轻罪刑事赔偿保证金制度的构建与法理研究
Construction and Jurisprudential Study of the Criminal Compensation Guarantee System for Misdemeanors
摘要: 刑事赔偿保证金作为轻罪治理体系中的一项特殊制度,其制度建构对于提升轻罪治理效能、拓展我国协商型纠纷解决机制的实践空间以及保障当事双方合法权益具有重要价值。现行立法对刑事赔偿保证金制度的规范仍显笼统,在出罪依据、适用标准以及制度衔接程序和救济机制等方面均存在不足,进而制约了该制度的实际可操作性。基于此,有必要通过制定专门的规范性文件,对刑事赔偿保证金制度进行系统完善,明确其出罪依据与适用标准,健全被害人参与机制与救济路径,并通过完善相关司法解释强化制度之间的衔接,推动赔偿保证金制度在实践中的融合运作与公正运行,从而为轻罪治理体系的完善提供相应的理论支撑与实践指引。
Abstract: As a distinctive mechanism within the misdemeanor governance framework, the establishment of the criminal compensation guarantee system holds significant value for enhancing the effectiveness of misdemeanor governance, expanding the scope of consensual justice in China, and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of both parties involved. Current legislative provisions regarding the criminal compensation guarantee system remain general, exhibiting deficiencies in areas such as the basis for exemption from criminal liability, applicable standards, procedural interfaces with other systems, and relief mechanisms. These shortcomings constrain the system’s practical operability. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically refine the criminal compensation guarantee system through the formulation of specialized normative documents. This involves clarifying its basis for exemption and applicable criteria, improving victim participation mechanisms and relief pathways, and enhancing coordination with related systems by refining relevant judicial interpretations. Such efforts will promote the integrated and fair operation of the compensation guarantee system in practice, thereby providing theoretical support and practical guidance for the advancement of the misdemeanor governance system.
文章引用:李萌. 轻罪刑事赔偿保证金制度的构建与法理研究[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(2): 113-118. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.142052

参考文献

[1] 卢建平. 轻罪时代的犯罪治理方略[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(1): 51-66.
[2] 陈文琦. 轻罪治理的司法实践与困境纾解[J]. 法制博览, 2025(25): 49-51.
[3] 何静, 李天杰. 轻罪刑事赔偿保证金制度研究[J]. 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(5): 58-66.
[4] 卢建平. 轻罪治理的形势与挑战[J]. 警学研究, 2024(1): 12-15.
[5] 王志远, 罗米兰. 从“排斥”到“包容”: 我国轻罪治理的反思与完善[J]. 中国刑警学院学报, 2025(3): 78-92.
[6] 付涵. 性侵幼女案中被害人谅解情节的量刑考量[J]. 人民司法, 2020(17): 13-15.
[7] 王志远. 刑事赔偿谅解从宽的正当性与适用界限[J]. 人民检察, 2023(18): 11-15.
[8] 徐岱, 郑成杰. 从轻罪惩治到轻犯罪治理的中国路径选择[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2025, 65(4): 31-49+282-283.
[9] 耿慧茹. 刑事和解制度对诉讼主体利益的价值分析[N]. 人民法院报, 2012-11-07(6).
[10] 向燕, 杨雪艳, 李光林. 国家介入的修复: 刑事赔偿保证金制度的运行逻辑[J]. 青少年犯罪问题, 2022(5): 98-110.
[11] 陈立毅, 李胤霖. 检察机关参与轻罪治理的实践定位与机制构建[J]. 天津法学, 2025, 41(3): 94-101.
[12] 牛忠志, 于鸿峣. 当代中国轻罪制裁体系的系统反思与优化[J]. 河北学刊, 2023, 43(3): 196-202.
[13] 李翔, 周家琳. 从轻罪“治罪”到轻罪“治理”: 定罪免刑的体系化建构[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026(1): 191-202.
[14] 王桂芳. 公诉案件当事人和解制度的实践检视与路径完善: 基于二审裁判文书的实证研究[J]. 法学家, 2022(4): 128-145.