数字化转型对负债融资效率的影响研究——以海尔智家为例
Research on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Debt Financing Efficiency—A Case Study of Haier Smart Home
摘要: 随着信息技术与人工智能的发展,传统制造企业正深入推进数字化转型,以重构生产流程、优化资源配置并建立可持续竞争优势。在此背景下,探究企业数字化转型对负债融资效率的影响具有重要理论与现实意义。本文以海尔智家2012~2024年数据为样本,通过构建数字化水平评价体系与数据包络分析模型,系统考察其数字化转型及对负债融资效率的影响。结果显示,海尔智家整体数字化水平较高(综合得分78.98分),呈现“硬实力强、软变现弱”特征,即智能制造与平台建设突出,商业模式创新与价值实现仍有提升空间。采用数据包络分析模型对负债融资效率进行测度,发现:(1) 负债融资综合效率呈现“技术强、规模弱”特征;(2) “单位债务融资成本创收率”呈先降后升的“V型”轨迹;(3) 转型深化期存在“研发与无形资产投入冗余”与“债务融资成本偏高、盈利转化不足”并存的结构性矛盾。基于此,从深化价值转化、优化融资结构等方面提出对策建议。
Abstract: With the advancement of information technology and artificial intelligence, traditional manufacturing enterprises are deepening their digital transformation to restructure production processes, optimize resource allocation, and establish sustainable competitive advantages. Against this backdrop, exploring the impact of corporate digital transformation on debt financing efficiency holds significant theoretical and practical importance. Using Haier Smart Home’s data from 2012 to 2024 as a sample, this study systematically examines its digital transformation and its effects on debt financing efficiency by constructing a digital maturity evaluation system and a data envelopment analysis model. The results show that Haier Smart Home maintains a relatively high overall digital maturity (with a comprehensive score of 78.98 points), characterized by “strong technical capabilities but weak soft monetization”, meaning its smart manufacturing and platform development are outstanding, while there remains room for improvement in business model innovation and value realization. By employing the data envelopment analysis model to measure debt financing efficiency, the study finds: (1) the comprehensive efficiency of debt financing exhibits a “strong technology, weak scale” pattern; (2) the “cost-to-revenue ratio of unit debt financing” follows a “V-shaped” trajectory, initially declining and then rising; (3) during the deepening transformation phase, a structural contradiction emerges where “excessive R&D and intangible asset investment” coexists with “relatively high debt financing costs and insufficient profit conversion”. Based on these findings, strategic recommendations are proposed to deepen value transformation and optimize financing structures.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张媛, 张晓会. 现代种企数字化转型中财务管理创新策略[J]. 分子植物育种, 2025, 23(18): 6331-6336.
|
|
[2]
|
郑婷婷, 张瑞镅. 数字经济下电商物流企业成本控制与绩效评价[J]. 会计之友, 2025(S1): 45-48.
|
|
[3]
|
三部门关于印发《制造业企业数字化转型实施指南》的通知, https://www.miit.gov.cn/zwgk/zcwj/wjfb/tz/art/2024/art_a277e626fcdb4082918e838e6d042bb3.html,2026.2.4
|
|
[4]
|
刘勤. 技术发展赋能会计变革[J]. 会计之友, 2021(19): 8-13.
|
|
[5]
|
汪立元, 彭静文. 企业数字化技术对审计质量的影响机制研究——基于新质生产力背景[J]. 会计之友, 2025(S2): 33-41.
|
|
[6]
|
刘瑾, 赵纳晖, 徐松. 数字化持续投入、内部控制与企业全要素生产率[J]. 统计与决策, 2025, 41(18): 165-170.
|
|
[7]
|
童士元, 林阳文, 叶丹华, 等. 数字化转型如何促进制造业企业高质量发展——基于财务柔性的分析[J]. 财务研究, 2025(5): 100-112.
|
|
[8]
|
冯霞, 康文华, 李向荣. 政府补助、市场竞争与企业数字化转型[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2025(10): 110-115.
|
|
[9]
|
刘和旺, 李修玉, 郑世林. 智能制造政策对企业新质生产力的影响研究[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2025, 40(4): 50-65.
|
|
[10]
|
罗建强, 蒋倩雯. 数字化转型下产品与服务创新优先级演化分析——基于海尔智家案例[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(9): 1710-1720.
|
|
[11]
|
王斌. 海尔智家数字化转型的动因、路径及绩效研究[J]. 航空财会, 2025, 7(6): 32-37.
|
|
[12]
|
程杰贤, 刘文龙. 供应链金融驱动企业动态能力阶梯式演进的机制研究——基于海尔智家的多阶段检验[J]. 财会通讯, 2025(18): 97-102.
|
|
[13]
|
许林, 唐璐, 徐玉发. 数字化转型、创新活力对企业融资约束的缓释效应[J]. 南方金融, 2023(11): 3-18.
|
|
[14]
|
马欣欣, 尹伟伟. 数字化转型对流通企业融资效率的影响——基于供应链集成视角[J]. 商业经济研究, 2022(19): 25-28.
|
|
[15]
|
王康, 谢金娜, 肖琼琪. 企业数字化转型、价值共创与供应链韧性[J]. 统计研究, 2025, 42(10): 34-48.
|
|
[16]
|
孙绿茵. 厦门象屿供应链数字化转型路径及绩效研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东技术师范大学, 2025.
|