公司法下电商企业ESG治理与小股东权益保障研究
Research on ESG Governance and Minority Shareholders’ Rights Protection of E-Commerce Enterprises under the Company Law
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.155508, PDF,   
作者: 韩可凡:浙江理工大学法学与人文学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 电子商务ESG小股东保护公司法E-Commerce ESG Minority Shareholder Protection Company Law
摘要: 随着《公司法》的修订实施,ESG理念深度融入公司治理模式,电商企业小股东权益保护获得新的制度方向,通过ESG治理的去中心化重构、董事信义义务拓展,让原有股东中心主义结构转向覆盖更多利益相关方的新结构,最终赋予小股东更多行权空间。通过梳理新《公司法》在控股股东责任强化、小股东赋权机制完善及信息披露义务优化的制度突破,肯定其为ESG框架下小股东权益建立保障。但当前我国ESG信息披露监管尚未落实到位,电商企业的数据治理、算法透明、平台生态等领域的ESG披露仍存在多处问题,小股东参与公司治理的机制也存在运行障碍。通过建立统一ESG披露标准、加大监管执行强度、调整独立董事占比保障独立董事独立性,推动电商企业ESG治理与小股东权益保障深度结合。
Abstract: With the implementation of the revised “Company Law”, the concept of ESG has been deeply integrated into corporate governance models, providing e-commerce enterprises with a new institutional direction for protecting minority shareholders’ rights and interests. This article focuses on two logical discussions: the decentralized reconstruction of ESG governance and the expansion of directors’ fiduciary duties. It aims to shift the original shareholder-centric structure to a new structure that covers more stakeholders, ultimately granting minority shareholders more room for exercising their rights. By examining the institutional breakthroughs of the new “Company Law” in three aspects: strengthening the responsibilities of controlling shareholders, improving the empowerment mechanism for minority shareholders, and optimizing information disclosure obligations, this article affirms its role in establishing safeguards for minority shareholders’ rights and interests under the ESG framework. Currently, China’s ESG information disclosure supervision has not yet been fully implemented, and there are still many issues in e-commerce enterprises’ ESG disclosure in areas such as data governance, algorithm transparency, and platform ecology. The mechanism for minority shareholders to participate in corporate governance also faces operational obstacles. By establishing unified ESG disclosure standards, strengthening regulatory enforcement, and adjusting the proportion of independent directors to ensure their independence, we can promote the deep integration of e-commerce enterprises’ ESG governance with the protection of minority shareholders’ rights and interests.
文章引用:韩可凡. 公司法下电商企业ESG治理与小股东权益保障研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(5): 216-224. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.155508

参考文献

[1] 郑少华, 王慧. ESG的演变、逻辑及其实现[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2024, 26(4): 124-138.
[2] Macey, J.R. (1991) An Economic Analysis of the Various Rationales for Making Shareholders the Exclusive Beneficiaries of Corporate Fiduciary Duties. Stetson Law Review, 21, 23-44.
[3] 高友雪, 张波. 大股东中心主义治理模式下中小股东控制权争夺——基于ST曙光控制权争夺的案例[J]. 财会通讯, 2024(6): 104-110.
[4] 刘俊海. 股东中心主义的再认识[J]. 政法论坛, 2021, 39(5): 83-95.
[5] 刘俊海. 论《公司法》的法典化: 由碎片化走向体系化的思考[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2024, 42(1): 15-33.
[6] 杨鑫洁, 孔令学. ESG视角下小股东权益保护问题研究——基于新《公司法》实施的背景[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2024(11): 85-92.
[7] 弗雷德里克·S·米什金. 货币金融学[M]. 第5版. 蒋先玲, 译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2020: 157.
[8] 蒋大兴. ESG对董事义务的改造: 从商业判断到社会判断的进化[J]. 中国法学, 2024(4): 88-109.
[9] Beebeejaun, A. and Bissessur, P. (2024) The Business Judgment Rule as a Protective Armor for Directors’ Responsibilities: A Comparative Study among Mauritius, United Kingdom, and United States. Statute Law Review, 45, hmae028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 赵磊. 公司法上信义义务的体系构成——兼评新《公司法》相关规定[J]. 财经法学, 2024(3): 67-80.
[11] 史永东, 王淏淼. 企业社会责任与公司价值——基于ESG风险溢价的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(6): 67-83.
[12] Gadinis, S. and Miazad, A. (2020) Corporate Law and Social Risk. Vanderbilt Law Review, 5, Article 1410.
[13] 林一英. 《公司法》第二次修订对公司法律制度的完善与未来展望[J]. 法学家, 2024(4): 89-102+193.
[14] Hazen, T.L. (2021) Social Issues in the Spotlight: The Increasing Need to Improve Publicly-Held Companies’ CSR and ESG Disclosures. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 23, 740-796.
[15] 李传轩, 张叶东. 上市公司ESG信息披露监管的法理基础与制度构建[J]. 江汉论坛, 2024(9): 140-144.
[16] 胡苑, 金权. 中国ESG信息披露制度的实践检视与优化进路[J]. 环境保护, 2024, 52(19): 12-15.
[17] 郭雳. 注册制下我国上市公司信息披露制度的重构与完善[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2020(9): 92-101.
[18] 饶艳超, 何俊. 证券行业国内外机构ESG评级差异分析[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2024(7): 112-116.
[19] 管涛, 汪永福. 上市公司ESG信息披露: 模式比较、风险审视与纾解路向[J]. 西南金融, 2024(9): 43-53.
[20] 陈骁, 张明. 通过ESG投资助推经济结构转型: 国际经验与中国实践[J]. 学术研究, 2022(8): 92-98.
[21] 李燕. 利益相关者保护的《公司法》表达: 结构与可能[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2023, 26(5): 109-120.
[22] 王鹏程, 黄世忠, 范勋, 等. 制定中国可持续披露准则若干问题研究[J]. 财会月刊, 2023, 44(15): 11-22.
[23] 王鹏程. 可持续发展信息披露中的审计委员会职责与政策建议[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(18): 98-103.
[24] 彭雨晨. ESG信息披露制度优化: 欧盟经验与中国镜鉴[J]. 证券市场导报, 2023(11): 43-55.
[25] 刘俊海. 论公司ESG信息披露的制度设计: 保护消费者等利益相关者的新视角[J]. 法律适用, 2023(5): 18-31.
[26] 周嘉. 股东权益保护在公司治理中的法律保障与实施路径[J]. 西部学刊, 2024(24): 90-93.
[27] 任中玲. 浅谈中小股东权益保护制度的完善[J]. 大陆桥视野, 2022(5): 111-112.
[28] Arora, A. and Singh, A. (2021) Board Characteristics and Financial Performance: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Corporate Ownership and Control, 19, 188-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Goel, A., Dhiman, R., Rana, S. and Srivastava, V. (2022) Board Composition and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Indian Companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14, 771-789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Arora, A. and Soni, T.K. (2023) An Optimal Proportion for Independent Directors in the Boardroom: An Empirical Study. Business Perspectives and Research, 20, Article 227853372311704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 赵彦, 文冬梅. ESG管理体系建设可助力世界一流企业创建[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2023(4): 102-106.