基于人工智能与计算化学的多维度靶向药物虚拟筛选
A Multi-Dimensional Virtual Screening for Targeted Drugs Based on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Chemistry
摘要: 现代药物的研发存在着周期长、成本大、传统的高通量筛选成功率低等诸多问题。为了快速找到高效低毒靶向药物(抗肿瘤微管抑制剂)的候选物,本文从人工智能、计算化学两方面来综合论述虚拟筛选的方法。该计算管线以生物活性数据库为基础,用机器学习分类预测模型建立基于配体的预测体系,并采用SHAP归因分析破解算法“黑箱”方式来解释结果,给药物微观构效关系赋予了直观的物理指引。其次使用核心药效团模型和SMARTS规则对千万级的商业化化合物库做骨架硬编码筛选,可以快速缩减化学空间。接着利用基于受体的半柔性三维分子对接技术来确定候选小分子和受体蛋白空腔的构象契合程度以及结合自由能。最终使用无监督结构聚类技术来规避结构风险,同时配合ADMET早期预测,从中筛选出有较高靶点亲和力以及较好的临床转化前景的先导化合物。这样一种漏斗式高效的集成计算管线,很好地克服了传统研发的盲目性,给精准药物设计提供了一个可靠的数字化闭环方案。
Abstract: Current problems in the development of new drugs include a long cycle, high cost and a low success rate for traditional high-throughput screening. To accelerate the discovery of candidates for high-efficiency and low-toxicity targeted drugs (anti-tumor microtubule inhibitors), this paper introduces a multi-dimensional virtual screening strategy based on artificial intelligence and computational chemistry. First, the computational pipeline builds ligand-based machine learning classification models using bioactivity databases, and then applies SHAP attribution analysis to interpret the “black box” of the algorithm and provide intuitive physical guidance for microscopic structure-activity relationships. Second, it uses core pharmacophore models and SMARTS rules to perform hard-coded scaffold filtering on commercial compound libraries containing tens of millions of compounds and achieve a rapid reduction of chemical space. Next, receptor-based semi-flexible three-dimensional molecular docking technology is employed to determine the degree of conformational fit between candidate small molecules and the receptor protein cavity and calculate the binding free energy. Finally, unsupervised structural clustering technology is employed to mitigate structural risks; in conjunction with early ADMET prediction, high-affinity target-binding lead compounds with good clinical translation potential are carefully selected. This high-efficiency funnel-shaped integrated computational pipeline can effectively solve the problem of blindness in traditional R&D and provide a reliable digital closed-loop solution for precision drug design.
文章引用:崔韵婕, 陈涵, 刘婉鑫, 权贞熙, 符一诺, 王爽悦, 冬海洋. 基于人工智能与计算化学的多维度靶向药物虚拟筛选[J]. 药物化学, 2026, 14(4): 287-293. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjmce.2026.144028

参考文献

[1] Vamathevan, J., Clark, D., Czodrowski, P., Dunham, I., Ferran, E., Lee, G., et al. (2019) Applications of Machine Learning in Drug Discovery and Development. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 18, 463-477.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5
[2] McLoughlin, E.C. and O’Boyle, N.M. (2020) Colchicine Binding Site Inhibitors from Chemistry to Clinic: A Review. Pharmaceuticals, 13, Article No. 8.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13010008
[3] Sargsyan, A., Sahakyan, H. and Nazaryan, K. (2023) Effect of Colchicine Binding Site Inhibitors on the Tubulin Intersubunit Interaction. ACS Omega, 8, 29448-29454.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02979
[4] Ekins, S., Puhl, A.C., Zorn, K.M., Lane, T.R., Russo, D.P., Klein, J.J., et al. (2019) Exploiting Machine Learning for End-to-End Drug Discovery and Development. Nature Materials, 18, 435-441.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0338-z
[5] Macalino, S.J.Y., Gosu, V., Hong, S. and Choi, S. (2015) Role of Computer-Aided Drug Design in Modern Drug Discovery. Archives of Pharmacal Research, 38, 1686-1701.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5
[6] Shoichet, B.K. (2004) Virtual Screening of Chemical Libraries. Nature, 432, 862-865.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03197
[7] Sliwoski, G., Kothiwale, S., Meiler, J. and Lowe, E.W. (2014) Computational Methods in Drug Discovery. Pharmacological Reviews, 66, 334-395.
