使用无人机侵犯公共场所隐私权的违法性分析
An Analysis of the Illegality of Infringing upon the Right to Privacy in Public Places by Using Drones
摘要: 无人机技术的普及与低空经济的发展,使得行为人在公共场所使用无人机拍摄的行为日益普遍,传统“公共场所无隐私”的观念已难以适应现实需求,由此引发的公共场所使用无人机隐私权侵权争议日益普遍,亟待法律层面的回应。公共场所隐私权的存在是违法性认定的权利基础,在违法性判断标准上,相较于结果不法说,行为不法说更契合公共场所隐私权的保护需求,通过合理隐私期待标准与隐私场景一致性原则界定行为边界,结合飞行场景敏感性、无人机技术性能与使用方式、被拍摄对象可识别性及是否采取预防措施等核心因素进行综合考量,进而从法定、技术、理性人三个维度构建了违法性判断的注意义务体系。厘清无人机使用行为的合法与违法边界,为相关侵权纠纷的法律适用提供理论支撑,助力平衡技术发展与隐私权益保护的关系。
Abstract: The popularization of drone technology and the development of the low-altitude economy have made the act of shooting with drones in public places increasingly common. The traditional notion that “there is no privacy in public places” has become difficult to meet practical needs, thus leading to a growing number of disputes over privacy infringement caused by the use of drones in public places, which urgently requires a legal response. The existence of the right to privacy in public places constitutes the right-based foundation for the determination of illegality. In terms of the criteria for judging illegality, compared with the theory of unlawful result, the theory of unlawful act is more in line with the needs of protecting the right to privacy in public places. It defines the boundaries of conduct through the reasonable expectation of privacy standard and the principle of privacy scenario consistency, and conducts a comprehensive assessment by integrating core factors such as the sensitivity of the flight scenario, the technical performance and mode of use of the drone, the identifiability of the photographed subject, and whether preventive measures have been taken. Furthermore, it constructs a duty of care system for illegality judgment from three dimensions: statutory compliance, technical norms, and reasonable person standard. Clarifying the boundary between legal and illegal drone use behaviors provides theoretical support for the application of law in relevant infringement disputes, and helps balance the relationship between technological development and the protection of privacy rights and interests.
文章引用:刘世澳. 使用无人机侵犯公共场所隐私权的违法性分析[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(2): 79-86. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.142047

参考文献

[1] 张金海. 论违法性要件的独立[J]. 清华法学, 2007(4): 82-95.
[2] 傅强, 刘宇航. 公共场所隐私权法律保护研究——以公共场所摄像头的管理为视角[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 27(4): 103-109.
[3] 李延舜. 公共场所隐私权研究——法理、要素及类型[J]. 法学论坛, 2018, 33(6): 94-104.
[4] 方新军. 权益区分保护和违法性要件[J]. 南大法学, 2021(2): 1-23.
[5] 杨德桥. 论违法性要件的独立及其实现[J]. 北方法学, 2010, 4(5): 78-86.
[6] Nissenbaum, H. (2004) Privacy as Contextual Integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 119.
[7] 海伦·尼森鲍姆, 王苑. 何为场景?——隐私场景理论中场景概念之解析[J]. 网络信息法学研究, 2021(1): 3-28+236.
[8] 张民安. 公共场所隐私权研究——公共场所隐私权理论的产生、发展、确立、争议和具体适用[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2016.
[9] 叶金强. 私法中理性人标准之构建[J]. 法学研究, 2015, 37(1): 101-114.
[10] 寇广萍. 侵权责任法[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2017.
[11] 王利明. 侵权责任法[M]. 第二版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021.