高强度甜味剂多系统效应的斑马鱼证据
Multisystem Effects of High-Intensity Sweeteners: Evidence from Zebrafish
DOI: 10.12677/hjfns.2026.156065, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 翟兆东:内蒙古大学生物医学研究院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 高强度甜味剂;斑马鱼;肠道菌群;糖脂代谢;食品安全;High-Intensity Sweeteners; Zebrafish; Gut Microbiota; Glucose and Lipid Metabolism; Food Safety
摘要: 高强度甜味剂因甜度高、添加量低,广泛用于减糖食品。近年来,除传统毒理学终点外,其对肠道屏障、微生物群、糖脂代谢及神经行为的潜在影响受到关注。斑马鱼具有发育快、幼体透明、易于高通量成像和多系统终点整合等特点,已用于糖精、阿斯巴甜、安赛蜜、三氯蔗糖和纽甜等甜味剂的生物效应研究。现有证据显示,不同甜味剂具有明显的分子特异性:安赛蜜和纽甜在特定暴露条件下可引起肠道屏障与炎症改变,部分甜味剂还伴随菌群功能、糖脂代谢、氧化应激及神经行为变化。本文以斑马鱼研究为主线,结合哺乳动物和微生物证据,梳理肠道稳态、菌群代谢、肠–肝轴和肠–脑轴的可能联系。总体上,斑马鱼适合用于高强度甜味剂的多终点筛查与机制筛选,但其结果不能直接外推为人体健康风险,仍需结合实际膳食暴露、毒代动力学及因果干预研究综合判断。
Abstract: High-intensity sweeteners are widely used in sugar-reduced foods because they provide intense sweetness at low addition levels. Beyond conventional toxicological endpoints, increasing attention has focused on their potential effects on intestinal barrier function, gut microbiota, glucose and lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, and neurobehavior. Zebrafish, with rapid development, transparent larvae, high-throughput imaging, and integrated multisystem endpoints, have been used to evaluate saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, neotame, and related sweeteners. Available evidence indicates compound-specific effects: under defined exposure conditions, acesulfame potassium and neotame can alter intestinal barrier and inflammatory phenotypes, while several sweeteners are associated with changes in microbial function, metabolic homeostasis, and neurobehavior. This review summarizes zebrafish evidence on intestinal homeostasis, microbial metabolism, and potential gut-liver and gut-brain interactions, supplemented by selected mammalian and microbial studies. Zebrafish are useful for multi-endpoint and mechanistic screening, but their findings should not be directly interpreted as evidence of human health risk without considering dietary exposure, toxicokinetics, and causal intervention studies.
文章引用:翟兆东. 高强度甜味剂多系统效应的斑马鱼证据[J]. 食品与营养科学, 2026, 15(6): 621-632. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjfns.2026.156065

参考文献

[1] World Health Organization (2023) Use of Non-Sugar Sweeteners: WHO Guideline. World Health Organization.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240073616
[2] GB 2760-2024食品安全国家标准 食品添加剂使用标准[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2024.
[3] Sun, Y. and Xu, B. (2025) A Critical Review on Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 105, 2737-2747.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.14148
[4] Feng, J., Peng, J., Hsiao, Y., Liu, C., Yang, Y., Zhao, H., et al. (2024) Non/Low-Caloric Artificial Sweeteners and Gut Microbiome: From Perturbed Species to Mechanisms. Metabolites, 14, Article 544.
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14100544
[5] Zhai, Z., Zhang, Y., Liang, X., Li, J., Chen, Z., Zhang, J., et al. (2024) Acesulfame Potassium Triggers Inflammatory Bowel Disease via the Inhibition of Focal Adhesion Pathway. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 476, Article 134901.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134901
[6] Liu, X., Wang, Q., Lv, H., Mu, B., Zhou, Y., Li, X., et al. (2026) Artificial Sweetener Acesulfame Induces Oxidative Stress, Neurotoxicity, and Glycolipid Metabolic Disruption in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Pollution, 397, Article 127951.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.127951
[7] Jin, X., Zhang, L., Yang, J., Cao, Y., Dai, Z., Ge, X., et al. (2026) Newer High-Intensity Artificial Sweeteners Reduce Bacterial Susceptibility to Ampicillin and Induce Intestinal Inflammation in Zebrafish. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 511, Article 142123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.142123
[8] Zhong, X., Li, J., Lu, F., Zhang, J. and Guo, L. (2022) Application of Zebrafish in the Study of the Gut Microbiome. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 5, 323-336.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.12227
[9] Garibay-Valdez, E., Olivas-Bernal, C.A., Vargas-Albores, F., Martínez-Porchas, M., García-Godínez, D.M., Medina-Félix, D., et al. (2024) Deciphering the Gut Microbiota of Zebrafish, the Most Used Fish as a Biological Model: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 297, Article 111713.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.111713
[10] Jia, P.P., Junaid, M., Wen, P.P., et al. (2021) Role of Germ-Free Animal Models in Understanding Interactions between Gut Microbiota and Host. Environmental Pollution, 279, Article 116925.
[11] Saputra, F., Lai, Y.H., Fernandez, R.A.T., et al. (2021) Acute and Sub-Chronic Exposure to Artificial Sweeteners at the Highest Environmentally Relevant Concentration Induce Less Cardiovascular Physiology Alterations in Zebrafish Larvae. Biology, 10, Article 548.
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060548
[12] EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) (2025) Re-Evaluation of Neotame (E 961) as Food Additive. EFSA Journal, 23, e9480.
[13] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026) Aspartame and Other Sweeteners in Food.
https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/aspartame-and-other-sweeteners-food
[14] Shil, A., Ladeira Faria, L.M., Walker, C.A. and Chichger, H. (2024) The Artificial Sweetener Neotame Negatively Regulates the Intestinal Epithelium Directly through T1R3-Signaling and Indirectly through Pathogenic Changes to Model Gut Bacteria. Frontiers in Nutrition, 11, Article 1366409.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1366409
[15] Dong, G., Li, X., Han, G., Du, L. and Li, M. (2020) Zebrafish Neuro-Behavioral Profiles Altered by Acesulfame (ACE) within the Range of “No Observed Effect Concentrations (NOECS)”. Chemosphere, 243, Article 125431.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125431
[16] Han, G., Li, X., Dong, G., Zhang, L., Gao, J., Li, M., et al. (2021) Phenotyping Aquatic Neurotoxicity Induced by the Artificial Sweetener Saccharin at Sublethal Concentration Levels. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 69, 2041-2050.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05872
[17] Li, X., Dong, G., Han, G., Du, L. and Li, M. (2021) Zebrafish Behavioral Phenomics Links Artificial Sweetener Aspartame to Behavioral Toxicity and Neurotransmitter Homeostasis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 69, 15393-15402.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06077
[18] Christy, L.D., Vignesh, K., Nellore, J. and Tippabathani, J. (2024) Impact of Food Additives on Neurodevelopmental Processes in Zebrafish (Danio rerio): Exploring Circadian Clock Genes and Dopamine System. Developmental Neurobiology, 84, 191-202.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22947
[19] Colín-García, K., Elizalde-Velázquez, G.A., Gómez-Oliván, L.M., Islas-Flores, H., García-Medina, S. and Galar-Martínez, M. (2022) Acute Exposure to Environmentally Relevant Concentrations of Sucralose Disrupts Embryonic Development and Leads to an Oxidative Stress Response in Danio Rerio. Science of the Total Environment, 829, Article 154689.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154689
[20] Colín-García, K., Elizalde-Velázquez, G.A., Gómez-Oliván, L.M. and García-Medina, S. (2023) Influence of Sucralose, Acesulfame-K, and Their Mixture on Brain’s Fish: A Study of Behavior, Oxidative Damage, and Acetylcholinesterase Activity in Danio rerio. Chemosphere, 340, Article 139928.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139928
[21] Harika, R., Vasantharekha, R., Reddy, S.S., Chauhan, A., Achudhan, A.B., Suresh, A., et al. (2025) Sweetener Synapse: Exploring Non-Nutritive Sweeteners’ Role in Zebrafish Glucose Homeostasis. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 39, Article 104322.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104322
[22] Gugescu, L., Yang, Y., Kool, J.F., Fyhrquist, N., Wincent, E. and Alenius, H. (2025) Microbiota Modulates Compound-Specific Toxicity of Environmental Chemicals: A Multi-Omics Analysis in Zebrafish Embryos. Environment International, 204, Article 109828.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109828
[23] Turner, J.R. (2009) Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Function in Health and Disease. Nature Reviews Immunology, 9, 799-809.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2653
[24] Hanawa, Y., Higashiyama, M., Kurihara, C., Tanemoto, R., Ito, S., Mizoguchi, A., et al. (2021) Acesulfame Potassium Induces Dysbiosis and Intestinal Injury with Enhanced Lymphocyte Migration to Intestinal Mucosa. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 36, 3140-3148.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15654
[25] Jang, H.J., Kokrashvili, Z., Theodorakis, M.J., Carlson, O.D., Kim, B., Zhou, J., et al. (2007) Gut-Expressed Gustducin and Taste Receptors Regulate Secretion of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15069-15074.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706890104
