水利工程勘察危险源识别及辨识研究
Research on Hazard Identification and Recognition in Water Conservancy Engineering Investigation
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2026.152039, PDF,   
作者: 杨 萌, 许尚杰*:山东省水利科学研究院,山东 济南;山东省水网调度与水资源高效利用重点实验室,山东 济南;代英富:山东省水利工程建设质量与安全中心,山东 济南
关键词: 工程勘察危险源识别风险辨识六项机制BIM技术智能预警Engineering Investigation Hazard Identification Risk Recognition Six Mechanisms BIM Technology Intelligent Early Warning
摘要: 工程勘察作为水利工程建设的前置环节,其作业环境复杂、风险类型多样,危险源识别与辨识是安全生产管理的核心基础。本文系统分析工程勘察过程中面临的六类主要危险源,深入剖析当前危险源识别中存在的问题,基于水利行业推行的“六项机制”与“六项体系”管理思想,结合BIM技术、人工智能、物联网等新兴技术,构建覆盖“风险识别–评估–监测–预警–控制–应急–责任–培训”全链条的危险源管控体系,提出基于过程方法的危险源辨识框架,建立定性与定量相结合的风险评估模型,设计智能化的风险监测预警系统。研究结果表明,该体系能够显著提升危险源识别的全面性、准确性和时效性,为工程勘察单位的安全生产管理提供科学的理论支撑和实用的技术路径。
Abstract: As a preliminary phase of infrastructure construction, engineering investigation involves complex working environments and diverse risk types, making hazard identification and recognition a fundamental aspect of safety management in production. This paper systematically analyzes six major categories of hazards encountered during engineering investigation and conducts an in-depth examination of existing issues in current hazard identification practices. Building on the management philosophy of the “Six Mechanisms” and “Six Systems” promoted in the water conservancy sector, and integrating emerging technologies such as BIM, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things, this study constructs a comprehensive hazard management and control system covering the entire chain of “risk identification - assessment - monitoring - early warning - control - emergency response - accountability - training.” A process-based framework for hazard recognition is proposed, alongside a risk assessment model that combines qualitative and quantitative approaches, and an intelligent risk monitoring and early warning system is designed. The research results demonstrate that this system significantly enhances the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and timeliness of hazard identification, providing scientific theoretical support and practical technical pathways for safety management in engineering investigation organizations.
文章引用:杨萌, 代英富, 许尚杰. 水利工程勘察危险源识别及辨识研究[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(2): 192-198. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.152039

参考文献

[1] 全国工程勘察质量与安全问题剖析技术交流会在重庆召开[EB/OL].
https://www.chinaeda.org.cn/contents/89/14484.html, 2025-11-25.
[2] 水利部. 关于构建水利安全生产风险管控“六项机制”的实施意见[Z]. 2022.
[3] GB50585-2010. 岩土工程勘察安全规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2010.
[4] 陈建国, 张永兴. 地质灾害风险评估理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
[5] 王川. 软土地区地下车站勘察质量风险评估[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2021.
[6] 刘志刚, 王晓磊. 工程勘察作业危险源辨识与防控技术研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(4): 1452-1459.
[7] 戴耀斌. 基于ISO 45001标准要求的危险源辨识过程探讨[J]. 中国认证认可, 2019(7): 45-48.
[8] 山东省质量技术监督局. DB37/T 2882-2016. 安全生产风险分级管控体系通则[S]. 济南: 山东人民出版社, 2016.
[9] 王磊, 李静. 基于BIM与IoT的施工安全风险智能预警系统[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2022, 39(2): 112-119.
[10] 陈元桥, 陈全, 王顺祺, 等. (2018) ISO 45001: 2018. Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems—Requirements with Guidance for Use.
[11] 黄宏伟, 张顶立. 工程风险管理的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.