不同出料方式的流化罐发送料特性实验研究
The Conveying Characteristics of Blow Tank Discharge in Different Types
DOI: 10.12677/HJCET.2018.81001, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 康 岩, 温良英, 韩 旭, 王海鹏, 洪小哲:重庆大学材料科学与工程学院,重庆;何海熙:中冶赛迪技术研究中心有限公司,重庆
关键词: 流化罐喷粉量固气比上出料下出料局部阻力系数Blow Tank Solid Mass Flow Rate Solid/Gas Mass Ratio Lateral Discharge Bottom Discharge Local Resistance Coefficient
摘要: 为研究不同出料方式流化罐发送粉料的特性,构建了流态化喷吹粉料的气力输送实验平台,通过实验系统考察了流化罐罐压、稳压气量与底部流化气量之比对喷粉量和固气比的影响,以及上出料和下出料两种不同出料方式的发送料特性。结果表明,喷粉量随着流化罐罐压的增加而增加,固气比则先急剧增加而后逐渐趋于平缓。在流化罐内压力一定的情况下,喷粉量和固气比均随着顶部稳压气量与底部流化气量比例的增大先增大后减小,在顶部稳压气量:底部流化气量 = 2:8时达到最大;在罐内压力相同的情况下,上出料的喷粉量比下出料的高,发送相同质量的粉料下出料所用的时间比上出料约多三分之一;通过计算出料管的局部阻力及阻力系数发现,上出料管的附加压力损失及其局部阻力系数小于下出料管的附加压力损失及其局部阻力系数。
Abstract: To research the conveying characteristics of different discharge types of blow tank, a comprehensive dense phase pneumatic conveying system including a lateral discharge and a bottom discharge blow tank was developed to simulate the transportation of blasting fluidized powder. Conveying characteristics of discharge types under different conditions were investigated, and the influence of fluidized tank pressure and pressurizing gas/fluidizing gas ratio on the solid mass flow rate and solid/gas mass ratio was investigated. Results indicate that the solid mass flow rate and solid/gas mass ratio increases with the raising of the pressure of blow tank. As the pressure of blow tank raises, solid mass flow rate increases and the solid/gas mass ratio starts with a sharp increase and then slowly increases. Under constant pressure of blow tank, solid mass flow rate and solid/gas mass ratio firstly increases and then decreases, to be maximized when pressurizing gas/fluidizing gas ratio is 2:8. At the same pressure of blow tank, the solid mass flow rate for the lateral discharge is larger than the bottom discharge. The bottom discharge type uses one third more time than the lateral discharge type for transporting the same quality solid. By calculating the local resistance and resistance coefficient of the elbow near the outlet of blow tank, we found that the resistance and the resistance coefficient for the bottom are bigger than the lateral discharge conveying systems.
文章引用:康岩, 温良英, 韩旭, 何海熙, 王海鹏, 洪小哲. 不同出料方式的流化罐发送料特性实验研究[J]. 化学工程与技术, 2018, 8(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCET.2018.81001

参考文献

[1] Solt, P.E. (2003) Comparing Dilute- and Dense-Phase Conveying.
[2] Li, H. and Yuji, T. (2000) Particle Velocity and Concentration Characteristics in a Horizontal Dilute Swirling Flow Pneumatic Conveying. Powder Technology, 107, 144-152.
[3] Geldart, D. and Ling, S.J. (1990) Dense Phase Conveying of Fine Coal at High Total Pressures. Powder Technology, 62, 243-252.
[4] Singer, T. (2003) Dense-Phase Pneumatic Conveying: Applications, System Design, and Troubleshooting.
[5] Luis, S., Nestor, V., Klinzing George, E. and Shrikant, D. (2003) Characterization of Bulk Solids to Assess Dense Phase Pneumatic Conveying. Powder Technology, 138, 93-117.
[6] 杨伦, 谢一华. 气力输送工程[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2006.
[7] 徐贵玲, 陈晓平, 梁财, 等. 煤粉上出料式发送罐气力输送特性[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(6): 1709-1716.
[8] 董卫宾. 上出料发料罐系统粉煤密相气力输送特性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2011.
[9] 梁财. 高压超浓相煤粉气力输送流动特性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南京: 东南大学, 2007.
[10] 董卫宾, 郭晓镭, 龚欣, 等. 上出料系统粉煤密相气力输送特性及其与下出料系统的比较[J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62(7): 1989-1997.
[11] 贺春辉, 陈先梅, 倪红亮, 等. 发送罐出料方式对煤粉高压密相气力输送特性的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2012, 32(23): 32-39.
[12] 黄标. 气力输送[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1984.