全球古新世–始新世极热气候事件(PETM)及其驱动机制
Global Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) and Its Driving Mechanisms
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2026.162015, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨 雪, 李冰阳, 陈筱筱, 傅义阳, 黄俊影:长江大学地球科学学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 古新世–始新世极热事件环境效应能源Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Environmental Effects Energy Resources
摘要: 古新世–始新世极热事件(PETM,约56 Ma)是新生代最典型的极端气候突变事件,涉及到全球平均气温骤升4℃~5℃、大气碳同位素负漂(Δδ13C达−2‰~−3‰)和海洋–陆地生态系统重构等变化。该事件导致全球气候表现出显著的“高纬增温放大”效应,并引发海洋酸化、陆相风化作用增强以及生物群落的重大重组。这些剧烈的环境变化也共同塑造了特定沉积矿产和油气烃源岩的形成条件。然而,现有研究仍面临沉积地层区域性局限、古气候代用指标多解性、年代学方法误差以及地球系统模拟复杂等方法论挑战。目前,关于该事件驱动机制的假说还存在许多争议:(1) 主流的海底甲烷水合物分解假说虽碳同位素证据吻合,但其古甲烷储库规模难以定量约束;(2) 地外天体撞击假说因发现铱异常和微玻璃陨石而被提出,却因缺乏全球撞击坑证据而备受质疑;(3) 其他如构造抬升致有机碳氧化、天文轨道驱动等假说,则从不同时间尺度提供了碳循环扰动的可能路径。深入解析PETM事件中碳循环–气候–生物系统的耦合机制,不仅能为理解地质历史时期极端气候演变提供关键实证,也能为评估现代温室气体排放的潜在环境效应提供至关重要的地质类比参考。
Abstract: The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM, approximately 56 Ma) represents the most typical abrupt climate change event of the Cenozoic era, characterized by a global mean temperature increase of 4˚C~5˚C, a negative excursion in atmospheric carbon isotope values (Δδ13C reaching −2‰ to −3‰), and the restructuring of marine-terrestrial ecosystems. This event resulted in a significant “high-latitude amplification of warming” globally, triggering ocean acidification, enhanced continental weathering, and major reorganization of biological communities. These pronounced environmental changes collectively shaped the conditions for the formation of specific sedimentary mineral deposits and hydrocarbon source rocks. However, existing research still faces methodological challenges, including regional limitations of sedimentary strata, multi-proxy interpretation ambiguities in paleoclimate indicators, chronological dating uncertainties, and complexities in Earth system modeling. Current hypotheses regarding the triggering mechanisms of this event remain highly debated: (1) The mainstream hypothesis of submarine methane hydrate dissociation, while consistent with carbon isotope evidence, faces difficulties in quantitatively constraining the size of the paleo-methane reservoir; (2) The extraterrestrial impact hypothesis, proposed based on observed iridium anomalies and microtektites, is heavily questioned due to the lack of global evidence for an impact crater; (3) Other hypotheses, such as tectonic uplift leading to organic carbon oxidation and astronomical orbital forcing, offer potential pathways for carbon cycle perturbations over different timescales. A deeper analysis of the coupling mechanisms between the carbon cycle, climate, and biosphere during the PETM event can not only provide critical empirical evidence for understanding extreme climate evolution in geological history but also serve as a crucial geological analog for assessing the potential environmental effects of modern greenhouse gas emissions.
文章引用:杨雪, 李冰阳, 陈筱筱, 傅义阳, 黄俊影. 全球古新世–始新世极热气候事件(PETM)及其驱动机制[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(2): 149-158. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.162015

参考文献

[1] 陈祚伶. 古新世-始新世极热事件碳循环研究进展[J]. 科学通报, 2022, 67(15): 1704-1714.
[2] 张少华, 纪伟强, 陈厚彬, 等. 显生宙大规模岩浆活动对温室期发育的制约[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2023, 42(5): 1042-1061+961+964.
[3] 金思敏. 古新世-始新世极热事件期间的火山活动和水文气候[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2023.
[4] 陈祚伶, 丁仲礼. 古新世-始新世极热事件研究进展[J]. 第四纪研究, 2011, 31(6): 937-950.
[5] 胡修棉, 李娟, 韩中, 等. 中新生代两类极热事件的环境变化、生态效应与驱动机制[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2020, 50(8): 1023-1043.
[6] 赵梦婷, 邱煜丹, 马明明. 白垩纪晚期-古近纪早期热事件研究进展[J]. 第四纪研究, 2022, 42(2): 512-528.
[7] Gibbs, S.J., Bown, P.R., Sessa, J.A., Bralower, T.J. and Wilson, P.A. (2006) Nannoplankton Extinction and Origination across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Science, 314, 1770-1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 罗星宇, 王平, 罗才蓉, 等. 古新世-始新世极热事件(PETM)的陆相记录: 现状与展望[J]. 地质论评, 2023, 69(5): 1899-1918.
[9] 王阳, 张涵宇, 朱炎铭, 等. 渤海湾盆地临清坳陷西部山西组-太原组海陆过渡相泥页岩沉积环境及有机质富集[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(5): 1090-1107.
[10] Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Pagani, M., Woltering, M., Brinkhuis, H., Damsté, J.S.S., et al. (2006) Subtropical Arctic Ocean Temperatures during the Palaeocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum. Nature, 441, 610-613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 谭先锋, 蒋威, 王敦繁, 等. 古新世-始新世极热气候下陆相沉积系统响应与油气效应研究进展[J]. 重庆科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 27(1): 44-57.
[12] 丁婷, 刘成林, 郭福生, 等. 北美板块海相钾盐沉积特征、控制因素及其对中国找钾启示[J]. 盐湖研究, 2022, 30(3): 122-130.
[13] Li, W., Tan, X., Jiang, W., Dong, X., Wang, D., Luo, L., et al. (2025) Organic Matter Accumulation and Carbon Sequestration in the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: Insights from the Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 288, Article ID: 106606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 王永达, 杨石岭, 沈冰, 等. 地球深部过程与极热和极冷事件[J]. 科学通报, 2024, 69(2): 215-229.
[15] Dickens, G.R. (2011) Down the Rabbit Hole: Toward Appropriate Discussion of Methane Release from Gas Hydrate Systems during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum and Other Past Hyperthermal Events. Climate of the Past, 7, 831-846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Cohen, A.S. and Coe, A.L. (2007) The Impact of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province on Climate and on the Sr-and Os-Isotope Evolution of Seawater. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 244, 374-390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Jones, M.T., Jerram, D.A., Svensen, H.H. and Grove, C. (2016) The Effects of Large Igneous Provinces on the Global Carbon and Sulphur Cycles. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 441, 4-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Berndt, C., Planke, S., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Frieling, J., Jones, M.T., Millett, J.M., et al. (2023) Shallow-Water Hydrothermal Venting Linked to the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Nature Geoscience, 16, 803-809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Jiang, S., Cui, Y., Wang, Y., De Palma, M., Naafs, B.D.A., Jiang, J., et al. (2025) Millennial-Timescale Thermogenic CO2 Release Preceding the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Nature Communications, 16, Article No. 5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Kender, S., Bogus, K., Pedersen, G.K., Dybkjær, K., Mather, T.A., Mariani, E., et al. (2021) Paleocene/Eocene Carbon Feedbacks Triggered by Volcanic Activity. Nature Communications, 12, Article No. 5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Hovikoski, J., Fyhn, M.B.W., Nøhr-Hansen, H., Hopper, J.R., Andrews, S., Barham, M., et al. (2021) Paleocene-Eocene Volcanic Segmentation of the Norwegian-Greenland Seaway Reorganized High-Latitude Ocean Circulation. Communications Earth & Environment, 2, Article No. 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Meissner, K.J. and Bralower, T.J. (2017) Volcanism Caused Ancient Global Warming. Nature, 548, 531-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Jones, S.M., Hoggett, M., Greene, S.E. and Dunkley Jones, T. (2019) Large Igneous Province Thermogenic Greenhouse Gas Flux Could Have Initiated Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Climate Change. Nature Communications, 10, Article No. 5547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Gutjahr, M., Ridgwell, A., Sexton, P.F., Anagnostou, E., Pearson, P.N., Pälike, H., et al. (2017) Very Large Release of Mostly Volcanic Carbon during the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Nature, 548, 573-577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Svensen, H., Planke, S., Malthe-Sørenssen, A., Jamtveit, B., Myklebust, R., Rasmussen Eidem, T., et al. (2004) Release of Methane from a Volcanic Basin as a Mechanism for Initial Eocene Global Warming. Nature, 429, 542-545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Higgins, J.A. and Schrag, D.P. (2006) Beyond Methane: Towards a Theory for the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 245, 523-537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Zachos, J.C., Röhl, U., Schellenberg, S.A., Sluijs, A., Hodell, D.A., Kelly, D.C., et al. (2005) Rapid Acidification of the Ocean during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Science, 308, 1611-1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Liu, X., Sun, X., Sun, W., Hao, Y. and Huang, J. (2025) A Link between the Paleoenvironment and PETM via Trace Element Proxies in Southwest Atlantic Sediments. Global and Planetary Change, 248, 104774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Frieling, J., Svensen, H.H., Planke, S., Cramwinckel, M.J., Selnes, H. and Sluijs, A. (2016) Thermogenic Methane Release as a Cause for the Long Duration of the PETM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 12059-12064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Zhu, M., Ding, Z., Wang, X., Chen, Z., Jiang, H., Dong, X., et al. (2010) High-Resolution Carbon Isotope Record for the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum from the Nanyang Basin, Central China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55, 3606-3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Kirtland Turner, S., Hull, P.M., Kump, L.R. and Ridgwell, A. (2017) A Probabilistic Assessment of the Rapidity of PETM Onset. Nature Communications, 8, Article No. 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Storey, M., Duncan, R.A. and Swisher, C.C. (2007) Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum and the Opening of the Northeast Atlantic. Science, 316, 587-589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Zeebe, R.E., Zachos, J.C. and Dickens, G.R. (2009) Carbon Dioxide Forcing Alone Insufficient to Explain Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Warming. Nature Geoscience, 2, 576-580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] 金思敏, David B. Kemp, 张仲石, 等. 古新世-始新世极热事件期间的浊积岩沉积对气候变化和天文旋回的响应[J]. 第四纪研究, 2024, 44(5): 1225-1234.
[35] 李明松, 姚炜琪, 沈俊, 等. 古新世-始新世极热事件时期轨道尺度海洋脱氧的时空演化[J]. 中国基础科学, 2024, 26(3): 24-30.
[36] 王建, 周新郢, 李小强. 古新世-始新世暖期北半球野火演化研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2024, 44(1): 1-16.
[37] 杨晨, 林雯洁, 金思敏, 等. 汞示踪古新世-始新世极热事件火山沉积记录研究进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2025, 43(6): 1935-1951.
[38] 王学婷, 陈祚伶, 崔琳琳, 等. 中国大陆古新世-始新世极热事件时期野火的时空演变[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2025, 55(2): 524-536.
[39] 赵玉龙, 刘志飞. 古新世-始新世最热事件对地球表层循环的影响及其触发机制[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007(4): 341-349.
[40] 马昌前, 邹博文, 黄贵治. 火山喷发机制、气候效应及火山地球工程[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(11): 4114-4121.