岩石与混凝土蠕变行为研究进展:实验方法、数值模拟与工程适用性综述
Research Progress on Creep Behavior of Rocks and Concrete: Experimental Methods, Numerical Simulation, and Engineering Applicability
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2026.152032, PDF,   
作者: 谭正林, 李庆文:辽宁工业大学土木建筑工程学院,辽宁 锦州
关键词: 蠕变本构模型数值模拟Creep Constitutive Model Numerical Simulation
摘要: 岩石与混凝土蠕变作为典型的时间依赖性力学行为,对深部地下工程和土木结构的长期变形与安全具有重要影响。随着工程规模扩大和环境复杂化,传统基于短期强度的分析方法已难以满足长期安全评估需求,蠕变效应逐渐成为工程稳定性分析中的关键问题。本文系统综述了岩石与混凝土蠕变研究的主要进展,重点从实验研究、数值模拟方法、蠕变本构模型及其工程适用性等方面进行评述。总结了单轴、三轴及多因素耦合蠕变试验在蠕变阶段划分、长期强度判定和损伤演化机制揭示方面的研究成果;对有限元法、有限差分法和离散元法等数值模拟方法及典型蠕变模型进行了对比分析,评估其在长期变形预测中的适用条件与局限性;进一步探讨了基于损伤力学、微观机制及机器学习方法在复杂工况下蠕变预测中的应用潜力。研究表明,蠕变分析正由经验模型向多尺度、多场耦合和数据驱动方向发展,但模型的可解释性与工程适用性仍需进一步提升。本文可为岩体与结构工程的长期稳定性分析及蠕变模型选取提供参考。
Abstract: This Rock and concrete creep, as typical time-dependent mechanical behaviors, play a critical role in the long-term deformation control and safety of deep underground engineering and civil structures. With the increasing scale of engineering projects and the growing complexity of service environments, conventional analysis methods based primarily on short-term strength are no longer sufficient for long-term safety assessment, and creep effects have become a key issue in engineering stability analysis. This paper systematically reviews the major research advances in rock and concrete creep, with a focus on experimental investigations, numerical simulation approaches, creep constitutive models, and their engineering applicability. The achievements of uniaxial, triaxial, and multi-factor coupled creep tests in identifying creep stages, determining long-term strength, and elucidating damage evolution mechanisms are summarized. Typical numerical methods, including the finite element method, finite difference method, and discrete element method, as well as representative creep models, are comparatively analyzed, and their applicability and limitations in long-term deformation prediction are evaluated. Furthermore, the potential of creep prediction under complex conditions based on damage mechanics, micromechanical mechanisms, and machine-learning approaches is discussed. The review indicates that creep analysis is evolving from empirical modeling toward multi-scale, multi-field coupling and data-driven frameworks; however, the interpretability and engineering applicability of existing models still require further improvement. This work provides a useful reference for long-term stability analysis of rock masses and structures, as well as for the selection of appropriate creep models in engineering practice.
文章引用:谭正林, 李庆文. 岩石与混凝土蠕变行为研究进展:实验方法、数值模拟与工程适用性综述[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(2): 127-135. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.152032

参考文献

[1] 张向东, 李永靖, 张树光, 等. 软岩蠕变理论及其工程应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004(10): 1635-1639.
[2] 王来贵, 何峰, 刘向峰, 等. 岩石试件非线性蠕变模型及其稳定性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004(10): 1640-1642.
[3] 杨峰. 高应力软岩巷道变形破坏特征及让压支护机理研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2009.
[4] 冒海军, 杨春和, 刘江, 等. 板岩蠕变特性试验研究与模拟分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006(6): 1204-1209.
[5] 徐涛, 林皋, 唐春安, 等. 拉伸载荷作用下混凝土蠕变-损伤破坏过程数值模拟[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007(1): 28-33.
