直播竞争性连麦中的互动仪式与电子商务转化——基于抖音娱乐类直播的实证研究
Interactive Ritual and E-Commerce Conversion in Live Streaming Competitive Co-Hosting—An Empirical Study Based on Douyin Entertainment Live Streaming
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.155494, PDF,   
作者: 陈 委:南京林业大学人文社会科学学院、生态文明传播学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 直播竞争性连麦互动仪式链情感能量用户打赏符号消费Live Streaming Competitive Co-Hosting Interactive Ritual Chain Emotional Energy User Tipping Symbolic Consumption
摘要: 直播竞争性连麦是抖音核心互动与变现模式,商业价值凸显。基于互动仪式链理论,本文探讨娱乐类直播竞争性连麦互动仪式构建对用户消费行为的影响。通过参与式观察与半结构访谈发现,直播竞争性连麦以虚拟在场、排他性屏障、共同关注焦点和情感连带构建高度凝聚的互动仪式。该仪式产出的情感能量、群体符号、群体团结和道德荣誉感,是驱动用户情感付费、符号消费转化为平台与主播核心收入的关键机制。然而,内容同质化、主播情感失范和用户身份脆弱性等问题,削弱了情感能量持续性和用户付费意愿,挑战长期商业转化。研究从主播、平台、用户等不同层面提出解决意见,以实现直播竞争性连麦商业价值的可持续发展。
Abstract: Live streaming competitive co-hosting is Douyin’s core interactive and monetization model, highlighting its commercial value. Based on the theory of interactive ritual chains, this paper explores the impact of constructing interactive rituals in entertainment live streaming competitive co-hosting on user consumption behavior. Through participatory observation and semi-structured interviews, it is found that live streaming competitive co-hosting constructs a highly cohesive interactive ritual through virtual presence, exclusive barriers, shared focal points, and emotional bonding. The emotional energy, group symbols, group solidarity, and moral honor generated by this ritual are key mechanisms driving users’ emotional payments and symbolic consumption to become the core revenue for platforms and streamers. However, issues such as content homogenization, emotional deviance of streamers, and user identity fragility weaken the sustainability of emotional energy and users’ willingness to pay, challenging long-term commercial transformation. The study proposes solutions from different levels, including streamers, platforms, and users, to achieve sustainable development of the commercial value of live streaming competitive co-hosting.
文章引用:陈委. 直播竞争性连麦中的互动仪式与电子商务转化——基于抖音娱乐类直播的实证研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(5): 105-112. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.155494

参考文献

[1] 吴博. 虚拟狂欢与身体在场——电竞直播弹幕与传统体育现场呐喊的互动符号学比较[J]. 新闻前哨, 2025(16): 78-80.
[2] 刘艳娥, 彭承越. 乡村直播电商中的符号建构及互动机制研究[J]. 传媒论坛, 2024, 7(23): 33-36.
[3] 熊梦琪, 杨涛. 互动仪式链视角下电商直播中消费者购买意愿研究——基于抖音直播间的参与式观察[J]. 新闻传播, 2024(1): 61-63.
[4] 董晨宇, 丁依然, 叶蓁. 制造亲密: 中国网络秀场直播中的商品化关系及其不稳定性[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(3): 137-151.
[5] 王喆, 贺果沙. 从虚拟礼物到概率游戏: 秀场直播平台“惊喜盒子”的交换网络与不确定性文化[J]. 中国青年研究, 2024(2): 24-34.
[6] 武靖宇. 连麦直播: 于“弱连接”世界中打造“强互动”——以《今夜连连看》为例[J]. 声屏世界, 2021(20): 101-103+108.
[7] 朱姿宣. 媒介人性化逻辑下“连麦”功能重塑直播情境探究[J]. 新媒体研究, 2022, 8(22): 91-93.
[8] 邓昕. 被遮蔽的情感之维: 兰德尔∙柯林斯互动仪式链理论诠释[J]. 新闻界, 2020(8): 40-47+95.
[9] 兰德尔∙柯林斯, 著. 互动仪式链[M]. 林聚任, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009: 212-220.
[10] Zhu, Y.Y. (2021) Research on the Value Transmission of Music Education in Colleges and Universities from the Perspective of Interactive Ritual Chain. 2021 International Conference on Modern Education, Management and Social Science Research, Madrid, 30-31 October 2021, 300-304.
[11] 于雪姣. 抖音“APP”的内容运营研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019.
[12] 蔡卓尔, 惠悲荷. 线上演唱会的虚拟在场研究——基于互动仪式链视角[J]. 新媒体研究, 2022, 8(8): 23-25, 58.
[13] 王昀. 礼物、娱乐及群体交往: 网络视频文化的公共性考察[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2017, 24(9): 61-78, 127.
[14] 胡翼青, 吴越. 凯瑞的“仪式观”: 美国文化研究本土化的困局[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2014, 21(6): 49-60, 127.
[15] 贾毅. 网络秀场直播的“兴”与“哀”——人际交互∙狂欢盛宴∙文化陷阱[J]. 编辑之友, 2016(11): 42-48.