基于克拉申“输入假说”的汉语声调教学研究——以泰国汉语学习者为例
Study on Chinese Tone Teaching Based on Krashen’s “Input Hypothesis” —A Case Study of Thai Chinese Learners
摘要: 克拉申(Krashen)的“输入假说”为第二语言习得提供了重要理论支撑,基于此理论,针对泰国汉语学习者的四个基础声调的学习难点,分析声调特征以及学习者的偏误类型,系统地探讨声调教学的有效策略。结合“输入假说”的核心原则,例如“可理解输入”“i + 1”理论等,还根据“情感过滤假说”等理论设计多模态输入、任务驱动型教学方案,提高学习者对声调的感知能力与输出能力,降低学习者的情感焦虑。
Abstract: Krashen’s “Input Hypothesis” provides important theoretical support for second language acquisition. Based on this theory, this paper focuses on the learning difficulties of the four basic tones faced by Thai learners of Chinese, analyzes the characteristics of tones and the learners’ error types, and systematically explores effective strategies for tone teaching. By integrating the core principles of the “Input Hypothesis” (such as “comprehensible input” and the “i + 1” theory) and drawing on theories like the “Affective Filter Hypothesis”, the paper also designs multimodal input and task-based teaching plans. These plans aim to improve learners’ perceptual and productive abilities in tones and reduce their affective anxiety.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李红印. 泰国学生汉语学习的语音偏误[J]. 世界汉语教学, 1995(2): 66-71.
|
|
[2]
|
Krashen, S.D. (1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman.
|
|
[3]
|
任广玉. 浅析泰韩留学生习得汉语的声调偏误[J]. 文学教育(下), 2015(3): 118-120.
|
|
[4]
|
陈孝锋, 侯孟妤. 汉、泰声调对比及泰汉语声调教学[J]. 赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版), 2016, 37(4): 267-269.
|
|
[5]
|
陈宏. 基于认知规律的汉语声调教学新认识[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(4): 361-367.
|
|
[6]
|
张婷, 彭青. 汉语和泰语声调对比研究及对泰声调教学建议[J]. 兰州交通大学学报, 2021, 40(4): 164-172.
|
|
[7]
|
刘珣. 对外汉语教育学引论[M]. 北京: 北京语言文化大学出版社, 2000: 174-175.
|
|
[8]
|
王建勤. 第二语言习得研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009: 117-119.
|
|
[9]
|
黄伯荣, 廖序东. 现代汉语下(增订6版) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2017.
|
|
[10]
|
张洪健. 对外汉语声调习得研究综述[J]. 外国语文, 2012, 28(S1): 66-68.
|
|
[11]
|
李利, 李亚娴, 康宇, 等. 声调语言经验在汉语二语者普通话声调感知中的作用[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(1): 83-91+191.
|
|
[12]
|
朱伟娟. 克拉申“输入假说”理论在对外汉语教学中的应用[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2012(6): 139-142.
|
|
[13]
|
杨蓓. 结合形式与意义的声调视听训练[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2021(3): 31-44.
|
|
[14]
|
许姗姗, 李健. 对外汉语语音教学的“翻转课堂”实践[J]. 汉字文化, 2023(S1): 170-172.
|