基于BP神经网络的南丹县滑坡易发性及耦合致灾机制研究
Study on Landslide Susceptibility and Coupled Disaster-Causing Mechanism in Nandan County Based on BP Neural Network
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2026.166083, PDF,   
作者: 陆 晓:桂林理工大学地球科学学院,广西 桂林;罗 恳*:广西华锡矿业有限公司铜坑矿业分公司,广西 河池
关键词: 滑坡易发性BP神经网络耦合致灾机制南丹县Landslide Susceptibility BP Neural Network Coupled Disaster-Causing Mechanism Nandan County
摘要: 针对当前滑坡研究中易发性评价与致灾机制协同不足、难以形成“评价–机理–防控”逻辑闭环的问题,本文以广西南丹县为研究区,选取高程、坡度、地形起伏度、岩性、距断层距离、距河流距离、距道路距离、归一化植被指数、年均降雨量9个评价因子,基于BP神经网络模型开展滑坡易发性高精度评价。从三个方面解析了耦合致灾机制,并识别了关键主控因子。结果表明:南丹县滑坡极高、高易发区面积占比分别为20.6%、27.4%,集中于中低山丘陵过渡带、断裂带沿线、河流岸坡及矿产开采区;坡度 > 25˚、软弱夹层岩性、距断层 < 2 km、年均降雨量 > 1200 mm、距道路 < 1 km为滑坡高发组合条件,五因子叠加区滑坡密度达0.121个/km2;岩性、坡度、年均降雨量、距断层距离、距道路距离为全局主控因子,累计贡献达93.6%。本文研究形成了风险识别–机理解析–靶向防控的一体化思路,可为南丹县滑坡精准防控、矿山生态修复与国土空间规划提供科学支撑。
Abstract: This study focuses on the poor integration of landslide susceptibility assessment and disaster-causing mechanism, which hinders the formation of a complete “assessment‑mechanism‑prevention” system. Taking Nandan County, Guangxi as the study area, a BP neural network was used to evaluate landslide susceptibility using nine factors: elevation, slope, relief, lithology, distance to faults, rivers, roads, NDVI, and annual rainfall. The coupled disaster mechanism was analyzed from three aspects, and key controlling factors were identified. Results show that extremely high‑ and high‑susceptibility zones account for 20.6% and 27.4%, mainly distributed in mountain‑hill transitions, faults, rivers and mining areas. The high‑risk combination includes slope > 25˚, weak lithology, distance to faults < 2 km, rainfall > 1200 mm and distance to roads < 1 km, with a landslide density of 0.121/km2. Lithology, slope, rainfall, distance to faults and roads contribute 93.6% cumulatively. This research establishes an integrated framework and supports landslide prevention, mine restoration and spatial planning in Nandan County.
文章引用:陆晓, 罗恳. 基于BP神经网络的南丹县滑坡易发性及耦合致灾机制研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(6): 916-929. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.166083

参考文献

[1] 杨迁, 王雁林, 马园园. 2001-2019年中国地质灾害分布规律及引发因素分析[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2020, 31(4): 43-48.
[2] 郭飞, 赖鹏, 黄发明, 等. 基于知识图谱的滑坡易发性评价文献综述及研究进展[J]. 地球科学, 2024, 49(5): 1584-1606.
[3] Shano, L., Raghuvanshi, T.K. and Meten, M. (2020) Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation and Hazard Zonation Techniques—A Review. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 7, Article No. 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 张林, 郭郑曦, 齐实, 等. 基于机器学习模型的高植被覆盖区浅层滑坡预测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2024, 40(17): 149-160.
[5] 喜文飞, 成鑫, 杨志全, 等. 基于SBAS-InSAR技术和BP神经网络的高位远程滑坡危险性分析研究[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 49(3): 65-74.
[6] 许强. 对滑坡监测预警相关问题的认识与思考[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28(2): 360-374.
[7] 张茂省, 薛强, 贾俊, 等. 山区城镇地质灾害调查与风险评价方法及实践[J]. 西北地质, 2019, 52(2): 125-135.
[8] Berhane, G., Kebede, M., Alfarah, N., Hagos, E., Grum, B., Giday, A., et al. (2020) Landslide Susceptibility Zonation Mapping Using Gis-Based Frequency Ratio Model with Multi-Class Spatial Data-Sets in the Adwa-Adigrat Mountain Chains, Northern Ethiopia. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 164, Article ID: 103795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 李文彦, 王喜乐. 频率比与信息量模型在黄土沟壑区滑坡易发性评价中的应用与比较[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2020, 29(4): 213-220.
[10] 朱文慧, 邹浩, 何明明, 等. 基于BP神经网络的地质灾害易发性分区方法研究——以蕲春县为例[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2021, 35(6): 840-844.