common Attributes in Consumer Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 55, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Rheu, M., Dai, Y., Meng, J. and Peng, W. (2024) When a Chatbot Disappoints You: Expectancy Violation in Human-Chatbot Interaction in a Social Support Context. Communication Research, 51, 782-814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef