复杂因果视角下电商企业财务风险生成机理研究
A Study on the Mechanism of Financial Risk Generation in E-Commerce Enterprises from a Complex Causality Perspective
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.152181, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郭胜男, 田芳堃:南京邮电大学管理学院,江苏 南京;洪小娟:南京邮电大学管理学院,江苏 南京;江苏开放大学创新生态研究院,江苏 南京
关键词: 电商企业财务风险fsQCA组态效应因果非对称性E-Commerce Enterprises Financial Risk fsQCA Configurational Effect Causal Asymmetry
摘要: 针对电商行业“高增长却资金链断裂”、“亏损却安全”的生存分化现象,传统基于线性逻辑的财务分析往往面临解释困境。本文基于复杂系统观与资源基础理论,以40家中国A股上市电商企业为研究样本,运用模糊集定性比较分析方法,从组态视角探究了盈利、偿债、营运、成长及成本管控等多重财务要素对电商企业财务风险的复杂影响机制。研究发现,没有任何单一财务指标构成电商企业财务安全或财务危机的必要条件,财务结果是多重因素并发作用的产物。基于此,识别出导致高财务风险的两种路径与实现低财务风险的三种等效路径。验证了电商财务风险生成的因果非对称性,为企业根据自身禀赋选择差异化的风险防御策略提供了理论依据。
Abstract: The phenomenon of survival divergence in the e-commerce industry where companies experience “high growth yet cash flow disruption” or “losses yet financial stability” often poses interpretive challenges for traditional linear-logic-based financial analysis. This paper adopts a complex systems perspective and resource-based theory framework. Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis on a sample of 40 Chinese A-share listed e-commerce firms, it examines the complex interplay of multiple financial factors—including profitability, debt servicing, operations, growth, and cost control—on financial risk from a configuration viewpoint. The findings reveal that no single financial indicator constitutes a necessary condition for either financial security or crisis in e-commerce firms; financial outcomes result from the concurrent effects of multiple factors. Based on this, the study identifies two pathways leading to high financial risk and three equivalent pathways achieving low financial risk. It validates the causal asymmetry in the generation of e-commerce financial risk, providing a theoretical basis for firms to select differentiated risk defense strategies according to their unique endowments.
文章引用:郭胜男, 洪小娟, 田芳堃. 复杂因果视角下电商企业财务风险生成机理研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(2): 469-476. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.152181

参考文献

[1] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 155-167.
[2] 贾小玫, 段雯瑾, 夏冷. 权衡理论和优序融资理论模型与实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2017(11): 173-176.
[3] 刘晓敏. 大数据背景下电商企业财务风险预警分析[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2021, 42(7): 74-75.
[4] Altman, E.I. (1968) Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23, 589-609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
[6] Ragin, C.C. (2009). Redesigning Social Inquiry. University of Chicago Press.[CrossRef
[7] Greckhamer, T. and Gur, F.A. (2021) Disentangling Combinations and Contingencies of Generic Strategies: A Set-Theoretic Configurational Approach. Long Range Planning, 54, Article 101951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 程建青, 罗瑾琏, 杜运周, 等. 何种创业生态系统产生女性高创业活跃度? [J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(4): 695-702.
[9] Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 吴敬静, 贺正楚, 熊勇清. 新能源汽车企业商业模式创新的驱动因素研究——基于NCA与fsQCA的定性比较分析[J]. 科学决策, 2025(11): 134-161.
[11] 程恋军, 王琳茜. 定性比较分析(QCA)中的稳健性研究: 分析策略与未来方向[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2025, 42(1): 19-40.