唐代拟判背后的选官文化与法律意识
The Culture of Official Selection and Legal Consciousness behind Simulated Judgments in the Tang Dynasty
摘要: 判是古代的一类司法文书,除了司法审判中产生的实判,唐代司法、文学与选官制度的发达还造就了拟判的繁荣。本文在梳理判文发展历史流变的基础上,以白居易《百道判》为研究对象,分析拟判在文本与思想上的特点,探究拟判背后唐代的社会法律意识、儒法关系以及选官标准,从多个角度挖掘唐代拟判的历史价值。
Abstract: Pan was a type of judicial document in ancient times. In addition to the practical judgments produced in judicial trials, the development of the Tang Dynasty’s judicial system, literature, and official selection system also gave rise to the prosperity of simulated judgments (ni pan). Based on an overview of the historical evolution of judgment documents, this paper takes Bai Juyi’s “One Hundred Simulated Judgments” as the research subject. It analyzes the textual and ideological characteristics of simulated judgments, explores the social legal consciousness, the relationship between Confucianism and law, and the criteria for official selection reflected in them. Furthermore, it delves into the historical value of simulated judgments in the Tang Dynasty from multiple perspectives.
文章引用:王莞尔. 唐代拟判背后的选官文化与法律意识[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(2): 347-353. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.152139

参考文献

[1] 徐师曾, 撰, 罗根泽, 点校. 文体明辨序说[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1962: 127.
[2] 中华书局编辑部, 主编. 唐宋注疏十三经[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1998: 337.
[3] 高汉成. 秋决狱与法律解释——以董仲舒春秋决狱案例为中心的考察[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 72(5): 126-139.
[4] 吴承学. 唐代判文文体及源流研究[J]. 文学遗产, 1999(6): 21-33.
[5] 杜佑. 通典[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1984: 84.
[6] 蹇长春. “百道判”及其学术价值——兼论白居易的早期思想[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 1984(3): 44-56.
[7] 元稹. 元稹集[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1982: 554.
[8] 白居易. 白居易集笺校[M]. 朱金成, 笺校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1988: 3571-3572.
[9] 黄源盛. 汉唐法制与儒家传统[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2020: 494.
[10] 马小红. “经义折狱”与中国传统法的精神[J]. 中西法律传统, 2006(2): 207.
[11] 马端临. 文献通考[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1986: 354.