跨境电商平台算法合谋的国际竞争法规制研究
Research on the Regulatory Framework of International Competition Law for Algorithmic Collusion by Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms
摘要: 在数字经济全球化背景下,算法技术深度嵌入跨境电商定价、流量分配及广告竞价等关键业务环节,催生出兼具跨境传导性、去中心化与供应链联动特征的算法合谋行为。该类行为突破传统垄断协议认定边界,构成扰乱国际竞争秩序的新型垄断形态。当前,国际竞争法在规制跨境电商算法合谋时,面临管辖权冲突、认定标准操作性不足、国际协同缺失及技术迭代导致的规制滞后等困境,各国规制差异加剧了全球治理的碎片化。本文通过剖析算法合谋的生成机制与表现形式,梳理欧盟、美国、中国等主要经济体的规制实践,聚焦国际规制核心难点,从管辖权协调、认定规则完善、国际协同机制构建、动态规制体系建立四个维度提出针对性规制路径。结合中国跨境电商发展实践,进一步提出完善国内规制体系、参与国际规则制定及推进跨境执法协作等具体策略,以期为全球跨境电商算法合谋的协同治理提供理论参考与实践指引。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of globalization of the digital economy, algorithm technology is deeply embedded in key business operations of cross-border e-commerce, such as pricing, traffic allocation, and advertising bidding, giving rise to algorithmic collusion characterized by cross-border transmission, decentralization, and supply chain coupling effects. This type of conduct transcends the traditional boundaries of monopoly agreements, constituting a new form of monopoly that disrupts the international competitive order. Currently, the regulation of algorithmic collusion by cross-border e-commerce platforms under international competition law faces dilemmas including jurisdictional conflicts, insufficient operability of identification standards, a lack of international coordination, and regulatory lag due to technological iteration. Disparities in regulatory approaches among different countries exacerbate the fragmentation of global governance. This paper analyzes the formation mechanisms and manifestations of algorithmic collusion, reviews the regulatory practices of major economies such as the European Union, the United States, and China, focuses on the core difficulties in international regulation, and proposes targeted regulatory pathways from four dimensions: coordination of jurisdiction, refinement of identification rules, construction of international coordination mechanisms, and establishment of a dynamic regulatory system. Considering China’s cross-border e-commerce development practices, it further proposes specific strategies, including improving the domestic regulatory system, participating in the formulation of international rules, and promoting cross-border enforcement cooperation, aiming to provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for the collaborative governance of algorithmic collusion in global cross-border e-commerce.
文章引用:代蝶蝶. 跨境电商平台算法合谋的国际竞争法规制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(5): 675-682. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.155565

参考文献

[1] 河南国际数字贸易研究院, 全球(郑州)跨境电商研究院. 中国跨境电商发展报告(2024) [R]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2024.
https://www.pishu.com.cn/skwx_ps/bookdetail?ID=15336647&SiteID=14
[2] Ezrachi, A. and Stucke, M.E. (2016) Virtual Competition. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 郭一帆, 郭亚坤. 数字经济时代数据垄断的挑战和规制研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 46(5): 93-100.
[4] 赵泽宇. 数字平台国际反垄断监管冲突下区域贸易协定竞争政策条款之困[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2022, 6(1): 120-140.
[5] 金美蓉, 董艺琳. 经营者集中反垄断域外救济冲突与国际合作机制[J]. 法学家, 2022(2): 133-149+195.
[6] 唐要家, 尹钰锋. 算法合谋的反垄断规制及工具创新研究[J]. 产经评论, 2020, 11(2): 5-16.
[7] 刘建. 跨平台信息推荐中大数据算法的知识产权风险及其保护路径[J]. 新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 53(1): 103-113.
[8] 彭辉. 数据权属的逻辑结构与赋权边界[J]. 比较法研究, 2022(1): 101-115.
[9] 钟晓雯. 从算法“黑箱”走向算法透明[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2023, 34(4): 53-62.
[10] 李墨丝. 跨境电商供应链的竞争法治理[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2024(8): 112-128.
[11] Federal Trade Commission (2019) FTC v. Amazon Marketplace Sellers. Federal Trade Commission.
[12] 崔晓静, 张颖. 数字广告市场的反垄断规制研究[J]. 法商研究, 2024, 41(3): 132-145.
[13] European Commission (2024) Competition Policy for the Digital Age. European Commission.
[14] 吴峻. 欧盟《数字市场法案》对平台算法规制的创新与挑战[J]. 欧洲研究, 2023, 41(5): 89-110+191.
[15] 张吉豫, 吴沈括. 算法透明度的反垄断法建构[J]. 中国法学, 2022(4): 146-164.
[16] 任超. 美国数字平台反垄断立法的新发展及启示[J]. 环球法律评论, 2024, 46(2): 158-176.
[17] 丁茂中. 美国《美国创新与选择在线法》的制度评析[J]. 法商研究, 2023, 40(1): 137-148.
[18] Baker, J. (2021) Algorithmic Competition Policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35, 185-204.
[19] 黄勇, 江山. 平台经济反垄断法研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2023.
[20] 国务院反垄断委员会. 国务院反垄断委员会关于平台经济领域的反垄断指南[Z]. 北京: 国家市场监督管理总局, 2021.
https://www.samr.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/fldj/art/2023/art_0b23a7253cc94eefb469f4b55ecfb251.html, 2026-05-25.
[21] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2023) Digital Economy Report 2023. UNCTAD.
https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/periodicals/26647036
[22] 方新军, 李帅. 算法合谋的反垄断法应对——以平台责任为中心[J]. 中国法学, 2023(2): 136-154.
[23] 贺小勇, 李诗瑶. CPTPP与DEPA数字贸易规则的融合及中国应对[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2024(3): 1-18.