山西灵空山油松林凋落物节律研究
Study on Litterfall Production and Dynamic in Pinus tabuliformis Forest of Lingkong Mountain, Shanxi Province
DOI: 10.12677/BR.2018.73043, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 陈利人, 梁茂儒, 贺悦, 张晓珍, 郭东罡:山西大学环境与资源学院,山西 太原
关键词: 灵空山油松凋落物动态变化Lingkong Mountain Pinus tabuliformis Litterfall Dynamic Variation
摘要: 依托山西灵空山4 hm2松栎混交林和1 hm2油松(Pinus tabuliformis)纯林森林动态监测样地为研究平台,以2014年10月到2015年10月收集的凋落物为研究对象,对其产量和组成的动态变化特征进行研究。结果表明松栎混交林的凋落物年产量为3644.97 kg∙hm−2∙a−1,油松纯林年产量为4402.79 kg∙hm−2∙a−1,差异显著(P < 0.05)。两种群落类型的凋落集中在10~11月份,总体动态呈现单峰型;包括叶、枝、树皮在内的营养器官所占总量比例,4 hm2和1 hm2样地分别为73.58%和81.20%,其凋落动态也为单峰型;年凋落物量各组分中落叶量最大,主导了总量的月动态变化趋势,4 hm2样地和1 hm2样地分别为2348.36 kg∙hm−2∙a−1和3068.89 kg∙hm−2∙a−1,占总量的64.43%和69.72%。两样地凋落物中落枝量以及生殖器官量无显著差异,而落叶量、树皮量、杂物量均有显著差异(P < 0.05)。生殖器官方面,4 hm2样地和1 hm2样地的年产量分别为798.50 kg∙hm−2∙a−1和598.72 kg∙hm−2∙a−1,占总量的21.91%和13.60%;两样地的生殖器官凋落动态均为双峰型。4 hm2样地上收集到的生殖器官中最大的组分为辽东栎果实,1 hm2样地上最大的组分为油松球果。两样地上油松物种落叶动态相似,而4 hm2样地内油松和辽东栎两物种凋落动态有一定差异:油松针叶动态不同年份差异较大,而辽东栎落叶规律性相对较强,其高峰均为10月;两者落花都集中在6月份,果的凋落期分别为10月~11月和8月~10月。
Abstract: This study was based on the 4 hm2 Pinus tabuliformis and Quercus wutaishanica mixed forest and 1 hm2 Pinus tabuliformis forest dynamic monitoring plot in Lingkong Mountain, Shanxi Province. We studied litterfall from October 2014 to October 2015 with litterfall traps, and analyzed the yield amount, composition and dynamic variation features of the samples. The annual littlefall production was calculated as 3644.97 kg∙hm−2∙a−1 in the mixed forest of Pinus tabuliformis and Quercus wutaishanica, and that was 4402.79 kg∙hm-2∙a−1 in the Pinus tabuliformis pure forest, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). In both communities, the litter patterns could be described by a single-peaked curve, and it peaked during October and November. The percentage of nutritive organs (including leaf, bark and brunch) was 73.58% and 81.20%, respectively. Their litter pattern could be also described by a single-peaked curve. The annual leaf litter was both the largest in the 4 hm2 and 1 hm2 sample plots among all the elements, which was 2348.36 kg∙hm−2∙a−1 and 3068.89 kg∙hm−2∙a−1, and accounted 64.43% and 69.72%, respectively. Leaf litter dominated the monthly dynamics of total litter. There was no remarkable difference on brunch litter and reproductive organ litter between two plots. However, leaf litter, bark litter and other litter all showed obvious difference (P < 0.05). As for reproductive organs, the annual litterfall production was 798.50 kg∙hm−2∙a−1 in 4 hm2 plot and 598.72 kg∙hm−2∙a−1 in 1 hm2 plot, making up 21.91% and 13.60% in total litterfall amount. The dynamics curves of reproductive organ litter were both double-peaked in two plots. The largest element of reproductive organs in 4 hm2 plot was Quercus wutaishanica fruit, while Pinus tabuliformis fruit was the major in 1 hm2 plot. The dynamics of Pinus tabuliformis litter in 4 hm2 plot was similar to that in 1 hm2 plot, while the litter dynamics of Pinus tabuliformis and Quercus wutaishanica had a certain difference: needle leaf litter dynamics of Pinus tabuliformis varied with different years, while broad leaf litter pattern of Quercus wutaishanica was regular relatively, and they both reached the top in October; the flower litter peak of the two species both emerged in June, while the fruit litter periods for Pinus tabuliformis and Quercus wutaishanica were from October to November and from August to October, respectively.
