薪酬激励动态性、营销战略风格与企业绩效
Compensation Incentive Dynamics, Marketing Strategy Style and Enterprise Performance
摘要: 人力资本已成为经济增长的核心战略资本,说明公司治理必须围绕人力资本及其动态性展开。本文从人力资本理论和委托代理理论出发,以中国上市公司为研究样本,实证检验高管薪酬激励动态性对营销战略风格的影响,及营销战略风格对企业绩效的作用。结果表明:高管薪酬激励动态性越显著,企业营销战略越趋于稳健;激进的营销战略虽有助于促进营业收入增长,却会显著损害企业的盈利水平,不利于企业的持续发展。本文从人力资本动态性角度,研究了高管薪酬激励动态性对公司营销战略风格的影响,揭示了营销战略风格与企业绩效之间的关联。本文丰富了动态激励相容理论并给出了可靠的经验证据,有助于从动态性的角度优化高管薪酬激励机制设计,有效应对人力资本的动态性。
Abstract: Human capital has become the core strategic capital for economic growth, which implies that corporate governance must revolve around human capital and its dynamics. Starting from the human capital theory and principal-agent theory, this paper takes Chinese listed companies as the research sample to empirically examine the impact of the dynamics of executive compensation incentives on marketing strategy style, as well as the effect of marketing strategy style on corporate performance. The results show that the more prominent the dynamics of executive compensation incentives are, the more prudent a firm’s marketing strategy tends to be; although aggressive marketing strategies help promote the growth of operating income, they significantly impair the firm’s profitability and are not conducive to its sustainable development. From the perspective of human capital dynamics, this paper studies the impact of the dynamics of executive compensation incentives on a firm’s marketing strategy style and reveals the relationship between marketing strategy style and corporate performance. This paper enriches the theory of dynamic incentive compatibility and provides reliable empirical evidence, which is helpful for optimizing the design of executive compensation incentive mechanisms from the perspective of dynamics and effectively addressing the dynamics of human capital.
文章引用:左晶晶, 王艳茹, 张晨瑜. 薪酬激励动态性、营销战略风格与企业绩效[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(2): 118-135. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.152137

参考文献

[1] Romer, P.M. (1986) Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Romer, P.M. (1990) Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 唐跃军, 左晶晶. 创业企业治理模式——基于动态股权治理平台的研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020(6): 136-147.
[4] 张金山. 人力资本、薪酬制度与企业绩效关系研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2008.
[5] 周其仁. 市场里的企业: 一个人力资本与非人力资本的特别合约[J]. 经济研究, 1996(6): 71-80.
[6] 于桂兰, 杨富华. 人力资本分享企业收益的原因与形式[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2001(12): 11-12+16.
[7] 张维迎. 所有制、治理结构及委托-代理关系——兼评崔之元和周其仁的一些观点[J]. 经济研究, 1996(9): 3-15+53.
[8] 程远亮, 黄乾. 人力资本产权激励: 知识经济时代激励制度的选择[J]. 经济经纬, 2001(4): 37-40.
[9] 张友棠. 知识经济时代人力资本的产权特征及核算方式创新[J]. 会计研究, 1999(8): 44-45+22.
[10] Holmstrom, B. (1979) Moral Hazard and Observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Jensen, M.C. and Murphy, K.J. (1990) Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 225-264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 郑森圭, 崔笑宁, 汪寿阳, 尚维. 基于动态基础薪酬的企业薪酬制度研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(4): 958-966.
[13] 朱仁宏, 周琦, 伍兆祥. 创业团队契约治理真能促进新创企业绩效吗——一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(5): 30-40.
[14] 李丽, 傅飞强. 基于现金计划的长期激励模式设计[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2014(3): 63-68.
[15] 许宏. 基于委托代理模型的企业经理人年薪制探讨[J]. 财会通讯, 2012(32): 52-53.
[16] 郭元晞. 论经营者年薪制[J]. 经济研究, 1995(11): 24-29+53.
[17] 李燕萍, 孙红, 张银. 高管报酬激励、战略并购重组与公司绩效——来自中国A股上市公司的实证[J]. 管理世界, 2008(12): 177-179.
[18] 谌新民, 刘善敏. 上市公司经营者报酬结构性差异的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2003(8): 55-63+92.
