土壤重金属污染修复技术的分类研究与实际应用
Research on the Classification and Practical Application of Soil Heavy Metal Remediation Technologies
摘要: 土壤重金属污染修复技术的分类研究与实际应用对于应对日益严峻的土壤污染问题至关重要。随着全球工业化进程的加速,冶金、焦化、有色金属采矿、电镀等重工业生产活动已成为土壤有毒重金属污染的核心诱因。这些活动产生的含重金属废水、废渣与废气通过淋溶、沉降等途径侵入土壤系统,不仅破坏土壤结构,还通过食物链累积,威胁生态系统和人类健康,引发了全球性的生态危机。在此背景下,土壤重金属污染修复技术的分类研究显得尤为迫切。修复技术主要分为物理修复、化学修复和生物修复等类别,每种技术都有其适用条件和局限性。单一修复技术难以平衡农田“修复效率–土壤肥力–粮食安全”的多重需求,联合修复技术通过多技术协同实现优势互补,成为农田污染治理的核心方向。本文聚焦农田重金属污染的联合修复技术,系统梳理物理–化学、化学–生物、生物–生物联合修复的技术路径、实际应用案例、工程化瓶颈及成本效益,通过量化对比与机理分析,为农田土壤安全利用提供理论与技术支撑。
Abstract: The classification research and practical application of soil heavy metal contamination remediation technologies are crucial for addressing the increasingly severe problem of soil pollution. With the acceleration of global industrialization, heavy industrial production activities such as metallurgy, coking, non-ferrous metal mining, and electroplating have become the core causes of toxic heavy metal contamination in soil. The heavy metal-containing wastewater, slag, and exhaust gases generated by these activities infiltrate the soil system through leaching, sedimentation, and other pathways. This not only damages soil structure but also leads to accumulation through the food chain, threatening ecosystem and human health, thereby triggering a global ecological crisis. In this context, classification research on soil heavy metal remediation technologies is particularly urgent. Remediation technologies are mainly categorized into physical, chemical, and biological remediation, each with its applicable conditions and limitations. A single remediation technology is difficult to balance the multiple demands of “remediation efficiency - soil fertility - food security” in farmland. Combined remediation technologies achieve complementarity of advantages through the synergy of multiple technologies and have become the core direction of farmland pollution control. This study focuses on the combined remediation technologies for heavy metal pollution in farmland, systematically sorts out the technical pathways, practical application cases, engineering bottlenecks, and cost-effectiveness of physical-chemical, chemical-biological, and biological-biological combined remediation. Through quantitative comparison and mechanism analysis, it provides theoretical and technical support for the safe utilization of farmland soil.
文章引用:黎娜. 土壤重金属污染修复技术的分类研究与实际应用[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(2): 159-167. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.162016

参考文献

[1] Huang, Y., Chen, Q., Deng, M., Japenga, J., Li, T., Yang, X., et al. (2018) Heavy Metal Pollution and Health Risk Assessment of Agricultural Soils in a Typical Peri-Urban Area in Southeast China. Journal of Environmental Management, 207, 159-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 沈慧. 湖南土壤重金属污染防治的探索之路[J]. 有色冶金节能, 2016, 32(5): 59-60.
[3] 李如忠, 徐晶晶, 姜艳敏, 等. 铜陵市惠溪河滨岸带土壤重金属形态分布及风险评估[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(1): 88-96.
[4] 李秋莹, 于婵, 周艳, 等. 铬胁迫对丹参种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 种子, 2024, 43(1): 124-129.
[5] 苗亚琼, 林清广, 广西师范学院北部湾环境演变与资源利用教育部重点实验室. 广西土壤重金属镉污染及对人体健康的危害[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2016, 41(5): 171-173.
[6] 孙海龙, 杨庆, 宋媛媛. 矿区场地土壤重金属吸附反应固载与磁分离移除技术研究[EB/OL].
