长三角地区城镇化与碳金融创新水平对碳排放的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Urbanization and Carbon Finance Innovation Level on Carbon Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta Region
DOI: 10.12677/fia.2026.152032, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 荀守奎*, 李语桐:安徽理工大学经济与管理学院,安徽 淮南
关键词: 碳金融创新城镇化STIRPAT模型Carbon Finance Innovation Urbanization STIRPAT Model
摘要: 在全球气候治理与我国“双碳”目标推进背景下,面对长三角一体化中城镇化与低碳转型的矛盾,文章聚焦该区域城镇化进程中碳金融创新水平评价及对策的研究。通过构建评价指标体系,运用TOPSIS方法和改进的STIRPAT模型,结合岭回归分析,量化分析碳金融创新水平的区域差异,探讨其与城镇化、碳排放的耦合机制。研究结果表明,长三角碳金融创新与城镇化皆会对碳排放产生影响,并据此提出构建全域协同体系、强化低碳转型赋能、完善政策保障及深化区域协同治理等对策,为长三角地区低碳发展提供参考。
Abstract: In the context of global climate governance and the advancement of China’s “dual carbon” goal, in the face of the contradiction between urbanization and low-carbon transformation in the Yangtze River Delta integration process, this paper focuses on the research on the evaluation and countermeasures of carbon finance innovation level in the urbanization process of this region. By constructing an evaluation index system, using the TOPSIS method and the improved STIRPAT model, combined with ridge regression analysis, the regional differences in carbon finance innovation level are quantitatively analyzed, and the coupling mechanism between it, urbanization, and carbon emissions is explored. The research results show that both carbon finance innovation and urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta will have an impact on carbon emissions. Based on this, countermeasures such as constructing a regional collaborative system, strengthening low-carbon transformation empowerment, improving policy guarantees, and deepening regional collaborative governance are proposed, providing a reference for the low-carbon development of the Yangtze River Delta region.
文章引用:荀守奎, 李语桐. 长三角地区城镇化与碳金融创新水平对碳排放的影响研究[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2026, 15(2): 294-308. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2026.152032

参考文献

[1] 渠慎宁, 郭朝先. 基于STIRPAT模型的中国碳排放峰值预测研究[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2010, 20(12): 10-15.
[2] Sandor, R.L. (2017) How I Saw It: Analysis and Commentary on Environmental Finance (1999-2005). World Scientific Books. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Kossoy, A. and Ambrosi, P. (2010) State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010. World Bank.
[4] 李善燊, 赵蓉, 郝琪梦. 碳金融发展水平测度及影响因素研究——以碳交易试点七省市为例[J]. 金融发展评论, 2024, 15(11): 1-15.
[5] 王钇淞, 闻梓彦, 陈功, 等. 绿色金融对苏州重点产业碳减排的影响效应研究[J]. 中国商论, 2024(3): 120-124.
[6] 陈智颖, 许林, 钱崇秀. 中国碳金融发展水平测度及其动态演化[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2020, 37(8): 62-82.
[7] Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. (1991) Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[8] Satterthwaite, D. (2009) The Implications of Population Growth and Urbanization for Climate Change. Environment and Urbanization, 21, 545-567.
[9] Cheng, Z.H., Wang, L. (2023) Can New Urbanization Improve Urban Total-Factor Energy Efficiency in China? Energy, 266, Article 126494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 陈诗一. 能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J]. 经济研究, 2009, 44(4): 41-55.
[11] 陈姜全, 李效顺, 耿艺伟, 刘希朝, 李光亮. 中国城镇化与碳排放机制分析及实证研究——基于经济发展、人口转移和城镇扩张视角[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(6): 1399-1417.
[12] 常新锋, 管鑫. 新型城镇化进程中长三角城市群生态效率的时空演变及影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(3): 185-195.
[13] Dietz, T. and Rosa, E.A. (1997) Effects of Population and Affluence on CO2 Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 175-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] York, R., Rosa, E.A. and Dietz, T. (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and Impact: Analytic Tools for Unpacking the Driving Forces of Environmental Impacts. Ecological Economics, 46, 351-365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 刘晓燕. 基于STIRPAT模型的工业能源消费碳排放影响因素分析[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(3): 27-31.
[16] 丛建辉. 碳中和愿景下中国城市形态的碳排放影响效应研究——基于289个地级市的数据分析[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2021(9): 125-134.
[17] 何建坤, 卢兰兰, 王海林. 经济增长与二氧化碳减排的双赢路径分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(10): 9-17.
[18] 国务院关于进一步推进长江三角洲地区改革开放和经济社会发展的指导意见[J]. 中国对外经济贸易文告, 2008(62): 12-19.
[19] 长江三角洲城市群发展规划获通过[J]. 中国勘察设计, 2016(6): 6.
[20] 胡晗. 长三角城市群多维城镇化对碳排放的空间效应与影响机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2023.
[21] 范振月, 赵梦真, 公维凤, 王传会. 基于STIRPAT模型的碳排放影响因素及峰值研究——以山东省为例[J]. 低碳经济, 2020, 9(2): 100-110.
[22] 康子冉, 丁韦娜. 中国碳交易市场发展的内在逻辑和路径选择[J]. 中国物价, 2022(5): 98-101.