高速公路货运司机综合信用评价方法研究
Research on a Comprehensive Credit Evaluation Method for Highway Freight Drivers
DOI: 10.12677/ojtt.2026.153034, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 范文东, 石 强, 张 雷, 李 炜:山东高速数智科技有限公司,山东 济南;刘梦茹*, 杨丽平, 刘 凯:山东交通学院交通与物流工程学院,山东 济南
关键词: 高速公路货运司机综合信用评价指标体系AHP-熵权法Highway Freight Drivers Comprehensive Credit Evaluation Indicator System AHP-Entropy Method
摘要: 针对现有司机信用评价维度单一、权重确定主观性强的问题,本文构建了一套面向高速公路运行场景的货运司机综合信用评价指标体系。该体系从信用行为、驾驶行为、风险暴露和稳定出行四个维度选取12项指标,包括事故发生频次、事故多发路段通行占比等。在此基础上,提出一种基于层次分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)与熵权法相结合的组合赋权方法,通过引入群决策一致性约束降低专家主观判断偏差,并利用熵权法反映指标数据差异性特征,从而获得更加合理的指标权重。最后,以山东省某高速公路货运司机数据为例开展实例分析,结果表明,所构建的指标体系能够从多个方面对货运司机综合信用特征进行有效刻画,不同赋权方法在指标权重分布上呈现出明显差异,而组合赋权结果能够有效平衡主观经验与客观数据特征,使指标权重分配更加科学合理。研究成果可为高速公路货运司机信用评价、分级管理及差异化服务提供方法支撑。
Abstract: To address the problems of limited evaluation dimensions and strong subjectivity in weight determination in existing driver credit evaluation methods, this study constructs a comprehensive credit evaluation indicator system for freight drivers from the perspective of highway operation scenarios. The system comprises 12 indicators selected from four dimensions, namely credit behavior, driving behavior, risk exposure, and travel stability, including accident frequency and the proportion of travel through accident-prone road sections. On this basis, a combined weighting method integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the entropy weight method is proposed. By introducing group decision-making consistency constraints, the subjectivity of expert judgments is reduced, while the entropy weight method is employed to reflect the variability of indicator data, thereby yielding more reasonable indicator weights. Finally, a case study based on freight driver data from a highway in Shandong Province is conducted. The results demonstrate that the proposed indicator system can effectively characterize freight drivers’ comprehensive credit features from multiple perspectives, and that different weighting methods exhibit distinct patterns in weight distribution. The combined weighting approach effectively balances subjective experience and objective data characteristics, resulting in a more scientific and rational allocation of indicator weights. The findings provide methodological support for freight driver credit evaluation, hierarchical management, and differentiated service strategies on highways.
文章引用:范文东, 石强, 张雷, 李炜, 刘梦茹, 杨丽平, 刘凯. 高速公路货运司机综合信用评价方法研究[J]. 交通技术, 2026, 15(3): 380-392. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojtt.2026.153034

参考文献

[1] 都珂珂, 黄全生, 张玥. 我国个人信用评估模型综述[J]. 经营与管理, 2021(1): 166-172.
[2] Chen, C.W.S., Dong, M.C., Liu, N. and Sriboonchitta, S. (2019) Inferences of Default Risk and Borrower Characteristics on P2P Lending. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 50, Article ID: 101013.
[3] 魏攀一, 黄建玲, 陈艳艳, 等. 卡车司机对道路忠诚度的评价方法研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2022, 39(S2): 226-235.
[4] 杨洋, 裴童心, 郭丰杰, 等. 基于网络货运平台司机驾驶行为的信用评价体系构建[J]. 物流技术, 2024, 43(6): 119-132.
[5] 徐旖旎. 基于司机信用评价的货运管理系统设计与实现[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2022.
[6] 张华. 基于逻辑回归的驾驶员信用评估研究[J]. 计算机时代, 2023(3): 25-27, 35.
[7] 平怀君. 网络约车驾驶员诚信评价方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2019.
[8] 叶子. 基于信用评价体系的一对多车货匹配研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2021.
[9] 景奇帆. 网络货运经营者视角下实际承运人信用评价体系构建研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2020.
[10] 孙静宇, 陈丹. 基于AHP-熵权法的大学生创新能力评价指标体系研究[J]. 齐鲁工业大学学报, 2025, 39(4): 53-60.
[11] 任泳帆, 荆子安, 王吉康. 基于熵权法与TOPSIS的金融科技企业创新能力综合评价模型研究[J]. 商展经济, 2025(21): 182-186.
[12] 黄承元. 基于熵权法的新能源企业财务评价研究[J]. 中国电子商情, 2025, 31(13): 73-75.
[13] 刘婷, 方琰, 郭伟梁, 等. 高科技中小企业信用评级体系构建研究[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2025(9): 104-112.
[14] 雷皓安. 基于历史通行数据的高速公路逃费行为识别及治理措施研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 华东交通大学, 2025.
[15] 刘利兵. 高速公路假冒绿通车偷逃费行为分析及稽查方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2024.