|
[1]
|
Anker, A. E., & Feeley, T. H. (2011). Are non-participants in prosocial behavior merely innocent bystanders? Health Com-munication, 26, 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.527618[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[2]
|
Burn, S. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779-792.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5[CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Cialdini, R. B., & Richardson, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of impression management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.406[CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflectedglory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 20, 942-958.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00671.x[CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
Gasser, L., & Malti, T. (2012). Children’s and their friends’ moral reasoning: Relations with aggressive behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 358-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025412448353[CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borgh, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in students’ perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 617-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.02.001[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[7]
|
Hoefnagels, C., & Zwikker, M. (2001). The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latane and Darley model to domestic violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1158-1183.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02668.x[CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders’ behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 261-282.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0052[CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x[CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Perusse, D. (2007). Do friends’ characteristics moderate the prospective links between peer victimization and reactive and proactive aggression? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 665-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9122-7[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[11]
|
Marks, P. E. L., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Crick, N. R. (2012). Pop-ularity contagion among adolescents. Social Development, 21, 501-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00647.x[CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., Livingston, J. A., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 391-400.
|
|
[13]
|
Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive by standing behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815-827.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[14]
|
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007[CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::aid-ab1>3.0.co;2-t[CrossRef]
|
|
[16]
|
Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). By standers matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying be-havior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668-676.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[17]
|
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.
|