宋代经学影响下的士人身份认同与文体选择
Scholar Identity and Literary Genre Choice under the Influence of Song Dynasty Classical Studies
DOI: 10.12677/cnc.2026.142077, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张申平:重庆科技大学设计与人文学院,重庆;李荣菊:重庆科技大学图书馆,重庆
关键词: 宋代经学士人身份文体选择义理转型Song Dynasty Classical Studies Scholar Identity Literary Genre Choice Transformation toward Philosophical Principle
摘要: 本文探讨宋代经学转型对士人身份认同与文体选择的深层影响。宋代经学从汉唐注疏之学转向义理阐发,促使士人身份从记诵之儒转化为义理探求者与道德实践者,并因学派兴起而呈现群体化特征。士人在学者与文人双重身份间动态调适,形成“学者型文人”或“文人型学者”的普遍形态。身份认同直接驱动其文体选择,经义、经解、语录成为学者身份的核心载体,古文因载道功能与表达自由成为整合多重身份的理想文体,诗歌则融入理性思辨与学问积淀,形成“以议论为诗”“以学问为诗”的宋调特色。文章通过分析欧阳修、苏轼、朱熹等个案揭示思想、身份与文体三者的动态共生关系,阐明宋代士人在经学思潮与文体传统间的创造性转化,是宋代文化达到高峰的内在机理。
Abstract: This article examines the profound impact of the transformation of Classical Studies in the Song Dynasty on scholar identity and literary genre choice. Shifting from the exegetical and textual commentary focus of the Han and Tang eras toward an emphasis on philosophical principle and moral introspection, Song Classical Studies prompted scholars to reconceive their identity from masters of memorization to seekers of principles and practitioners of morality. This identity was further concretized and collectivized through the rise of scholarly schools. Scholars dynamically negotiated between their identities as learned scholars and literati, commonly embodying a hybrid “scholar-literati” or “literati-scholar” persona. This identity negotiation directly drove their choice of literary genres: interpretive essays, commentaries, and recorded sayings became core textual forms for the scholarly identity; ancient-style prose, valued for its capacity to convey moral principles and expressive freedom, became the ideal genre for integrating multiple identities; and poetry was infused with rational discourse and erudition, giving rise to distinctive Song poetic features such as “using argumentation in poetry” and “using learning in poetry”. Through case studies of figures like Ouyang Xiu, Su Shi, and Zhu Xi, the article reveals the dynamic interplay between intellectual thought, identity formation, and genre selection. It argues that the creative adaptation of scholars amidst the currents of Classical Studies and literary traditions constituted the internal mechanism behind the cultural zenith achieved in the Song Dynasty.
文章引用:张申平, 李荣菊. 宋代经学影响下的士人身份认同与文体选择[J]. 国学, 2026, 14(2): 542-552. https://doi.org/10.12677/cnc.2026.142077

参考文献

[1] 陈寅恪. 邓广铭《宋史职官志考证》序[M]//金明馆丛稿二编. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1980: 245.
[2] 徐复观. 中国艺术精神[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁人民出版社, 2023: 9.
[3] 漆侠. 宋学的发展和演变[M]. 石家庄: 河北人民出版社, 2002: 396.
[4] (美)包弼德, 著. 斯文 唐宋思想的转型[M]. 刘宁, 译. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2017: 187.
[5] 莫砺锋. 朱熹文学研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2023: 10.
[6] 刘成国. 荆公新学研究[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2023: 5.
[7] 方笑一. 经学、科举与宋代古文[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2017: 9-10.
[8] 马积高. 宋明理学与文学[M]. 武汉: 崇文书局, 2023: 3.
[9] 马茂军. 北宋儒学与文学[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 1999: 51.
[10] 高明峰. 北宋经学与文学[M]. 北京: 中国书籍出版社, 2019: 3.
[11] (清)纪昀. 钦定四库全书总目[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1997: 190.
[12] 牟宗三. 心体与性体(上) [M]. 长春: 吉林出版集团有限责任公司, 2013: 15.
[13] (清)永瑢. 《四库全书总目》卷一八七[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1965: 1699.
[14] (宋)程颢, 程颐. 《河南程氏遗书》卷十八[M]//二程集. 北京: 中华书局, 1981: 187.
[15] (宋)朱熹. 四书章句集注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1983: 364.
[16] (元)脱脱: 《宋史》卷三百二十七《王安石传》 [M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1977: 10550.
[17] (元)朱右. 三史钩玄序[M]//李修生, 主编. 《全元文(第五十册)》卷一五四七. 南京: 凤凰出版社, 2004: 536.
[18] (宋)欧阳修. 与张秀才第二书[M]//《欧阳修全集》卷六十七. 北京: 中华书局, 2001: 978.
[19] (宋)黎靖德. 《朱子语类》卷一三九[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1994: 3305.
[20] 冷成金. 苏轼、朱熹文艺观之比较[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 1996(3): 84-90, 127.
[21] (宋)苏轼. 议学校贡举状[M]//苏轼文集. 北京: 中华书局, 1986: 724.
[22] (宋)严羽. 沧浪诗话[M]//历代诗话. 北京: 中华书局, 1982: 688.
[23] (宋)范仲淹. 《范文正公文集》卷八[M]//范仲淹全集. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 2007: 183.
[24] (元)苏天爵. 《滋溪文稿》卷三十[M]//欧阳修集编年笺注(八). 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2007: 580.
[25] (金)赵秉文. 《闲闲老人滏水文集附补遗》卷十五《竹溪先生文集引》 [M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1985: 205.
[26] 王水照. 苏轼选集∙前言[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1984: 8.
[27] 钱穆. 朱子新学案[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 1987: 846.
[28] (清)刘熙载. 艺概∙诗概[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1978: 69.
[29] (明)孙承恩. 书朱文公感兴诗后[M]//东岩集 文简集 方斋存稿. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1983: 459.
[30] 祝尚书. 论宋代理学家的“新文统” [J]. 文学遗产, 2006(4): 80-92, 159.