文章引用:陈利人, 梁茂儒, 贺悦, 张晓珍, 郭东罡. 山西灵空山油松林凋落物节律研究[J]. 植物学研究, 2018, 7(3): 337-349. https://doi.org/10.12677/BR.2018.73043

参考文献

[1] 王凤友. 森林凋落量综述研究[J]. 生态系统学进展, 1989, 6(2): 95-102.
[2] 汪思龙, 陈楚莹, 王清奎, 等. 森林残落物生态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[3] 林波, 刘庆, 吴彦, 等. 森林凋落物研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(1): 60-64.
[4] 何帆. 秦岭林区油松、锐齿栎林凋落叶分解及其凋落物储量动态研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2011.
[5] 吕瑞恒, 李国雷, 刘勇, 等. 不同林龄油松针叶凋落物初期分解特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(2): 39-44.
[6] 崔建国, 镡娟. 辽西油松蒙古栎林下凋落物现存量及持水能力的研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2008, 15(2): 154-155.
[7] 姜沛沛, 曹扬, 陈云明, 等. 不同林龄油松(Pinus tabulaeformis)人工林植物、凋落物与土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19): 6188-6197.
[8] 刘向东, 吴钦孝, 赵鸿雁. 黄土高原油松人工林枯枝落叶层水文生态功能研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 1991(4): 87-92.
[9] 卢宁, 李晋川, 岳建英, 等. 平朔露天煤矿复垦区刺槐油松混交林凋落物量及动态特征[J]. 山西农业科学, 2016, 44(1): 36-39.
[10] 马承恩, 孔德良, 陈正侠, 等. 根系在凋落物层中的生长及其对凋落物分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(11): 1197-1204.
[11] 李雪峰, 韩士杰, 李玉文, 等. 东北地区主要森林生态系统凋落量的比较[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(5): 783-788.
[12] 张新平, 王襄平, 朱彪, 等. 我国东北主要森林类型的凋落物产量及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5): 1031-1040.
[13] 侯玲玲, 毛子军, 孙涛, 等. 小兴安岭十种典型森林群落凋落物生物量及其动态变化[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(6): 1994-2002.
[14] 武启骞, 王传宽, 张全智. 6种温带森林凋落量年际及年内动态[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(3): 760-769.
[15] Vogt, K.A.., Grier, C.C. and Vogt, D.J. (1986) Production, Turnover, and Nutrient Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Detritus of World Forests. Advances in Ecological Research, 15, 303-377.
[16] Wang, Q., Wang, S. and Huang, Y. (2008) Comparisons of Litterfall, Litter Decomposition and Nutrient Return in a Monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata, and a Mixed Stand in Southern China. Forest Ecology & Management, 255, 1210-1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 骆宗诗, 向成华, 慕长龙. 绵阳官司河流域主要森林类型凋落物含量及动态变化[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(5): 1772-1781.
[18] 郭婧, 喻林华, 方晰, 等. 中亚热带4种森林凋落物量、组成、动态及其周转期[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14): 4668-4677.
[19] 林益明, 何建源, 杨志伟, 等. 武夷山甜槠群落凋落物的产量及其动态[J]. 厦门大学学报(自然版), 1999, 38(2): 280-286.
[20] 宁晓波, 项文化, 王光军, 等. 湖南会同连作杉木林凋落物量20年动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9): 5122-5129.
[21] Bray, J.R. and Gorham, E. (1964) Litter Production in Forests of the World. Advances in Ecological Research, 2, 101-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Aber, J.D., Melillo, J.M. and Mcclaugherty, C.A. (1990) Predicting Long-Term Patterns of Mass Loss, Nitrogen Dynamics, and Soil Organic Matter Formation from Initial Fine Litter Chemistry in Temperate Forest Ecosystems. Botany-Botanique, 6, 2201-2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] 张东来. 帽儿山林区两种主要林分类型凋落物研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2006.