制度型开放对生产性服务业数字化转型的影响研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据
Research on the Impact of Institutional Opening-Up on the Digital Transformation of Producer Services—Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.154392, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张守华:南京邮电大学经济学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 制度型开放生产性服务业企业数字化转型上市公司Institutional Opening-Up Producer Services Enterprise Digital Transformation Listed Company
摘要: 制度型开放是我国推进高质量发展与国际经济合作的重大举措,为产业数字化转型提供了重要契机。基于2008~2022年中国沪深A股上市公司数据,构建双重差分模型,以丝绸之路经济带建设为准自然实验实证考察了制度型开放对生产性服务业数字化转型的影响效应。研究发现,制度型开放能显著促进生产性服务业数字化转型。异质性结果表明,制度型开放对非国有企业、中低端生产性服务业企业具有显著促进作用。机制检验表明,制度型开放能通过研发投入促进效应、逆向知识溢出效应和数字生态构建效应等渠道促进生产性服务业数字化转型。研究结论为完善推进高质量制度型开放,推动我国生产性服务业数字化水平提升提供了经验证据。
Abstract: Institutional opening-up is a significant measure for China to promote high-quality development and international economic cooperation, providing an important opportunity for the digital transformation of industries. Based on data from Chinese listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets from 2008 to 2022, a difference-in-differences model is constructed to empirically examine the impact of institutional opening-up on the digital transformation of productive service industries, using the construction of the Silk Road Economic Belt as a quasi-natural experiment. The study finds that institutional opening-up can significantly promote the digital transformation of productive service industries. Heterogeneity results indicate that institutional opening-up has a significant promoting effect on non-state-owned enterprises and mid-to-low-end productive service industry enterprises. Mechanism tests show that institutional opening-up can promote the digital transformation of productive service industries through channels such as the promotion effect of R&D investment, reverse knowledge spillover effect, and digital ecosystem construction effect. The research conclusion provides empirical evidence for improving and promoting high-quality institutional opening-up and enhancing the digitalization level of China’s productive service industries.
文章引用:张守华. 制度型开放对生产性服务业数字化转型的影响研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(4): 242-252. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.154392

参考文献

[1] Strohmaier, R., Schuetz, M. and Vannuccini, S. (2019) A Systemic Perspective on Socioeconomic Transformation in the Digital Age. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46, 361-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 卢盛峰, 董如玉, 叶初升. “一带一路”倡议促进了中国高质量出口吗——来自微观企业的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(3): 80-98.
[3] 李芳芳, 冯帆. “一带一路”倡议、数字化转型与中国企业创新[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2023, 44(9): 85-105.
[4] 吕越, 陆毅, 吴嵩博, 王勇. “一带一路”倡议的对外投资促进效应——基于2005-2016年中国企业绿地投资的双重差分检验[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(9): 187-202.
[5] 徐思, 何晓怡, 钟凯. “一带一路”倡议与中国企业融资约束[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(7): 155-173.
[6] 吕炜, 王杰, 王伟同. 共建“一带一路”倡议与服务贸易合作——基于服务贸易网络视角[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(1): 1-19+50.
[7] Brühl, V. (2024) The Economic Rise of China—An Analysis of China’s Growth Drivers. International Economics and Economic Policy, 22, Article No. 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 于津平, 夏文豪. 对外直接投资推动企业数字化转型了吗——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2024, 40(5): 58-74.
[9] 赵宸宇, 王文春, 李雪松. 数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, 42(7): 114-129.
[10] 王桂军, 卢潇潇. “一带一路”倡议可以促进中国企业创新吗? [J]. 财经研究, 2019, 45(1): 19-34.
[11] Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., et al. (2018) Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Treatment and Structural Parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21, C1-C68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Yang, J., Chuang, H. and Kuan, C. (2020) Double Machine Learning with Gradient Boosting and Its Application to the Big N Audit Quality Effect. Journal of Econometrics, 216, 268-283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 马珍妙, 赵勇. “一带一路”倡议是否优化了地区营商环境——基于2007-2019年地级及以上城市数据的实证研究[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 38(6): 102-113.
[14] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
[15] 李学峰, 蔡新怡, 吕佳丽. 稳中求进还是革故鼎新?高管团队稳定性与企业数字化转型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(22): 140-151.
[16] 张旭娜, 吴建銮, 卢山冰. “一带一路”倡议提升了中国企业绿色技术创新水平吗[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(7): 45-56.
[17] 潘为华, 贺正楚, 潘红玉. 中国数字经济发展的时空演化和分布动态[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(10): 137-147.