东北三省战略性新兴产业企业“进入–退出”时空演化特征与生态环境的研究
Research on Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Ecological Environment of “Entry-Exit” in Strategic Emerging Industries Enterprises in Northeast China’s Three Provinces
DOI: 10.12677/sd.2026.162064, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘 橦, 张 鹏:哈尔滨师范大学地理科学学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨;张傲然*:黑龙江省对外科技合作中心科普外联部,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 战略性新兴产业进入与退出时空演化生态环境东北三省Strategic Emerging Industries Entry and Exit Spatiotemporal Evolution Ecological Environment Three Northeastern Provinces
摘要: 战略性新兴产业(SEIs)作为推动区域经济转型与生态协调的重要载体,其企业“进入–退出”行为不仅重塑产业空间格局,也深刻影响区域生态环境质量。本文基于2009、2013、2019、2023四个年份的东北三省SEIs企业微观数据,运用ArcGIS空间分析方法刻画企业进入与退出的时空演化特征,并在此基础上探讨其生态环境效应。研究发现:(1) 企业进入与退出均呈现“核心引领、梯度扩散”的空间演化规律,哈尔滨、长春、沈阳三大核心城市始终是产业集聚与更替的核心,大连、吉林、大庆等次级城市及边缘城市逐步成为扩散节点,退出格局在后期呈现更广泛的区域蔓延特征。(2) 企业进入对生态环境的影响存在显著区域差异,核心城市因产业技术结构与环境治理能力较强,表现出积极效应;部分次级城市与资源型城市则因企业高耗能环节与治理能力不足,面临一定环境压力。(3) 企业退出虽短期释放生态空间,但历史污染治理与生态修复仍是东北老工业基地面临的长期挑战。本研究为东北三省优化产业布局、推动产业转型与生态保护协同发展提供科学依据,也对同类老工业基地的可持续发展具有参考价值。
Abstract: As key drivers of regional economic transformation and ecological coordination, strategic emerging industries (SEIs) reshape industrial spatial patterns through corporate entry and exit behaviors, profoundly impacting regional ecological and environmental quality. This study employs ArcGIS spatial analysis methods to characterize the spatiotemporal evolution of enterprise entry and exit based on micro-level data from SEI enterprises in the three northeastern provinces of China across four years (2009, 2013, 2019, 2023), thereby examining their ecological and environmental impacts. The study reveals: (1) Both entry and exit follow a “core-led, gradient diffusion” spatial evolution pattern. The three core cities—Harbin, Changchun, and Shenyang—consistently serve as hubs for industrial agglomeration and renewal, while secondary cities like Dalian, Jilin, and Daqing, along with peripheral cities, gradually emerge as diffusion nodes. Exit patterns exhibit broader regional spread in later stages. (2) The ecological impact of enterprise entry exhibits significant regional variation. Core cities demonstrate positive effects due to their advanced industrial technology structures and robust environmental governance capabilities. Conversely, some secondary and resource-based cities face environmental pressures stemming from high-energy-consuming industrial processes and inadequate governance capacities. (3) While corporate exits temporarily release ecological space, historical pollution remediation and ecological restoration remain long-term challenges for Northeast China’s old industrial bases. This study provides scientific basis for optimizing industrial layout, promoting industrial transformation, and advancing coordinated ecological conservation in the three northeastern provinces, while also offering reference value for sustainable development in similar old industrial bases.
文章引用:刘橦, 张鹏, 张傲然. 东北三省战略性新兴产业企业“进入–退出”时空演化特征与生态环境的研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(2): 118-124. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.162064

参考文献

[1] 汤长安, 张丽家, 殷强. 中国战略性新兴产业空间格局演变与优化[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(5): 101-107.
[2] 李蕴雄, 任永欢, 贺灿飞. 中国的地区企业进入与退出关联研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(3): 349-357.
[3] Zhang, Q., Tang, X., Xiao, Y., Xiang, X. and Huang, H. (2023) Coordination of Industrial Structure and Eco-Efficiency in Ecologically Fragile Areas: A Case Study of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 331, Article ID: 117237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 杨洋. 鄱阳湖生态经济区战略性新兴产业协调发展评价与对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2015.
[5] 李霞, 文琦, 杨瑞兰. 能源开发区产业结构演变的环境效应分析——以榆林市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(8): 127-133+141.
[6] 杨建林, 徐君. 经济区产业结构变动对生态环境的动态效应分析——以呼包银榆经济区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(10): 179-186.
[7] 张海峰, 白永平, 王保宏, 等. 青海省产业结构变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 经济地理, 2008(5): 748-751.
[8] 彭建, 王仰麟, 叶敏婷, 等. 区域产业结构变化及其生态环境效应——以云南省丽江市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2005(5): 798-806.
[9] 何丽娜. 黄河流域山东段经济增长、产业发展和生态环境耦合协同关系[J]. 科技和产业, 2024, 24(15): 37-41.
[10] 杨丽花. 松花江流域(吉林省段)经济环境效应与产业空间组织研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院(东北地理与农业生态研究所), 2013.
[11] 仇方道, 顾云海. 区域经济与环境协调发展机制——以徐州市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2006(6): 1022-1025+1050.
[12] 蔺雪芹, 方创琳. 城市群工业发展的生态环境效应——以武汉城市群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(12): 2233-2242.
[13] 达成, 张富涛, 钱勇生, 等. 关中平原城市群“交通-产业-环境”耦合协调发展的动态演化特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(3): 955-965.
[14] 曹胜平, 欧芳, 林秋莲, 等. 广西生态环境与大健康产业发展促进生态优势转化发展优势分析与建议[J]. 黑龙江环境通报, 2024, 37(12): 38-40.
[15] 赵静, 郭佩云, 汪辉. 黄河流域文化产业-旅游产业-生态环境耦合协调研究[J]. 人文地理, 2024, 39(5): 184-192.
[16] 张慧谦. 青海省旅游产业与生态环境的耦合协调发展研究[J]. 中国集体经济, 2024(30): 29-32.
[17] 周成, 冯学钢, 唐睿. 区域经济-生态环境-旅游产业耦合协调发展分析与预测——以长江经济带沿线各省市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(3): 186-193.
[18] 方叶林, 黄震方, 段忠贤, 等. 中国旅游业发展与生态环境耦合协调研究[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(12): 195-201.
[19] 袁毓, 杨旭. 中国工业结构升级与生态环境时空协同演化特征及影响因素[J/OL]. 环境科学, 1-20. https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.13227/j.hjkx.202503083, 2025-06-17.[CrossRef
[20] Gibbs, D. and Deutz, P. (2005) Implementing Industrial Ecology? Planning for Eco-Industrial Parks in the Usa. Geoforum, 36, 452-464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Revell, A. (2007) The Ecological Modernisation of SMEs in the UK’s Construction Industry. Geoforum, 38, 114-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Korhonen, J. and Snäkin, J. (2005) Analysing the Evolution of Industrial Ecosystems: Concepts and Application. Ecological Economics, 52, 169-186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Deutz, P. and Gibbs, D. (2008) Industrial Ecology and Regional Development: Eco-Industrial Development as Cluster Policy. Regional Studies, 42, 1313-1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Dong, L., Fujita, T., Dai, M., Geng, Y., Ren, J., Fujii, M., et al. (2016) Towards Preventative Eco-Industrial Development: An Industrial and Urban Symbiosis Case in One Typical Industrial City in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 387-400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 毛其淋, 盛斌. 中国制造业企业的进入退出与生产率动态演化[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(4): 16-29.