https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007336
[8] Patel, L., Shukla, T., Huang, X., Ussery, D.W. and Wang, S. (2020) Machine Learning Methods in Drug Discovery. Molecules, 25, Article 5277.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225277
[9] Lavecchia, A. (2015) Machine-Learning Approaches in Drug Discovery: Methods and Applications. Drug Discovery Today, 20, 318-331.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.012
[10] Carpenter, K.A. and Huang, X. (2018) Machine Learning-Based Virtual Screening and Its Applications to Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery: A Review. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 24, 3347-3358.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612824666180607124038
[11] Liu, T., Lin, Y., Wen, X., Jorissen, R.N. and Gilson, M.K. (2007) Bindingdb: A Web-Accessible Database of Experimentally Determined Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D198-D201.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl999
[12] Gaulton, A., Bellis, L.J., Bento, A.P., Chambers, J., Davies, M., Hersey, A., et al. (2011) ChEMBL: A Large-Scale Bioactivity Database for Drug Discovery. Nucleic Acids Research, 40, D1100-D1107.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr777
[13] Yang, X., Wang, Y., Byrne, R., Schneider, G. and Yang, S. (2019) Concepts of Artificial Intelligence for Computer-Assisted Drug Discovery. Chemical Reviews, 119, 10520-10594.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00728
[14] Lo, Y., Rensi, S.E., Torng, W. and Altman, R.B. (2018) Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics and Drug Discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 23, 1538-1546.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.010
[15] Dara, S., Dhamercherla, S., Jadav, S.S., Babu, C.M. and Ahsan, M.J. (2022) Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 1947-1999.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10058-4
[16] Rogers, D. and Hahn, M. (2010) Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 50, 742-754.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100050t
[17] Morgan, H.L. (1965) The Generation of a Unique Machine Description for Chemical Structures—A Technique Developed at Chemical Abstracts Service. Journal of Chemical Documentation, 5, 107-113.
https://doi.org/10.1021/c160017a018
[18] Axen, S.D., Huang, X., Cáceres, E.L., Gendelev, L., Roth, B.L. and Keiser, M.J. (2017) A Simple Representation of Three-Dimensional Molecular Structure. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 60, 7393-7409.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00696
[19] Biau, G. (2012) Analysis of a Random Forest Model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 1063-1095.
[20] Geurts, P., Ernst, D. and Wehenkel, L. (2006) Extremely Randomized Trees. Machine Learning, 63, 3-42.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1
[21] Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. (2016) XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, 13-17 August 2016, 785-794.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
[22] Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., et al. (2017) LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, 4-9 December 2017, 3149-3157.
[23] Wu, J., Kong, L., Yi, M., Chen, Q., Cheng, Z., Zuo, H., et al. (2022) Prediction and Screening Model for Products Based on Fusion Regression and XGBoost Classification. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article ID: 4987639.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4987639
[24] Lundberg, S.M. and Lee, S.I. (2017) A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, 4-9 December 2017, 4768-4777.
[25] Wojtuch, A., Jankowski, R. and Podlewska, S. (2021) How Can SHAP Values Help to Shape Metabolic Stability of Chemical Compounds? Journal of Cheminformatics, 13, Article No. 74.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00542-y
[26] Bernal, L., et al. (2023) Improving Machine Learning Classification Predictions through Interpretability. Molecules, 28, 1-15.
[27] Irwin, J.J. and Shoichet, B.K. (2005) ZINC—A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 45, 177-182.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci049714+
[28] Wang, J., Miller, D.D. and Li, W. (2022) Molecular Interactions at the Colchicine Binding Site in Tubulin: An X-Ray Crystallography Perspective. Drug Discovery Today, 27, 759-776.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.12.001
[29] Wójcikowski, M., Zielenkiewicz, P. and Siedlecki, P. (2015) Open Drug Discovery Toolkit (ODDT): A New Open-Source Player in the Drug Discovery Field. Journal of Cheminformatics, 7, Article No. 26.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0078-2
[30] Muegge, I. and Oloff, S. (2006) Advances in Virtual Screening. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 3, 405-411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2006.12.002
[31] Trott, O. and Olson, A.J. (2009) AutoDock Vina: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Docking with a New Scoring Function, Efficient Optimization, and Multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31, 455-461.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334
[32] Lipinski, C.A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B.W. and Feeney, P.J. (2001) Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 46, 3-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0
[33] Butina, D. (1999) Unsupervised Data Base Clustering Based on Daylight’s Fingerprint and Tanimoto Similarity: A Fast and Automated Way to Cluster Small and Large Data Sets. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 39, 747-750.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci9803381
[34] Daina, A., Michielin, O. and Zoete, V. (2017) SwissADME: A Free Web Tool to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Drug-Likeness and Medicinal Chemistry Friendliness of Small Molecules. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 42717.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42717
[35] Eberhardt, J., Santos-Martins, D., Tillack, A.F. and Forli, S. (2021) Autodock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 61, 3891-3898.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203