数据要素驱动乡村振兴的机制与测度——基于青海的实证
Mechanism and Measurement of Rural Revitalization Driven by Data Factors—An Empirical Study Based on Qinghai Province
摘要: 本研究旨在探讨数据要素驱动西部民族地区(以青海省为例)乡村振兴的机制与测度。文章首先基于“产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕”五个维度构建了包含20项指标的乡村振兴评价体系。研究采用2004年至2023年的青海省时间序列数据,运用层次分析法(AHP)和熵权法相结合的方式测度乡村振兴水平。随后,通过主成分分析法(PCA)合成数字要素指标,并建立多元线性回归模型(逐步回归),实证分析数据要素及其他控制变量对乡村振兴的影响。研究结果显示,数据要素、人均GDP增长率、财政农林支出等对乡村振兴有显著正向影响,而城镇登记失业率则呈现负向影响。最后,文章据此提出了加强数字基础设施建设、优化财政支出结构等政策建议。
Abstract: This study aims to explore the mechanism and measurement of rural revitalization driven by data factors in western ethnic minority regions (taking Qinghai Province as an example). Firstly, the paper constructs a rural revitalization evaluation system including 20 indicators based on the five dimensions of “prosperous industry, livable ecology, civilized rural customs, effective governance, and affluent life”. Using time series data of Qinghai Province from 2004 to 2023, the study measures the level of rural revitalization by combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Entropy Weight Method (EWM). Subsequently, the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used to synthesize digital factor indicators, and a multiple linear regression model (stepwise regression) is established. Combined with heterogeneity analysis, threshold effect analysis and endogeneity treatment, the impact of data factors and other control variables on rural revitalization is empirically tested. The results show that data factors, per capita GDP growth rate, and fiscal expenditure on agriculture and forestry have significant positive impacts on rural revitalization, while the urban registered unemployment rate has a negative impact. Finally, the paper puts forward policy suggestions such as strengthening the construction of digital infrastructure and optimizing the structure of fiscal expenditure.
文章引用:刘泽宇. 数据要素驱动乡村振兴的机制与测度——基于青海的实证[J]. 统计学与应用, 2026, 15(2): 139-154. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2026.152042

参考文献

[1] 李标, 孙琨, 孙根紧. 数据要素参与收入分配: 理论分析、事实依据与实践路径[J]. 改革, 2022(3): 66-76.
[2] 王珏, 许士道. 社会主义市场经济下数据要素参与收入分配的政治经济学分析[J]. 经济与社会发展, 2022, 20(5): 12-20.
[3] 何玉长, 王伟. 数据要素市场化的理论阐释[J]. 当代经济研究, 2021(4): 33-44.
[4] 张雅俊. 基于市场机制和交易场景的数据要素定价模型[J]. 社会科学家, 2023(10): 72-76, 84.
[5] 王杰森. 数据作为生产要素参与分配机制研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2022.
[6] 王芳. 关于数据要素市场化配置的十个问题[J]. 图书与情报, 2020(3): 9-13.
[7] 国家数据局. 数字中国发展报告(2023年) [J]. 自动化博览, 2025, 42(1): 3.
[8] 毛太田, 陈忠达, 左珊, 等. 基于PMC指数模型的省级数据要素市场政策量化评价[J/OL]. 情报科学: 1-22.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1264.G2.20250407.1407.006.html, 2025-04-17.
[9] 张雪, 周密, 黄利, 等. 乡村振兴战略实施现状的评价及路径优化——基于辽宁省调研数据[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020(2): 97-106.
[10] 陈丽莉, 张若琪, 戎珂. 数据要素赋能企业创新: 基于内外部资源视角[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(12): 15-25.
[11] Cloke, P. (2006) Conceptualizing Rurality. In: Cloke, P., Marsden, T. and Mooney, P., Eds., The Handbook of Rural Studies, SAGE Publications Ltd., 18-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Woods, J. (2011) Old Country Awakening. New Hibernia Review, 15, 57.
[13] Terluin, I.J. (2003) Differences in Economic Development in Rural Regions of Advanced Countries: An Overview and Critical Analysis of Theories. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 327-344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 韩长赋. 大力实施乡村振兴战略[J]. 中国农业文摘: 农业工程, 2018, 30(1): 3-4.
[15] 叶兴庆. 努力让乡村跟上国家现代化步伐[J]. 农村经营管理, 2019(1): 46.
[16] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.
[17] 张孝德. 大历史观视野下乡村振兴的使命与前途——读懂乡村才能振兴乡村[J]. 长治学院学报, 2021, 38(3): 1-9, 35.
[18] 魏后凯. 新型城镇化与乡村振兴双轮驱动下的县城发展[J]. 中国乡村发现, 2022(3): 20-23.
[19] 王晓毅. 乡村振兴与乡村治理现代化[J]. 山西师大学报(社会科学版), 2022, 49(1): 53-60.
[20] 张挺, 李闽榕, 徐艳梅. 乡村振兴评价指标体系构建与实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(8): 99-105.
[21] 刘守英. 乡村振兴与农业农村优先发展[J]. 金融博览, 2021(7): 8-11.