[26] Suez, J., Korem, T., Zeevi, D., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Thaiss, C.A., Maza, O., et al. (2014) Artificial Sweeteners Induce Glucose Intolerance by Altering the Gut Microbiota. Nature, 514, 181-186.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13793
[27] Suez, J., Cohen, Y., Valdés-Mas, R., Mor, U., Dori-Bachash, M., Federici, S., et al. (2022) Personalized Microbiome-Driven Effects of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on Human Glucose Tolerance. Cell, 185, 3307-3328.e19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.07.016
[28] Gauthier, E., Milagro, F.I. and Navas-Carretero, S. (2024) Effect of Low-and Non-Calorie Sweeteners on the Gut Microbiota: A Review of Clinical Trials and Cross-Sectional Studies. Nutrition, 117, Article 112237.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2023.112237
[29] Chi, L., Bian, X., Gao, B., Tu, P., Lai, Y., Ru, H., et al. (2018) Effects of the Artificial Sweetener Neotame on the Gut Microbiome and Fecal Metabolites in Mice. Molecules, 23, Article 367.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020367
[30] Bian, X., Chi, L., Gao, B., Tu, P., Ru, H. and Lu, K. (2017) The Artificial Sweetener Acesulfame Potassium Affects the Gut Microbiome and Body Weight Gain in CD-1 Mice. PLOS ONE, 12, e0178426.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178426
[31] Hosseini, A., Barlow, G.M., Leite, G., Rashid, M., Parodi, G., Wang, J., et al. (2023) Consuming Artificial Sweeteners May Alter the Structure and Function of Duodenal Microbial Communities. iScience, 26, Article 108530.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108530
[32] Mann, E.R., Lam, Y.K. and Uhlig, H.H. (2024) Short-Chain Fatty Acids: Linking Diet, the Microbiome and Immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology, 24, 577-595.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-024-01014-8
[33] Zhang, H., Xie, Y., Cao, F. and Song, X. (2024) Gut Microbiota-Derived Fatty Acid and Sterol Metabolites: Biotransformation and Immunomodulatory Functions. Gut Microbes, 16, Article 2382336.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2024.2382336
[34] Collins, S.L., Stine, J.G., Bisanz, J.E., Okafor, C.D. and Patterson, A.D. (2023) Bile Acids and the Gut Microbiota: Metabolic Interactions and Impacts on Disease. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 21, 236-247.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00805-x
[35] Chi, L., Yang, Y.F., Bian, X., Gao, B., Tu, P., Ru, H., et al. (2024) Chronic Sucralose Consumption Inhibits Farnesoid X Receptor Signaling and Perturbs Lipid and Cholesterol Homeostasis in the Mouse Livers, Potentially by Altering Gut Microbiota Functions. Science of the Total Environment, 919, Article 169603.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169603
[36] Ahmad, S.Y., Friel, J.K. and MacKay, D.S. (2020) The Effect of the Artificial Sweeteners on Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Trial. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 45, 606-612.
https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2019-0359
[37] Méndez-García, L.A., Bueno-Hernández, N., Cid-Soto, M.A., De León, K.L., Mendoza-Martínez, V.M., Espinosa-Flores, A.J., et al. (2022) Ten-Week Sucralose Consumption Induces Gut Dysbiosis and Altered Glucose and Insulin Levels in Healthy Young Adults. Microorganisms, 10, Article 434.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020434
[38] Nelson, J.C. and Granato, M. (2022) Zebrafish Behavior as a Gateway to Nervous System Assembly and Plasticity. Development, 149, dev177998.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.177998
[39] Mei, C.H., Li, W.X., Zhao, B.C., et al. (2025) Short‐Chain Fatty Acids Mediate Gut Microbiota-Brain Communication and Protect the Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1545, 116-131.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15299
[40] Zhang, C., Zhang, X., Qiu, H., Song, Q., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., et al. (2025) Fermented Gastrodia Elata Bl. Intervenes Gut Microbiota and Amino Acid Metabolism in Zebrafish to Promote 5-HT Homeostasis against Sleep Disturbances. Food Research International, 217, Article 116757.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116757