市域产教联合体的制度逻辑冲突及其协同治理路径——基于双重理性张力的视角

Institutional Logic Conflicts and Pathways to Collaborative Governance in Municipal Industry-Education Consortia—A Perspective on Tensions between Dual Rationalities

摘要: 市域产教联合体作为推进职业教育体系改革的核心载体，当前面临治理结构虚化、利益机制不彰、评价准则错位及育人价值边缘化等现实困境。基于制度逻辑理论，本文在坚持工具理性与价值理性“双重理性”主线的基础上，引入逻辑多元性、逻辑混合性与权力关系分析，揭示市场、国家、专业与社群等逻辑在市域场域中的交互作用，进而说明目标导向异质、时间维度非对称、议程设置失衡及组织认同偏差是制约运行效能的核心症结。在此基础上提出，通过比较不同实体化治理形式、构建利益补偿公式与多元评价指标体系，并辅以数字平台支撑和风险边界约束，推动工具效能与育人本质在制度层面的耦合共生，为优化区域产教融合生态提供更具操作性的理论支撑与实践方向。

Abstract: As a key institutional vehicle for advancing vocational education reform, municipal industry-education consortia face persistent challenges, including hollow governance structures, weak incentive and benefit-sharing mechanisms, misaligned evaluation criteria, and the marginalization of educational values. Drawing on the institutional logics perspective, this study analyzes these challenges in relation to instrumental and value rationalities, while incorporating multiple institutional logics, logic hybridity, and power relations into the analysis. It shows how market, state, professional, and community logics interact within the municipal field and argues that divergent goal orientations, asymmetric temporal horizons, agenda-setting imbalances, and misaligned organizational identities are the principal constraints on consortium effectiveness. In response, the study proposes an institutional optimization framework that compares alternative organizational forms of governance, develops a formula-based benefit-compensation mechanism and a multidimensional evaluation system, and supports implementation through digital platforms and clearly defined risk-governance boundaries. By promoting closer alignment between instrumental efficiency and the educational mission, the study provides theoretical insight and practical guidance for improving regional industry-education integration ecosystems.