远程工作下通信企业员工创新激励:基于JD-R模型与工作自主性的跨层研究
Incentive for Employee Innovation in Telecommuting Enterprises: A Cross-Level Study Based on the JD-R Model and Job Autonomy
DOI: 10.12677/mm.2026.162045, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李 曌:江苏中博通信有限公司,江苏 南京
关键词: 远程工作员工创新行为工作自主性上级响应JD-R模型Remote Work Employee Innovative Behavior Work Autonomy Supervisor Responsiveness JD-R Model
摘要: 工业4.0背景下,通信企业普遍采用远程办公,但研发人员创新产出呈现高度离散。本文基于JD-R模型,以276名通信研发工程师及82名直属上级为样本,运用层级回归和Bootstrap法检验远程办公时间占比对员工创新行为的影响机制。结果显示:① 远程办公时间占比显著正向预测创新行为(β = 0.23, p < 0.001);② 工作自主性的方法、安排、标准三维度部分中介该效应,总中介效应占43.5%;③ 上级响应性负向调节远程办公–创新行为关系(交互项β = –0.04,p < 0.05),高响应情境下工作自主性中介作用被削弱。研究将JD-R模型拓展至5G-A/6G远程研发情境,揭示“放权–赋能–留白”机制链,为通信企业HR优化远程岗位设计、在线领导行为和客观创新激励提供了实证依据。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of Industry 4.0, communication enterprises have widely adopted remote work, yet the innovative output of R&D personnel exhibits high dispersion. Based on the JD-R model, this study uses 276 communication R&D engineers and 82 immediate supervisors as samples, employing hierarchical regression and Bootstrap methods to examine the impact mechanism of the proportion of remote work time on employees’ innovative behavior. The results show: ① The proportion of remote work time significantly positively predicts innovative behavior (β = 0.23, p < 0.001); ② The three dimensions of work autonomy—method, arrangement, and standard—partially mediate this effect, with the total mediating effect accounting for 43.5%; ③ Supervisor responsiveness negatively moderates the relationship between remote work and innovative behavior (interaction term β = −0.04, p < 0.05), and the mediating role of work autonomy is weakened in high responsiveness contexts. This study extends the JD-R model to the context of 5G-A/6G remote R&D, revealing a “delegation-empowerment-spacing” mechanism chain, providing empirical evidence for communication enterprises to optimize remote job design, online leadership behavior, and objective innovation incentives in HR practices.
文章引用:李曌. 远程工作下通信企业员工创新激励:基于JD-R模型与工作自主性的跨层研究[J]. 现代管理, 2026, 16(2): 136-144. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2026.162045

参考文献

[1] 中国信通院发布“2025智能体十大关键词” [J]. 网络新媒体技术, 2025, 14(5): 73.
[2] Felstead, A. and Henseke, G. (2017) Assessing the Growth of Remote Working and Its Consequences for Effort, Well-Being and Work-Life Balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32, 195-212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Abgeller, N., Bachmann, R., Dobbins, T. and Anderson, D. (2024) Responsible Autonomy: The Interplay of Autonomy, Control and Trust for Knowledge Professionals Working Remotely during COVID-19. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 45, 57-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Barber, L.K., Kuykendall, L.E. and Santuzzi, A.M. (2023) How Managers Can Reduce “Always on” Work Stress in Teams: An Optimal Work Availability Framework. Organizational Dynamics, 52, Article 100992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Boccoli, G., Sestino, A., Gastaldi, L. and Corso, M. (2022) The Impact of Autonomy and Temporal Flexibility on Individuals’ Psychological Wellbeing in Remote Settings. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 40, 327-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Iannuzzi, F.E. and Campolongo, F. (2023) Transformed or Transferred? How Workers Perceive Managerial Control over Home Telework. Some Insights from an Italian Case. Relations Industrielles, 78, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Nadberezhna, M. (2024) Exploring the Communicative Process of Managing Boundaries Between Remote Work and Life in an Era of “Always on”. San Diego State University.
[8] Delfino, G.F. and van der Kolk, B. (2021) Remote Working, Management Control Changes and Employee Responses during the COVID-19 Crisis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34, 1376-1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Li, R.X., Lim, Y.M., Tan, G.W.H. (2025) Unveiling the Dark Side of Virtual Work Climate: The Mediating Role of Blurred Work-Nonwork Boundaries. Baltic Journal of Management, 20, 72-91.
[10] Bondanini, G., Sanchez-Gomez, M., Mucci, N. and Giorgi, G. (2025) Digital Connectivity at Work: Balancing Benefits and Risks for Engagement, Technostress, and Performance. Administrative Sciences, 15, Article 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef