《运筹学》课程“三位一体”育人模式探索
Exploration of the “Three-in-One” Cultivation Model for the Course of Operations Research
摘要: 针对《运筹学》教学中存在的“重理论推导轻实际应用、学用脱节以及思政引导不够”等现实问题,本研究以成果导向教育(OBE)理念为基础,设计了一套将知识传授、能力培养与价值观引导结合在一起的教学模式。改革主要从内容、方法和评价三个方面展开。在内容上,通过讲好学科历史来弘扬科学精神,分析核心算法中的科学思维方法,并与国家战略相对接。在教学方法上,利用线上平台建立了“课前–课中–课后”三阶段联动的线上线下混合教学模式。在考核评价上,建立了过程性评价和总结性评价相结合的综合评价体系。实践证明,这种模式增强了学生的学习兴趣和主动性,培养了他们解决复杂问题的能力,让专业课教学与思政教育同频共振,为相关课程的教学改革提供了参考。
Abstract: In response to the practical problems existing in the teaching of Operations Research, such as the emphasis on theoretical derivation over practical application, the disconnection between learning and application, and insufficient ideological and political guidance, this study, based on the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) concept, has designed a teaching model that integrates knowledge transmission, ability cultivation, and value guidance. The reform is mainly carried out in three aspects: content, method, and evaluation. In terms of content, the scientific spirit is promoted by telling the history of the discipline, the scientific thinking methods in core algorithms are analyzed, and they are connected with national strategies. In terms of teaching methods, an online and offline hybrid teaching model of “before class, during class, after class” three-stage linkage is established through online platforms. In terms of assessment and evaluation, a comprehensive evaluation system combining process evaluation and summative evaluation is established. Practice has proved that this model has enhanced students’ learning interest and initiative, cultivated their ability to solve complex problems, and enabled professional course teaching and ideological and political education to resonate at the same frequency, providing a reference for the teaching reform of related courses.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
International Engineering Alliance Secretariat. 25 Years of the Washington Accord: Celebrating International Engineering Education Standards and Recognition 1989-2014. https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/History/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL.pdf
|
|
[2]
|
王莉, 庄育锋. 课程思政视域下“三位一体”的课程教学创新探索——以“运筹学”课程为例[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2023(48): 17-22.
|
|
[3]
|
孟伟. 运筹学课程线上线下混合式教学模式的实践研究[J]. 科技视界, 2020(21): 13-14.
|
|
[4]
|
覃毅延, 东方. 管理类专业中运筹学课程教学探索[J]. 物流工程与管理, 2018, 40(1): 179-180.
|
|
[5]
|
许建虹, 陈士涛, 古清月. 运筹学课程思政元素的挖掘与探索[J]. 大学, 2020(27): 138-139.
|
|
[6]
|
柏庆国, 韩琳, 徐健腾. 管理科学专业运筹学课程教学融入思政元素的路径探索与实践[J]. 物流工程与管理, 2024, 46(4): 144-148.
|
|
[7]
|
刘慧, 李梦韩, 冷凯君, 等. 融合OBE与课程思政的管理运筹学教学探索与实践[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 21(9): 157-160.
|
|
[8]
|
薛文. OBE理论下《物流运筹学》课程思政教学设计与实施研究[J]. 中国物流与采购, 2023(24): 47-48.
|
|
[9]
|
张杰, 孙晓宇. 基于产出导向的《运筹学》在线开放课程资源建设[J]. 教育现代化, 2018, 5(20): 287-289.
|
|
[10]
|
柳玉寿, 马蓉, 何亮. Web2.0环境下基于SECI模型的数据模型与决策教学模式探究[J]. 经济师, 2020(9): 188-189+191.
|
|
[11]
|
刘秋杰. 工科《运筹学》课程思政实践案例设计研究[J]. 四川文理学院学报, 2024, 34(4): 126-130.
|
|
[12]
|
张晓磊, 李晶, 宋剑奇. 学生成绩视角下“一课多师”教学效果研究——以数据模型与决策课程为例[J]. 品位∙经典, 2023(7): 158-161.
|
|
[13]
|
解百臣, 姜笑, 张璨, 等. 数据模型决策类课程教学质量提高关键因素研究——基于运筹学的实证分析[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(5): 413-421.
|
|
[14]
|
苗华, 李红梅, 黄继平. 运筹学实验课程教学思路探讨[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2017(3): 112-114.
|