“问题导向”的《外国文学》教学改革与实践
Problem-Based Teaching Reform and Practice in Foreign Literature
摘要: “问题导向”的《外国文学》教学实践以文学史脉络为主线,围绕关键文本、代表性作家与重要文学思潮,构建了递进式的问题模块,涵盖现实主义、现代主义、存在主义等重要主题。问题设置遵循由浅入深的路径,使学生在连续的问题链中建立整体性的文学认识。课堂组织采用小组合作探究、主题汇报与教师反馈的组合模式,强化学生的参与度与课堂的生成性。研究表明学生的研究能力、文献检索与整合能力得到显著提升,跨文本分析的深度与逻辑性增强;讨论氛围更为活跃,学生在表达观点、回应同伴及观点论证方面表现得更自信;合作学习也促进了其团队意识与沟通能力的提升。总体来看,课堂已逐步由知识传递转向知识生产,“以学生为中心”的理念得到阶段性落实。然而,如何进一步提升理论分析深度,如何强化学术规范训练,以及如何让过程性评价更系统、更可积累,仍是下一阶段需要持续探索的方向。
Abstract: The teaching reform of Foreign Literature with problem-based learning as the core path takes literary history as the main thread, and constructs a progressive problem module around key texts, representative writers, and important literary trends, covering important themes such as realism, modernism, and existentialism. The problem setting follows a path from shallow to deep, enabling students to establish a holistic literary understanding in a continuous chain of questions. The classroom organization adopts a combination model of group cooperative exploration, thematic reporting, and teacher feedback to enhance student participation and classroom generation. Research has shown that students’ research ability, literature retrieval and integration ability have been significantly improved, and the depth and logicality of cross text analysis have been enhanced; The discussion atmosphere is more active, and students show more confidence in expressing their opinions, responding to peers, and supporting their arguments; Collaborative learning also promotes the improvement of team awareness and communication skills. Overall, the classroom has gradually shifted from knowledge transmission to knowledge production, and the concept of Student-centeredness has been implemented in stages. However, how to further enhance the depth of theoretical analysis, strengthen academic norms training, and make process evaluation more systematic and accumulative are still the directions that need to be continuously explored in the next stage.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
卡尔∙罗杰斯, 杰罗姆∙弗赖伯格. 自由学习[M]. 王烨晖, 译. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2015.
|
|
[2]
|
刘振天, 吴秋怡. “‘以’学生为中心”抑或“学生为中心”: 一个本体论的新认知[J]. 教育发展研究, 2023(9): 1-9.
|
|
[3]
|
尤尔根∙哈贝马斯. 现代性的哲学话语[M]. 曹卫东, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2004: 352.
|
|
[4]
|
皮亚杰. 皮亚杰教育论著选[M]. 卢濬, 译. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2016: 27.
|
|
[5]
|
《外国文学史》编写组, 编. 外国文学史∙下册[M]. 第2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018.
|
|
[6]
|
董旭, 苏晖. “教” “研”相长的多维之路: 从文学伦理学批评到外国文学教学与研究——苏晖教授访谈录[J]. 广东外语外贸大学学报, 2023(1): 31-32.
|
|
[7]
|
张叉, 蒋承勇. 外国文学教材编写与教学信息化建设——蒋承勇教授访谈录[J]. 外国语文研究, 2018(5): 1-7.
|
|
[8]
|
文艳平, 秦国杰. PBL的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2007: 46.
|
|
[9]
|
王显芳, 郭智芳, 姚兰芳. 高校“形势与政策”课应用PBL教学法的实践与探索[J]. 思想教育研究, 2016(2): 75.
|
|
[10]
|
郝平. PBL模式在历史教学中对研究生“问题意识”的培养[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2019(1): 63.
|
|
[11]
|
张海燕. 高校外国文学“金课”的新文科创新探索[J]. 中国多媒体与网络教学学报(上旬刊), 2023(2): 52-53.
|
|
[12]
|
孙婷婷. 运用PBL教学法进行外国文学文本细读的实践探索——以《包法利夫人》为例[J]. 宁波教育学院学报, 2018, 20(4): 1-4.
|