实时RPV中子剂量测量的共轭探测器响应函数方法研究
An Adjoint Detector Response Function Method for Real-Time RPV Neutron Dosimetry
摘要: 精确的反应堆压力容器辐照评估,对延长反应堆寿命和核电站的长期运行至关重要。每个反应堆压力容器都有其独特的辐照历史,因此需要进行大量的输运计算。传统方法效率低下,无法针对每种运行条件快速重新计算。本文建立了一个实时探测器响应计算框架,称为共轭探测器响应函数(Adjoint Detector Response Function, ADRF)方法。ADRF系数通过结合首次碰撞源(First-Collision Source, FCS)技术进行的一系列共轭计算预先求得。这些系数与ARES系统中的中子源分布进行线性组合。结果表明,ADRF方法在将计算时间缩短几个数量级的同时,其模拟结果与完整输运计算结果的偏差控制在1%左右。该方法为反应堆压力容器的实时剂量测量提供了高保真度的替代方案,为下一代在线监测系统的开发奠定了基础。
Abstract: Accurate irradiation assessment of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) is critical for reactor life extension and the long-term operation of nuclear power plants. Each RPV possesses a unique irradiation history, necessitating a multitude of transport calculations. The inefficiency of traditional methods prevents rapid recalculation for every operating conditions. This paper establishes a real-time detector response calculation framework, referred to as Adjoint Detector Response Function (ADRF) methodology. The ADRF coefficients are pre-calculated through a series of adjoint calculations with the First-Collision Source (FCS) technique. These coefficients are linearly combined with neutron source distributions from the ARES system. Results demonstrate that the ADRF method reproduces full transport results within 2%, while reducing computational time by several orders of magnitude. The methodology provides a high-fidelity alternative for real-time RPV dosimetry, enabling next generation online monitoring systems.
文章引用:陈勇, 张斌. 实时RPV中子剂量测量的共轭探测器响应函数方法研究[J]. 核科学与技术, 2026, 14(3): 153-168. https://doi.org/10.12677/nst.2026.143014

参考文献

[1] Kryukov, A., Debarberis, L., von Estorff, U., Gillemot, F. and Oszvald, F. (2012) Irradiation Embrittlement of Reactor Pressure Vessel Steel at Very High Neutron Fluence. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 422, 173-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Odette, G.R. and Nanstad, R.K. (2009) Predictive Reactor Pressure Vessel Steel Irradiation Embrittlement Models: Issues and Opportunities. JOM, 61, 17-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Blom, F.J. (2007) Reactor Pressure Vessel Embrittlement of NPP Borssele: Design Lifetime and Lifetime Extension. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, 2098-2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] NUREG/CR-2191 (2017) Generic Aging Lessons Learned for Second License Renewal. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[5] Ballesteros, A., Altstadt, E., Gillemot, F., Hein, H., Wagemans, J., Rouden, J., et al. (2014) Monitoring Radiation Embrittlement during Life Extension Periods. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 267, 197-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Kulesza, J.A., Adams, T.R., Armstrong, J.C., Bolding, S.R., Brown, F.B., Bull, J.S. and Zukaitis, A.J. (2022) MCNP® Code Version 6.3.0 Theory & User Manual. Los Alamos National Laboratory.
[7] Zhang, B., Zhang, L., Liu, C. and Chen, Y. (2017) Goal-Oriented Regional Angular Adaptive Algorithm for the SN Equations. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 189, 120-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Yadav, P., Rachamin, R., Konheiser, J. and Baier, S. (2024) Estimation of Weight Window Parameters Based on Recursive Monte Carlo Approach for Reactor Shielding Problems. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 197, Article ID: 110277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Chraïbi, H., Dutfoy, A., Galtier, T. and Garnier, J. (2017) Monte-Carlo Acceleration: Importance Sampling and Hybrid Dynamic Systems. arXiv: 1707.08136.
[10] Adams, M.L. and Larsen, E.W. (2002) Fast Iterative Methods for Discrete-Ordinates Particle Transport Calculations. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 40, 3-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Baker, R.S. (2002) A Block Adaptive Mesh Refinement Algorithm for the Neutral Particle Transport Equation. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 141, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Hu, J., Zhang, B., Dai, N., Liu, C. and Chen, Y. (2021) Optimization Algorithms Based on Contribution Theory for Broad-Group Energy Structures in Shielding Calculation. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 186, Article ID: 109547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Wagner, J.C., Peplow, D.E. and Mosher, S.W. (2014) FW-CADIS Method for Global and Regional Variance Reduction of Monte Carlo Radiation Transport Calculations. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 176, 37-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Wagner, J.C., Peplow, D.E., Mosher, S.W. and Evans, T.M. (2011) Review of Hybrid (Deterministic/Monte Carlo) Radiation Transport Methods, Codes, and Applications at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology, 2, 808-814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Haghighat, A., Royston, K. and Walters, W. (2016) MRT Methodologies for Real-Time Simulation of Nonproliferation and Safeguards Problems. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 87, 61-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Zheng, Y., Zhang, B., Chen, M., Zhang, L., Cao, B., Chen, Y., et al. (2016) Application of the First Collision Source Method to CSNS Target Station Shielding Calculation. Chinese Physics C, 40, Article ID: 046201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Zhang, P., Zhang, B. and Chen, Y. (2024) Core Neutron Source Generation Method for Nuclear Reactor Shielding Calculation. Nuclear Techniques, 46, Article ID: 050603.
[18] Lathrop, K.D. (1968) Ray Effects in Discrete Ordinates Equations. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 32, 357-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Zhang, L., Zhang, B., Liu, C. and Chen, Y. (2019) Numerical Analysis of Spatial Discretization Schemes in ARES Transport Code for Shielding Calculation. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 110, 236-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Chadwick, M.B., Herman, M., Obložinský, P., Dunn, M.E., Danon, Y., Kahler, A.C., et al. (2011) ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data. Nuclear Data Sheets, 112, 2887-2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Remec, I. and Kam, F.B. (1998) H.B. Robinson-2 Pressure Vessel Benchmark. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.