热工水力程序输入模型兼容性与转换方法研究
Study on Input Model Compatibility and Conversion Methods for Thermal-Hydraulic System Codes
摘要: 热工水力系统分析程序的验证与确认已形成较为完善的国际合作项目和试验数据支撑。然而,对于新开发的程序,仍需依据其输入规范重新开展大量的建模与校核工作。为提高复杂系统输入模型的建模与复用效率,本文针对程序间输入模型兼容性问题,构建了程序间输入模型转换框架与一致化建模技术路径。选取我国大型非能动压水堆为研究对象,以代表性的RELAP5至TRACE程序转换为实例,系统阐述了程序间输入模型的转换、迭代修正与交叉验证流程。典型工况的预测对比结果表明,转换后的模型能够再现事故主要瞬态过程及关键热工水力现象,两程序关键输出参数的变化趋势总体一致,模型转换框架具备可行性。研究表明,在程序研发与验证阶段引入输入模型兼容、转换与复用机制,能够减少重复建模与校核工作量,为程序间交叉验证和偏差溯源提供技术基础。本文工作可为后续同类堆型的输入模型转换、程序间交叉验证和自主化热工水力系统分析程序的开发与验证提供参考。
Abstract: Verification and validation of thermal-hydraulic system codes have been supported by relatively mature international collaborative projects and experimental databases. However, for newly developed codes, extensive modeling and consistency-checking efforts still need to be repeated according to their specific input specifications. To improve the efficiency of constructing and reusing complex system input models, this study addresses the compatibility problem of input models among different codes and establishes an inter-code input model conversion framework and a consistent modeling workflow. A large passive pressurized water reactor in China is selected as the research object, and a representative RELAP5-to-TRACE conversion is employed as an example to systematically describe the conversion, iterative correction, and cross-verification process of inter-code input models. Comparative predictions under typical conditions show that the converted model can reproduce the major accident transient processes and key thermal-hydraulic phenomena, while the key output parameters predicted by the two codes exhibit generally consistent trends, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed model conversion framework. The results indicate that introducing input model compatibility, conversion, and reuse mechanisms into code development and validation can reduce repetitive modeling and consistency-checking efforts, and provide a technical basis for cross-code verification and deviation source identification. This work can provide a reference for subsequent input model conversion of similar reactor types, cross-code verification, and the development and validation of indigenous thermal-hydraulic system codes.
文章引用:王文轩, 胡梦岩, 杨军. 热工水力程序输入模型兼容性与转换方法研究[J]. 核科学与技术, 2026, 14(3): 180-192. https://doi.org/10.12677/nst.2026.143016

参考文献

[1] Deng, J., Ding, S., Li, Z., Huang, T., Wu, D., Wang, J., et al. (2021) The Development of ARSAC for Modeling Nuclear Power Plant System. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 140, Article ID: 103880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 葛炜, 杨燕华, 刘飒, 等. 大型先进压水堆核电站关键设计软件自主化与COSINE软件包研发[J]. 中国能源, 2016, 38(7): 39-44.
[3] 徐财红, 袁红胜, 柳焕楠, 等. 两流体双压力热工水力系统分析软件LOCUST 2.0架构设计[J]. 核动力工程, 2023, 44(6): 86-94.
[4] 国家核安全局. HAF102-2016核动力厂设计安全规定[S]. 北京: 国家核安全局, 2016.
[5] 国家核安全局. HAD102/18-2017核动力厂安全分析用计算机软件开发与应用(试行) [S]. 北京: 国家核安全局, 2017.
[6] Deng, C., Zhang, X., Yang, Y. and Yang, J. (2019) Research on Scaling Design and Applicability Evaluation of Integral Thermal-Hydraulic Test Facilities: A Review. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 131, 273-290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 黄茜, 胡梦岩, 彭翠婷, 等. 反应堆热工水力验证性数据库的建设与展望[J]. 核科学与工程, 2024, 44(2): 274-285.
[8] Hu, M., Deng, C., Yu, S., Zhang, X. and Yang, J. (2025) The Applications and Prospects of BEPU Methodology in Generation III Nuclear Reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 442, Article ID: 114205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Applied Programming Technology, Inc. (2011) Symbolic Nuclear Analysis Package (SNAP) User’s Manual. Applied Programming Technology, Inc.
[10] Prošek, A., Berar, O.A. and Mavko, B. (2012) IJS Procedure for Converting Input Deck from RELAP5 to TRACE. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[11] Berar, O.A., Prošek, A. and Mavko, B. (2013) RELAP5 and TRACE Assessment of the Achilles Natural Reflood Experiment. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 261, 306-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Prošek, A. and Berar, O.A. (2012) Advanced Presentation of BETHSY 6.2TC Test Results Calculated by RELAP5 and TRACE. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2012, Article ID: 812130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Prošek, A. (2025) TRACE Simulations of LOCAs Together with the Complete Loss of One Emergency Core Cooling Function in Two-Loop PWR. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[14] Zheng, M., Yan, J., Jun, S., Tian, L., Wang, X. and Qiu, Z. (2016) The General Design and Technology Innovations of CAP1400. Engineering, 2, 97-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 郑明光, 严锦泉. 大型先进非能动压水堆CAP1400[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2018.
[16] Li, Y.Q., Chang, H.J., Ye, Z.S., Fang, F.F., Shi, Y., Yang, K., et al. (2016) Analyses of ACME Integral Test Results on CAP1400 Small-Break Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Transient. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 88, 375-397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Deng, C., Chen, L., Yang, J. and Wu, Q. (2019) Best-estimate Calculation Plus Uncertainty Analysis of SBLOCA Transient for the Scale-Down Passive Test Facility. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 112, 191-201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2015) TRACE V5.0 Assessment Manual: Main Report. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[19] Information Systems Laboratories, Inc. (2006) RELAP5/MOD3.3 Code Manual, Volume I: Code Structure, System Models, and Solution Methods. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[20] Information Systems Laboratories, Inc. (2006) RELAP5/MOD3.3 Code Manual, Volume IV: Models and Correlations. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[21] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2015) TRACE V5.0 Theory Manual: Field Equations, Solution Methods, and Physical Models. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[22] 张雪艳, 杨军, 王诗琦, 等. 国际标准题51“公开测试”阶段进展及分析[J]. 核动力工程, 2022, 43(6): 15-23.