困难立地造林失败模式识别与适应性重构路径
Identification of Failure Modes and Adaptive Reconstruction Paths for Afforestation on Difficult Sites
DOI: 10.12677/wjf.2026.152035, PDF,   
作者: 李雅妮, 王 斌, 杨 秀:商洛市商州区二龙山国有林场,陕西 商洛;王 唯:商洛市商州区夜村国有林场,陕西 商洛;张丰玺:商洛市镇安县高峰镇人民政府,陕西 镇安
关键词: 困难立地造林失败模式适应性重构生态恢复Difficult Sites Afforestation Failure Modes Adaptive Reconstruction Ecological Restoration
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在分析困难立地造林失败的原因,精准找出典型失败模式,构建适应性重构技术路径,提高困难立地造林工程的成活率、保存率和长期生态稳定性。方法:通过对水分胁迫、土壤贫瘠、树种与立地不匹配、施工管理失误这四个主要的失败原因进行梳理,指出传统补植重来模式存在的治标不治本、资源浪费等问题,结合立地条件分类和生态边界阈值分析,提出相应的适应性重构方案。结果:得出适地适树、先改善立地后营林、微环境调节、全周期可调节四大生态恢复原则。采用土壤改良、树种精准选配、微气候调控等技术措施,使困难立地造林目标从短期成活变为长期存活,极大地改善植被生长状况和生态系统抗逆性,给生态修复提供稳固且可推广的技术途径。结论:本研究形成的适应性重构路径,给困难立地生态修复提供了一个系统的理论框架和操作指南,不仅可以改善造林技术的应用效果,还可以使生态恢复过程更加科学、精细化,可以给相关领域的技术创新提供理论支持,有利于生态环境的改善和可持续发展目标的实现。
Abstract: Objective: This study aims to analyze the reasons for failure in afforestation on difficult sites, accurately identify typical failure patterns, and develop adaptive reconstruction technology paths to improve the survival rate, preservation rate, and long-term ecological stability of difficult site afforestation projects. Methods: By reviewing the four main failure causes—water stress, soil infertility, mismatch between tree species and site conditions, and management errors, the study points out the issues with traditional replanting models, such as being short-term solutions and resource wastage. It combines site condition classification and ecological boundary threshold analysis to propose corresponding adaptive reconstruction schemes. Results: Four ecological restoration principles are established: suitable tree species for the site, improving the site before afforestation, microenvironment regulation, and full-cycle adjustability. Technical measures such as soil improvement, precise species selection, and microclimate control are employed, transforming difficult site afforestation goals from short-term survival to long-term survival. These measures greatly enhance vegetation growth and the ecosystem’s resistance to stress, providing a solid and scalable technical approach for ecological restoration. Conclusion: The adaptive reconstruction path developed in this study offers a systematic theoretical framework and operational guide for ecological restoration on difficult sites. It not only improves the application effects of afforestation technology but also makes the ecological restoration process more scientific and refined. It provides theoretical support for technological innovation in related fields and contributes to ecological environment improvement and the achievement of sustainable development goals.
文章引用:李雅妮, 王唯, 张丰玺, 王斌, 杨秀. 困难立地造林失败模式识别与适应性重构路径[J]. 林业世界, 2026, 15(2): 291-299. https://doi.org/10.12677/wjf.2026.152035

参考文献

[1] 吴胜胜. 探析定边县困难立地造林技术难点及处理对策[J]. 当代农机, 2025(7): 52-54.
[2] 刘浩. 提高半干旱地区困难立地造林绿化策略探究[J]. 中国林副特产, 2021(5): 101-102, 104.
[3] 沙学平. 辽西北半干旱地区困难立地造林关键技术[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2023(4): 70-72.
[4] 张波, 刘宝, 程伟. 困难立地造林存在的问题及其对策[J]. 南方农业, 2022, 16(8): 98-100.
[5] 孙跃志. 造林对辽西北地区困难立地水土保持作用的影响[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2020, 10(1): 61-62, 74.
[6] 黄智群, 赵云, 武建超, 等. 渭北旱腰带困难立地生态修复技术[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2024, 27(2): 172-174.
[7] 赵云, 黄智群, 晁刚. 陕西礼泉县困难立地生态修复技术[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2024, 27(1): 176-177, 181.
[8] 张晓娟, 赵福洲, 娜仁. 鄂尔多斯地区困难立地造林模式研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2022(2): 43-45, 51.
[9] 谢毓芬, 陈鹏, 郭晖, 等. 渭北地区困难立地造林技术[J]. 温带林业研究, 2025, 8(2): 59-62.
[10] 闫星达. 困难立地造林和森林植被恢复技术研究[J]. 林业科技情报, 2020, 52(1): 63-64, 66.
[11] 常富智, 李皓. 困难立地造林难点与对策研究[J]. 河南农业, 2019(26): 27-28.
[12] 刘姝玲, 刘巧红, 张婵婵. 榆林市定边县困难立地造林技术措施[J]. 防护林科技, 2024(5): 86-87.
[13] 丁亚飞, 徐永宏, 范建忠, 等. 赤皮青冈幼林植物-微生物-土壤生态化学计量特征对困难立地的响应[J/OL]. 生态学杂志: 1-12.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/21.1148.Q.20250825.1755.002, 2025-10-22.
[14] 游俊华. 落叶松、油松在困难立地条件下的造林关键技术[J]. 中国林业产业, 2025(6): 67-68.
[15] 王育文, 郭忠升. 陕西黄河流域生态保护和森林植被高质量发展建设对策[J]. 人民黄河, 2021, 43(6): 6-9, 15.