博弈论视角下直播电商定价策略与消费者决策互动研究
Research on Pricing Strategy and Consumer Decision Interaction in Live-Streaming E-Commerce from the Perspective of Game Theory
摘要: 直播电商的爆发式增长使“主播–商家–消费者”三方利益博弈日益复杂,定价策略作为核心利益分配机制,直接影响三方决策与平台生态可持续性。本文基于斯塔克尔伯格博弈理论,构建主播主导的三方博弈模型,融合Logit模型刻画消费者异质性选择行为,系统分析主播佣金比例、产品质量对商家供货定价、消费者购买决策的互动影响机制。通过数值仿真验证模型有效性,研究发现:主播佣金与商家定价呈倒“U”型关系,佣金比例超过35%后会显著抑制商家定价积极性;产品质量对消费者选择的影响系数是价格敏感系数的1.8倍,高质量产品可容忍15%~20%的溢价空间;三方均衡定价策略下,平台整体转化率较随机定价提升,商家利润与消费者剩余也有不同程度增长。研究结论为直播电商三方主体的定价决策与平台规则优化提供了理论支撑与实践参考。
Abstract: The explosive growth of live-streaming e-commerce has made the tripartite interest game among streamers, merchants, and consumers increasingly complex. As a core mechanism for interest distribution, pricing strategies directly influence the decisions of all three parties and the sustainability of the platform ecosystem. Based on the Stackelberg game theory, this paper constructs a streamer-led tripartite game model, which incorporates the Logit model to characterize consumers’ heterogeneous choice behaviors, and systematically analyzes the interactive impact mechanisms of streamers’ commission rates and product quality on merchants’ supply pricing and consumers’ purchase decisions. The validity of the model is verified through numerical simulation. The findings reveal that: There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between streamers’ commissions and merchants’ pricing, and merchants’ pricing enthusiasm is significantly inhibited when the commission rate exceeds 35%; The impact coefficient of product quality on consumer choice is 1.8 times that of the price sensitivity coefficient, and high-quality products can tolerate a premium range of 15%~20%; Under the tripartite equilibrium pricing strategy, the overall platform conversion rate improves compared with random pricing, and merchants’ profits and consumer surplus increase to varying degrees. The conclusions of this study provide theoretical support and practical references for the pricing decisions of the three parties in live-streaming e-commerce and the optimization of platform rules.
文章引用:罗丹. 博弈论视角下直播电商定价策略与消费者决策互动研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(5): 566-575. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.155552

参考文献

[1] 艾瑞咨询. 2025年中国直播电商行业研究报告[R]. 北京: 艾瑞咨询集团, 2025.
[2] 梁喜, 刘怀英, 胡诗艺. 直播模式对电商供应链定价与质量决策的影响研究——基于制造商店铺自播与委托主播带货两种模式的比较分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2022(9): 154-157.
[3] 王芹鹏, 吴鹏. 考虑引流作用与定价权的网红直播带货定价策略分析[J]. 科技和产业, 2023, 23(2): 14-23.
[4] Lu, S., Yao, D., Chen, X. and Grewal, R. (2021) Do Larger Audiences Generate Greater Revenues under Pay What You Want? Evidence from a Live Streaming Platform. Marketing Science, 40, 964-984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 李恒宇, 柴俊武. 溢出效应下制造商的直播带货策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 171-181.
[6] 谢识予. 经济博弈论[M]. 第5版. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2023.
[7] 赵菊, 刘龙, 王艳, 等. 基于电商平台的供应商竞争和模式选择研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(8): 2058-2069.
[8] 何鹏, 尚琦, 王先甲, 等. “直播+” 背景下考虑平台监管的电商供应链演化博弈分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2023, 43(8): 2366-2379.
[9] 胡娇, 李莉, 张华, 等. 考虑参照效应和主播影响力的网络直播平台动态定价决策[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(3): 755-766.
[10] 程永伟. 直播带货中主播与商家合作模式及决策优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 297-306.
[11] McFadden, D. (1974) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. Academic Press.
[12] 唐可欣, 何向. 直播电商背景下线上商家与主播的合作模式及定价策略研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(8): 1131-1140.
[13] 熊浩, 陈锦怡, 鄢慧丽, 等. 考虑主播特征的直播带货双渠道供应链定价与协调[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(4): 188-195.