疏降条件下宝塔山砂岩含水层突水风险性评价及排水系统能力校核
Evaluation of Water Inrush Risk in Baotashan Sandstone Aquifer under Drainage Conditions and Check of Drainage System Capacity
摘要: 新上海一号煤矿18煤底板宝塔山砂岩含水层厚度大、水压高,对煤层安全回采构成严重威胁。为评价疏降条件下底板突水危险性并优选疏放水方案,以18煤一分区及首采工作面为研究对象,设计了四种疏放水方案,采用数值模拟方法分析各方案下水位降深规律、突水系数演化特征,并利用大井法预测涌水量,同时结合矿井现有排水系统进行能力复核。结果表明:原始条件下宝塔山砂岩含水层平均突水系数为0.08 MPa/m,超过安全临界值0.06 MPa/m;随着疏放钻孔数量增加,水位降深逐步增大,突水系数小于0.06 MPa/m的安全区域范围不断扩大;四号方案效果最优,但二号方案在保证安全的前提下疏放水量较小、对排水系统压力相对适中。涌水量预测显示,二号方案下矿井正常涌水量增至765 m3/h,最大涌水量859.64 m3/h;现有排水系统中水仓容量及水泵正常排水能力不满足要求,需进行改扩建。综合考虑安全性与经济性,建议优先采用二号方案,并配套实施水仓扩容改造。研究成果可为类似水文地质条件下的深部煤层底板水害防治提供技术参考。
Abstract: The Baotashan Sandstone Aquifer underlying the No. 18 coal seam in the Xinshanghai No. 1 Coal Mine is characterized by large thickness and high water pressure, posing a serious threat to safe coal mining. To evaluate the risk of floor water inrush under depressurization conditions and to optimize the water drainage scheme, the first mining district of the No. 18 coal seam and its initial working face were taken as the research objects. Four drainage schemes were designed. Numerical simulation was adopted to analyze the drawdown patterns and evolution characteristics of the water inrush coefficient under each scheme, and the big well method was used to predict the water inflow. Meanwhile, the capacity of the existing mine drainage system was re-evaluated. The results show that under natural conditions, the average water inrush coefficient of the Baotashan Sandstone Aquifer is 0.08 MPa/m, exceeding the safety threshold of 0.06 MPa/m. With an increasing number of drainage boreholes, the drawdown gradually increases, and the safe area where the water inrush coefficient is below 0.06 MPa/m expands continuously. Scheme 4 achieves the best depressurization effect, but Scheme 2 has a relatively smaller drainage volume while ensuring safety, imposing moderate pressure on the drainage system. The water inflow prediction indicates that under Scheme 2, the normal mine water inflow increases to 765 m3/h, and the maximum water inflow reaches 859.64 m3/h. The existing drainage system does not meet the requirements in terms of sump capacity and normal pumping capacity, necessitating expansion and renovation. Considering both safety and economy, Scheme 2 is recommended as the priority, together with the implementation of sump capacity expansion. The research results can provide technical reference for the prevention and control of floor water hazards in deep coal seams under similar hydrogeological conditions.
文章引用:苏杰, 吕玉广. 疏降条件下宝塔山砂岩含水层突水风险性评价及排水系统能力校核[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(3): 837-855. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.143082

参考文献

[1] 吴金随, 张辞源, 尹尚先, 等. 近20 a我国煤矿水害事故统计及分析[J]. 煤炭技术, 2022, 41(6): 86-89.
[2] 武强, 张志龙, 马积福. 煤层底板突水评价的新型实用方法I——主控指标体系的建设[J]. 煤炭学报, 2007, 32(1): 42-47.
[3] 高延法, 章延平, 张慧敏, 等. 底板突水危险性评价专家系统及应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(2): 253-258.
[4] 李忠建, 魏久传, 郭建斌, 等. 运用突水系数法和模糊聚类法综合评价煤层底板突水危险性[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2010, 37(1): 24-26+90.
[5] 刘钦, 孙亚军, 徐智敏. 改进型突水系数法在矿井底板突水评价中的应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2011, 39(8): 107-109.
[6] 王计堂, 王秀兰. 突水系数法分析预测煤层底板突水危险性的探讨[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2011, 39(7): 106-111.
[7] 武强, 解淑寒, 裴振江, 等. 煤层底板突水评价的新型实用方法III——基于GIS的ANN型脆弱性指数法应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2007, 32(12): 1301-1306.
[8] 武强, 李博, 刘守强, 等. 基于分区变权模型的煤层底板突水脆弱性评价——以开滦蔚州典型矿区为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(9): 1516-1521.
[9] 武强, 王金华, 刘东海, 等. 煤层底板突水评价的新型实用方法IV: 基于GIS的AHP型脆弱性指数法应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2009, 34(2): 233-238.
[10] 武强, 张志龙, 张生元, 等. 煤层底板突水评价的新型实用方法II——脆弱性指数法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2007, 32(11): 1121-1126.
[11] 王连国, 宋扬. 煤层底板突水突变模型[J]. 工程地质学报, 2000, 8(2): 160-163.
[12] 王连国, 宋扬, 缪协兴. 基于尖点突变模型的煤层底板突水预测研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(4): 573-577.
[13] 韦韬, 李博, 王中美, 等. 基于尖点突变模型的煤层底板突水危险性评价[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 35(1): 23-29.
[14] 施龙青, 韩进, 宋扬, 等. 用突水概率指数法预测采场底板突水[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 1999, 28(5): 31-33+49.
[15] 乔伟, 李文平, 赵成喜. 煤矿底板突水评价突水系数-单位涌水量法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(12): 2466-2474.
[16] 王连国, 宋扬. 煤层底板突水组合人工神经网络预测[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2001, 23(4): 502-505.