[6] Gao, P., Ye, G., Huang, H., Qian, Z., Schlangen, E., Wei, J., et al. (2022) Incorporating Elastic and Creep Deformations in Modelling the Three-Dimensional Autogenous Shrinkage of Cement Paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 160, Article ID: 106907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 郭少华. 混凝土蠕变损伤分析模型[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报, 1995(3): 299-303.
[8] 孙钧. 岩石流变力学及其工程应用研究的若干进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007(6): 1081-1106.
[9] 赵宝云, 刘东燕, 郑颖人, 等. 红砂岩单轴压缩蠕变试验及模型研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(5): 744-747.
[10] 陈卫忠, 谭贤君, 吕森鹏, 等. 深部软岩大型三轴压缩流变试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(9): 1735-1744.
[11] 赵阿兴, 施良骐, 崇秀兰. 一种岩石单轴高温抗压强度、变形性质和蠕变实验方法介绍[J]. 力学与实践, 1987(S1): 142-146.
[12] 贺其. 红砂岩单轴加卸载蠕变特性试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 抚州: 东华理工大学, 2016.
[13] 任建喜. 单轴压缩岩石蠕变损伤扩展细观机理CT实时试验[J]. 水利学报, 2002(1): 10-15.
[14] Li, Q., Li, W., Pan, C., Xu, M., Gu, S., Zhang, S., et al. (2025) Influence of CFRP Jackets Stiffness on the Performance of Coal Cylinders: 3D PFC-FLAC Coupled Numerical Investigation. Construction and Building Materials, 481, Article ID: 141538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 曹日跃. 深部软弱煤岩围岩变形及松动圈随时间演化规律研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽建筑大学, 2017.
[16] 徐盼. 深部软弱煤岩巷道松动变形随时间演化规律分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽建筑大学, 2016.
[17] 储昭飞. 流变软岩中隧道支护-围岩相互作用关系研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018.
[18] 徐素国. 层状盐岩矿床油气储库建造及稳定性基础研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2010.
[19] 陈生水, 郑澄锋, 王国利. 膨胀土边坡长期强度变形特性和稳定性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007(6): 795-799.
[20] 杨松林, 张建民, 黄启平. 节理岩体蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2004(8): 1225-1228.
[21] Díaz Flores, R., Hellmich, C. and Pichler, B. (2025) Nonlinear Creep of Concrete: Stress-Activated Stick-Slip Transition of Viscous Interfaces and Microcracking-Induced Damage. Cement and Concrete Research, 191, Article ID: 107809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 唐春安, 马天辉, 李连崇, 等. 高放废料地质处置中多场耦合作用下的岩石破裂问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007(S2): 3932-3938.
[23] 李树清. 深部煤巷围岩控制内、外承载结构耦合稳定原理的研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2008.
[24] 闫子舰, 夏才初, 李宏哲, 等. 分级卸荷条件下锦屏大理岩流变规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008(10): 2153-2159.
[25] 杨秀荣, 姜谙男, 江宗斌. 含水状态下软岩蠕变试验及损伤模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S1): 167-174.
[26] 陈亮, 刘建锋, 王春萍, 等. 不同温度及应力状态下北山花岗岩蠕变特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(6): 1228-1235.
[27] 冯德成, 吴刚. 混凝土结构基本性能的可解释机器学习建模方法[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2022, 43(4): 228-238.
[28] 王丽苹, 高瑞贞, 张京军, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的混凝土路面裂缝检测[J]. 计算机科学, 2019, 46(S2): 584-589.
[29] 张书颖, 陈适之, 韩万水, 等. 基于集成学习的FRP加固混凝土梁抗弯承载力预测研究[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(8): 245-256.
[30] Albert, C., Isgor, O.B. and Angst, U. (2022) Exploring Machine Learning to Predict the Pore Solution Composition of Hardened Cementitious Systems. Cement and Concrete Research, 162, Article ID: 107001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Liang, M., Chang, Z., Wan, Z., Gan, Y., Schlangen, E. and Šavija, B. (2022) Interpretable Ensemble-Machine-Learning Models for Predicting Creep Behavior of Concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 125, Article ID: 104295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef