考虑主播营销努力的品牌商退货运费险策略选择研究
Research on the Selection of Brand Merchants’ Return Freight Insurance Strategies Considering the Marketing Efforts of Anchors
摘要: 针对直播消费者的退货问题,采取何种退货运费险策略成为品牌商面临的难题。本文考虑需求与退货同时受主播营销努力的影响,建立3种退货运费险模型,运用博弈理论求解供应链各成员的最优决策与最优利润,并进行主要参数的敏感性分析以及对比模型均衡解。研究表明:(1) 3种运费险策略下,产品最优价格和品牌商利润均与主播营销努力需求系数和退货系数正相关。(2) 产品价格和主播营销努力投入水平在品牌商提供运费险策略下最大,而在无运费险策略下最小。(3) 品牌商应将运费险服务引入直播渠道,尤其当消费者对退货成本敏感程度较高时,品牌商提供退货运费险是最优策略。
Abstract: What kind of return shipping insurance strategy to adopt for live streaming consumers’ return issues has become a challenge for brand owners. This article considers the impact of both demand and returns on the marketing efforts of the anchor, establishes three return shipping insurance models, uses game theory to solve the optimal decisions and profits of each member of the supply chain, and conducts sensitivity analysis of the main parameters and compares the equilibrium solutions of the models. Research has shown that: (1) Under three shipping insurance strategies, the optimal price of the product and the brand’s profit are positively correlated with the anchor’s marketing effort demand coefficient and return coefficient. (2) The product price and the level of marketing effort invested by the anchor are highest under the brand’s shipping insurance strategy, while they are lowest under the no shipping insurance strategy. (3) Brand owners should introduce shipping insurance services into live streaming channels, especially when consumers are highly sensitive to return costs. Providing return shipping insurance is the optimal strategy for brand owners.
文章引用:黄江林, 申彦. 考虑主播营销努力的品牌商退货运费险策略选择研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(5): 152-162. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.155500

参考文献

[1] 张鑫, 张杰. 直播背景下电商供应链混合渠道定价与选择策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2025, 34(1): 27-39.
[2] 谢晓妮. 基于RPA4.0的智慧税务管理研究——以网络直播业务为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2025(16): 146-151.
[3] Bian, Y. and Xiao, T. (2025) Returns Management in a Supply Chain Considering Freight Insurance and Consumer Disappointment Aversion. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 195, Article 103975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Chen, Z., Fan, Z. and Zhao, X. (2021) Offering Return-Freight Insurance or Not: Strategic Analysis of an E-Seller’s Decisions. Omega, 103, Article 102447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 谢军, 黄鹤. 考虑消费者退货的电商平台营销策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 313-324.
[6] Zhang, C., Yu, M. and Chen, J. (2022) Signaling Quality with Return Insurance: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Management Science, 68, 5847-5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 郑春东, 刘一凡, 邹孟. 退货运费险对网购消费者购买意愿的影响[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 9(2): 150-156.
[8] 司凤山, 余真, 王晶. 消费者风险厌恶的运费险分担机制与供应链定价研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2024, 46(3): 419-425.
[9] Wang, T. (2025) Is Streamer Live-Stream Favorable to Merchant Live-Stream? The Effect of Pre-and Post-Effort. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 85, Article 104314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 董经洋, 关志民, 于天阳, 等. 考虑网红直播带货的双渠道供应链决策与协调[J/OL]. 管理工程学报, 1-15. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2025.06.020, 2025-10-20.[CrossRef
[11] Xu, W., Zhang, X.H., Chen, R.Y. and Yang, Z. (2023) How Do You Say It Matters? A Multimodal Analytics Framework for Product Return Prediction in Live Streaming E-Commerce. Decision Support Systems, 172, Article 113984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Zhao, L., Guo, W., Fang, S. and An, Q. (2024) Enhancing Supply Chain Coordination through Transparency Initiatives to Mitigate Product Returns. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, Article 103756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 武鹏星, 何新华, 胡文发. 考虑产品退货的制造商质量与服务决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(2): 92-99.