|
[1]
|
Voelckner, F. (2006) An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 17, 137-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-5147-x [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Adamowicz, W., Louviere J. and Williams, M. (1994) Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271-292.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1017 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Ready, R.C., Champ, P.A. and Lawton, J.L. (2010) Using res-pondent uncertainty to mitigate hypothetical bias in a stated choice experiment. Land Economics, 86, 363-381.
|
|
[4]
|
Voltaire, L., Pirrone, C. and Bailly, D. (2013) Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent wil-lingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach. Ecological Economics, 88, 76-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.009 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
Li, C. and Mattson, L. (1995) Discrete choice under prefe-rence uncertainty: An improved structural model for contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 256-269.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1017 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Akter, S., Bennett, J. and Akhter, S. (2008) Preference uncertainty in contingent valuation. Ecological Economics, 67, 345-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.009 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Akter, S., Brouwer, R. and Brander, L. (2009) Beukering P. V. Respondent uncertainty in a contingent market for carbon offsets. Ecological Economics, 68, 1858-1863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.013 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Loomis, J. and Ekstrand, E. (1998) Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: The case of the Mexican Spotted Owl. Ecological Economics, 27, 29-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00126-2 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
Shaikh, S. L., Sun, L. and van Kooten, G.C. (2007) Treating respondent uncertainly in contingent valuation: A comparison of empirical treatments. Ecological Economics, 62, 115-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.016 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
Martínez-Espiňeira, R. and Lyssenko, N. (2012) Alternative approaches to dealing with respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: A comparative analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 93, 130-139.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.008 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[11]
|
Hanley, N., Kriström, B. and Shogren, J.F. (2009) Coherent arbitrariness: On value uncertainty for environmental goods. Land Economics, 85, 41-50.
|
|
[12]
|
Champ, P.A. and Bishop, R.G. (2001) Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19, 383-402.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011604818385 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
Voltaire, L., Pirrone, C. and Bailly, D. (2013) Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach. Ecological Economics, 88, 76-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.009 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
Alberini, A., Boyle, K. and Welsh, M. (2003) Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 40- 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00010-4 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
Wang, H. (1997) Treatment of “don’t know” responses in contingent valuation surveys: A random valuation model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 219-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0965 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[16]
|
Spash, C.L. and Hanley, N. (1995) Preference, informa-tion and biodiversity preservation. Economics, 62, 115-125.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)00056-2 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[17]
|
van Kooten, G.C., Krcmar, E. and Bulte, E. (2001) Prefe-rence uncertainty in non-market valuation: A fuzzy approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 487-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00172 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[18]
|
Petrolia, D.R. and Kim, T.G. (2011) Contingent valuation with heterogeneous reasons for uncertainty. Resource and Energy Economics, 33, 515-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.10.001 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[19]
|
Champ, P.A., Bishop, R.G., Brown, T.C. and McCollum, D.W. (1997) Using donation mechanisms to value non-use benefits from public goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33, 151-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1997.0988 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[20]
|
Norwood, F.B. (2005) Can calibration reconcile stated and observed preferences? Journal of Agricultural Applied Economics, 37, 237-248.
|
|
[21]
|
Blumenschein, K., Johannesson, M., Blomuist, G.C., Liljas, B. and O’Conor, R.M. (1998) Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Southern Economic Journal, 65, 169-177.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1061360 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[22]
|
Moore, R., Bishop, R.C., Provencher, B. and Champ, P.A. (2010) Ac-counting for respondent uncertainty to improve willingness-to-pay estimates. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Eco-nomics, 58, 381-401.
|
|
[23]
|
Ready, R.C., Whitehead, J. and Blomquist, G. (1995) Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 181-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1040 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[24]
|
Blamey, R.K., Bennett, J.W. and Morrison, M.D. (1999) Yea-saying in contingent valuation surveys. Land Economics, 75, 126-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146997 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[25]
|
Whitehead, J.C., Huang, J.C., Blogmquist, G.C. and Ready, R.C. (1998) Construct validity of dichotomous and polychotomous contingent valuation questions. Environment and Resource Economics, 11, 107-116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008231430184 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[26]
|
Ready, R.C., Navrud, S. and Dubourg, W.R. (2001) How do respondents with uncertain willingness to pay answer contingent valuation questions. Land Economics, 77, 315-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3147126 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[27]
|
Akter, S. and Bennett, J. (2013) Preference uncertainty in stated preference studies: Facts and artefacts. Applied Economics, 45, 2107-2115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2012.654914 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[28]
|
McFadden, D. (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualit-ative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P., Ed., Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, 105-142.
|
|
[29]
|
Hanemann, W.M. (1984) Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation experiments in discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 1057-1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1240800 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[30]
|
Sun, L. and van Kooten, G.C. (2009) Comparing fuzzy and probabilistic approaches to preference uncertainty in non- market valu-ation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42, 471-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9219-7 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[31]
|
Wang, T., Venkates, R. and Chatterjee, R. (2007) Reservation price as a range: An incentive compatible measurement approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 200-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.200 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[32]
|
Chang, J., Yoo, S. and Kwak, S. (2007) An investigation of prefe-rence uncertainty in the contingent valuation study. Applied Economics Letter, 14, 691-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504850600592713 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[33]
|
Blomquist, G.C., Blumenschein, K. and Johannesson, M. (2009) Eliciting willingness to pay without bias using follow-up certainty statements: Comparison between Proba-bly/Definitely and a 10-point certainty scale. Environmental and Resource Economics, 43, 473-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9242-8 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[34]
|
Samnaliev, M., Stevens, T.H. and More, T. (2006) A compar-ison of alternative certainty calibration techniques in contingent valuation. Ecological Economics, 57, 507-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.017 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|