[19] 姚凯. 基于企业家工作性质的延期支付式年薪制研究[J]. 管理世界, 2008(11): 178-179.
[20] 方军雄. 我国上市公司高管的薪酬存在粘性吗? [J]. 经济研究, 2009, 44(3): 110-124.
[21] 周罗琳. 营销投入、财务杠杆与企业绩效[J]. 财会研究, 2018(2): 27-29.
[22] Markovitch, D.G., Huang, D. and Ye, P. (2020) Marketing Intensity and Firm Performance: Contrasting the Insights Based on Actual Marketing Expenditure and Its SG&A Proxy. Journal of Business Research, 118, 223-239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] 黄琦星, 温馨. 广告支出、行业竞争与公司绩效[J]. 管理学报, 2018(12): 1838-1845.
[24] Frieder, L. and Subrahmanyam, A. (2005) Brand Perceptions and the Market for Common Stock. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, 57-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Joshi, A. and Hanssens, D.M. (2018) The Direct and Indirect Effects of Advertising Spending on Firm Value. In: Hanssens, D.M., Eds., Long-Term Impact of Marketing, World Scientific, 521-556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Rao, V.R., Agarwal, M.K. and Dahlhoff, D. (2004) How Is Manifest Branding Strategy Related to the Intangible Value of a Corporation? Journal of Marketing, 68, 126-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Jindal, N. and McAlister, L. (2015) The Impacts of Advertising Assets and R&D Assets on Reducing Bankruptcy Risk. Marketing Science, 34, 555-572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Özturan, P., Özsomer, A. and Pieters, R. (2014) The Role of Market Orientation in Advertising Spending during Economic Collapse: The Case of Turkey in 2001. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 139-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Conchar, M.P., Crask, M.R. and Zinkhan, G.M. (2005) Market Valuation Models of the Effect of Advertising and Promotional Spending: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 445-460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Frankenberger, K.D., and Graham, R.C. (2004) Should Firms Increase Advertising Expenditures During Recessions? MSI Reports, 3, 65-85.
[31] 赵保国, 阙人超. 传统企业广告投入与企业绩效的非线性关系研究——基于工业企业数据的门槛分析[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(4): 92-100.
[32] Srivastava, R.K., Shervani, T.A. and Fahey, L. (1998) Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62, 2-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Kim, M. and McAlister, L.M. (2011) Stock Market Reaction to Unexpected Growth in Marketing Expenditure: Negative for Sales Force, Contingent on Spending Level for Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 75, 68-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Deleersnyder, B., Dekimpe, M.G., Steenkamp, J.E.M. and Leeflang, P.S.H. (2009) The Role of National Culture in Advertising’s Sensitivity to Business Cycles: An Investigation across Continents. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 623-636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] 郝云宏, 朱炎娟. 高管薪酬、企业营销战略倾向与企业成长——基于房地产行业上市公司的实证检验[J]. 财经论丛, 2012(6): 88-92.
[36] 唐跃军, 宋渊洋, 金立印, 左晶晶. 控股股东卷入、两权偏离与营销战略风格——基于第二类代理问题和终极控制权理论的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2012(2): 82-94.
[37] 张立, 高英智. 公司规模、营销战略风格与家族企业业绩[J]. 经济经纬, 2015(3): 120-125.
[38] 宋渊洋, 李元旭, 王宇露. 企业资源、所有权性质与国际化程度——来自中国制造业上市公司的证据[J]. 管理评论, 2011, 23(2): 53-59+92.
[39] 于东智. 股权结构、治理效率与公司绩效[J]. 中国工业经济, 2001(5): 54-62.
[40] 吕长江, 赵宇恒. 国有企业管理者激励效应研究——基于管理者权力的解释[J]. 管理世界, 2008(11): 99-109+188.
[41] 王化成, 张修平, 高升好. 企业战略影响过度投资吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(4): 87-97+110.
[42] 杨向阳, 王文平. 论国有企业人力资本的剩余索取权[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2006(10): 10-13+28.
[43] 孙世敏, 陈怡秀, 刘奕彤. 合谋掏空对高管隐性薪酬及其经济效应影响研究——考虑业绩风险与高管依附性特征[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022, 36(2): 109-122.
[44] 唐跃军, 宋渊洋. 价值选择VS.价值创造——来自中国市场机构投资者的证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2010, 9(2): 609-632.