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=hmNf6PfbaBsf2jld8YNkSGRYR-oowciEiTyqIxGpNw8wUJwueAP5vYHiVD4bBL8DN_gGFHmQtRYV4G7DnPw-dVFaspGXX4ZwuBj2an-9r9xz-5ZWdXnq-ha3jbFhPEAJqoIs_wMsx5zsBvms3b4QyCRj4kgTwLOvyV8GNRy5C1AKty8lGORfPQ==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS, 2026-02-05.
[7] 雷婷武. 污染土壤修复技术及发展趋势探索[J]. 清洗世界, 2023, 39(1): 167-169.
[8] 王坚, 张磊, 崔勇, 等. 基于工程案例的污染地块土壤异位热脱附污染排放分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2025, 19(8): 2016-2025.
[9] 黄金鹏, 韦行, 孙梦强, 等. 重金属污染土壤电动修复技术研究进展及展望[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(6): 1173-1183.
[10] 陈文轩, 李茜, 王珍, 孙兆军. 中国农田土壤重金属空间分布特征及污染评价[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(6): 2822-2833.
[11] 丁跃. 重金属复合污染土壤的强化电动修复及机理研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2024.
[12] Wyszkowski, M. and Kordala, N. (2023) Importance of Compost, Bentonite, and Calcium Oxide in Reducing Trace Element Content in Maize on Agricultural Soil Contaminated with Diesel Oil. Agriculture, 13, Article No. 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 刘领, 悦飞雪, 李继伟, 等. 镉胁迫下生物炭与锌/钾叶面肥促进烟草生长降低镉富集的协同效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(6): 982-990.
[14] 贺运鸣 山. FeCl3与EDTA复合淋洗剂修复铅污染土壤的协同效应研究[J]. 山西化工, 2025, 45(8): 240-242.
[15] 谷雨, 蒋平, 李明德, 等. 商陆修复土壤重金属污染研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2018(1): 119-122.
[16] 魏名扬. 重金属耐受菌联合印度芥菜对土壤镉-锌复合污染的修复研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 四川大学, 2023.
[17] 冯子龙. 玉米与香根草、伴矿景天间作对重金属Cd、Pb污染土壤的修复研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 温州: 温州大学, 2017.
[18] 龚文, 徐素云, 魏然, 等. 黑麦草与生物炭联合修复芘污染土壤的交互作用机制: 根际降解与吸附竞争[J]. 环境科学学报, 2025, 45(11): 379-388.
[19] 岳飞雪. 生物炭负载枯草芽孢杆菌Bacillus subtilis对Cd、Cu污染土壤的修复研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2025.
[20] 吴雨菲, 孙军柯, 庞安冉, 等. 硫酸盐还原菌脱硫弧菌S5还原硫酸盐和重金属Cr(VI)的性质分析[J]. 微生物学报, 2025, 65(11): 5022-5036.
[21] 陈永贵, 江昭明, 付俊, 等. 巴氏芽孢杆菌固化污染土的培养优化与矿化机制[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(4): 635-643.
[22] 王靖. 巴氏芽孢杆菌对黄河滩区镉污染土壤修复及冬小麦镉富集影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 开封: 河南大学, 2024.
[23] 李轶荣. 生物炭和有机肥不同配比对稻麦轮作系统下根际土壤及环境的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2024.
[24] 叶顺云. 木薯秸秆生物质炭负载层状双金属氢氧化物复合材料的制备及对Pb(II)、Cd(II)和Cu(II)的吸附性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2024.
[25] Wang, J., Zhao, Q., Zhong, Y., Ji, S., Chen, G., He, Q., et al. (2023) Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Barren Soils of a High-Vanadium Region: Roles of Carbon and Vanadium. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 186, Article ID: 109163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Li, W., Li, W., Xing, L. and Guo, S. (2022) Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on Microorganism of Phenanthrene and Pyrene Contaminated Soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 25, 240-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Baghaie, A.H. and Aghilizefreei, A. (2019) Neighbor Presence of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Can Increase Sorghum Phytoremediation Efficiency in a Soil Treated with Pb Polluted Cow Manure. Journal of Human, Environment, and Health Promotion, 5, 153-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 陈微微, 闫兵刚, 罗玉虎, 等. 陕西省超富集植物种类组成与空间分布特征研究[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2025, 44(11): 96-103.